Advertisement

Hu Shi’s Search for the “Chinese Sophist” and “Spirit of Courageous Doubt”

  • Rya ButterfieldEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Hu Shi, a twentieth-century scholar and reformer, perceived a foundation for China’s future in a more complicated rendition of China’s intellectual past. Hu understood China’s predicament in rhetorical terms, as an exigent situation that could not be effectively confronted without the right intellectual and cultural resources. Like other pragmatists, Hu saw democracy as a way life. He did not think that democratic thought was foreign to China. This essay is an examination of one arm of Hu’s plan for rhetorical pragmatic reform. First developed in his dissertation, “The Development of Logical Method in Ancient China,” this arm sought to develop a pragmatic “attitude toward ideas” and restore the characteristics of what he calls the “Chinese Sophist” and the original “spirit of courageous doubt.”

References

  1. Arendt, Hannah. 2006. Between Past and Future. New York: Penguin Group.Google Scholar
  2. Burke, Kenneth. 1984. Permanence and Change: An Anatomy of Purpose, 3rd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  3. Crick, Nathan. 2015. Rhetoric & Power: The Drama of Classical Greece. Columbia: The University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  4. Danisch, Robert. 2007. Pragmatism, Democracy, and the Necessity of Rhetoric. Columbia: The University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  5. ———. 2015. Building a Social Democracy: The Promise of Rhetorical Pragmatism. New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  6. Dewey, John. 1954. The Public & Its Problems. Athens: Swallow Press, Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Grieder, Jerome B. 1999. Hu Shih and the Chinese Renaissance: Liberalism in the Chinese Revolution, 1917–1937. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Hu, Shih. 1919. “Intellectual China in 1919 (The Chinese Social and Political Review 4, no. 4).” In Hu Shih Yingwen Wencun (胡適英文文存, A Collection of Hu Shih’s English Writings), 3 vols., Compiled by Chih-P’ing Chou (周質平), 345–355. Taibei: Yuanliu chub.Google Scholar
  9. ———. 1922. The Development of Logical Method in Ancient China. Shanghai: Shanghai Oriental Book Co.Google Scholar
  10. ———. 1926. “The Renaissance in China.” Journal of the Royal Institute of International Affairs 5 (6): 265–283.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 1930. “Which Road Are We Going?” Pacific Affairs 3 (10): 933–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. ———. 1931. “Essay in Living Philosophies.” In A Collection of Hu Shih’s English Writings, vol. I, 235–263. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 1934. The Chinese Renaissance: The Haskell Lectures 1933. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. ———. 1959. “The Scientific Spirit and Method in Chinese Philosophy.” 9 (1/2, Preliminary Report on the Third East-West Philosophers’ Conference).Google Scholar
  15. ———. 1963. “The Right to Doubt in Ancient Chinese Thought.” Philosophy East and West 12 (4): 295–300.Google Scholar
  16. ———. 1995. “Confucianism (Edwin R.A. Seligman, ed., Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences Vol. 4. NY: Macmillan Co, 1931, pp. 198–200).” In Hu Shih Yingwen Wencun (胡適英文文存, A Collection of Hu Shih’s English Writings), Compiled by Chih-P’ing Chou (周質平). Taibei: Yuanliu chuban.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 2013. “Essay in Living Philosophies.” In English Writings of Hu Shih, 85–100. New York: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  18. Johnson, Ian. 2016. “A Revolutionary Discovery in China, a Review of: Sarah Allan ‘Legends of Abdication and Ideal Government in Early Chinese Bamboo-Slip’ (2016).” New York Review of Books, April.Google Scholar
  19. Ke-wen, Wang. 1998. Modern China: An Encyclopedia of History, Culture, and Nationalism. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  20. Lu, Xing. 2015. “Comparative Rhetoric: Contemplating on Tasks and Methodologies in the Twenty-First Century.” Rhetoric Review 34 (2): 266–273.Google Scholar
  21. Yao, Xinzhong. 2000. An Introduction to Confucianism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mass CommunicationNicholls State UniversityThibodauxUSA

Personalised recommendations