Advertisement

On the Uses and On-going Relevance of Pragmatism for Communication Studies

  • Robert DanischEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter shows that philosophical pragmatism entails a commitment to communication and rhetorical practice. Therefore, the best way to advance the pragmatist project is to turn philosophical questions about truth, morality, logic, aesthetics, or language into rhetorical questions about the best methods or practices for citizenship, leadership, inquiry, deliberation, public argument, and community building. Furthermore, the best way to improve democratic culture (and to realize Dewey’s dream of the great community) is through attending to, promoting, and cultivating specific forms of rhetorical practice. The central claim of this essay is that by emphasizing the skills necessary for improving our circumstances and the practical application of knowledge for that task, pragmatism teaches us that rhetorical communication is the best available means of making our way as well as we can in a world marked by contingency, uncertainty, plurality, and social interaction.

References

  1. Bacon, Michael. 2012. Pragmatism: An Introduction. Boston: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  2. Brandom, Robert. 1998. Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Danisch, Robert. 2015. Building a Social Democracy: The Promise of Rhetorical Pragmatism. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  4. Dewey, John. 1916 [1944]. Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  5. Dewey, John. 1925 [1958]. Experience and Nature. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  6. Dewey, John. 1927 [1946]. The Public and Its Problems. New York: Philosophical Library, Inc.Google Scholar
  7. Diggins, John Patrick. 1994. The Promise of Pragmatism: Modernism and the Crisis of Knowledge and Authority. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Farrell, Thomas. 1995. Norms of Rhetorical Culture. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Habinek, Thomas. 2004. Ancient Rhetoric and Oratory. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  10. Hauser, Gerard, ed. 2008. Philosophy and Rhetoric in Dialogue: Redrawing Their Intellectual Landscape. State College, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Ijselling, J. C. 1976. Rhetoric and Philosophy in Conflict: A Historical Survey. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. James, William. 1907 [1995]. Pragmatism. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  13. Keith, William. 2007. Democracy as Discussion: Civic Education and the American Forum Movement. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  14. Kimball, Bruce. 1995. Orators and Philosophers: A History of the Idea of Liberal Education. Mt. Vernon, IL: College Board.Google Scholar
  15. Menand, Louis. 2002. The Metaphysical Club: A Story of Ideas in America. New York: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux.Google Scholar
  16. Misak, Cheryl. 2015. The American Pragmatists. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Schiappa, Edward. 1995. “Isocrates’ Philosophia and Contemporary Pragmatism.” In Rhetoric, Sophistry, Pragmatism, edited by Steven Mailloux, 33–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Schiappa, Edward. 1999. The Beginnings of Rhetorical Theory in Classical Greece. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Schiappa, Edward. 2003. Protagoras and Logos: A Study in Greek Philosophy and Rhetoric. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  20. Stuhr, John, ed. 1999. Pragmatism and Classical American Philosophy: Essential Readings and Interpretive Essays. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Talisse, Robert. 2008. Pragmatism: A Guide for the Perplexed. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  22. Westbrook, Robert. 2005. Democratic Hope: Pragmatism and the Politics of Truth. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Communication ArtsUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations