Advertisement

Working Alongside: Community Archaeology in Post-native Title Australia

  • A. BuhrichEmail author
  • S. McIntyre-Tamwoy
  • S. Greer
Chapter
Part of the One World Archaeology book series (WORLDARCH)

Abstract

Cultural heritage research is not impartial to local or wider politics. While community-based projects need to address local issues, histories and protocols, external forces such as legislation also influence methodologies. This chapter describes a process for developing collaborative approaches to research projects with Aboriginal groups in the Australian Wet Tropics that addresses local protocol and legislative frameworks to produce mutually beneficial research outcomes (of benefit to the researcher and the community). This process provided two-pronged outcomes—the researcher was able to identify, record and assess the preservation of cultural sites while Aboriginal communities used the project to assert ownership, build their own site databases, train younger land managers and rangers and record cultural knowledge. The approach also had limitations. Governance, resourcing, recognition of “native title” and other factors influenced both the capacity and desire for groups to participate in heritage projects. The resulting power sharing arrangements provides a framework for “working alongside” community groups in a post-native title landscape.

Keywords

Community archaeology Wet Tropics Native title rights Heritage ownership 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank MaMu Aboriginal Corporation, Mullen Bun Goon Limited, Wabubadda Aboriginal Corporation, Western Yalanji Aboriginal Corporation, Yirrganydji Gurabana Aboriginal Corporation and all the individual custodians involved in fieldwork, administrative support and project management for the rock art and dendroglyph recording and our many associated projects. This research was part of the Australian Research Council Discovery Grant Objects of Possession: Artefact Transactions in the Wet Tropics of North Queensland, 1870–2013 and individual projects received funding from the Wet Tropics Management Authority Student Research Grant Program, Queensland Indigenous Land and Sea Grants Program and James Cook University Post-Graduate Research Scheme.

References

  1. Atalay, S. (2012). Community-based archaeology: Research with, by, and for indigenous and local communities. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  2. Brady, L. (2010). Pictures, patterns and objects: Rock art of the Torres Strait Islands, Northeast Australia. North Melbourne: Australian Scholarly Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Brady, L. M., & Bradley, J. J. (2014). Reconsidering regional rock art styles: Exploring cultural and relational understandings in northern Australia’s Gulf country. Journal of Social Archaeology, 14(3), 361–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brady, L. M., & Kearney, A. (2016). Sitting in the gap: Ethnoarchaeology, rock art and methodological openness. World Archaeology, 48(5), 642–655.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.2016.1193042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buhrich, A. (2017). Art and identity: Aboriginal rock art and dendroglyphs of Queensland’s Wet Tropics. PhD dissertation, James Cook University, Townsville.Google Scholar
  6. Calwell-Chanthaphonh, C., & Ferguson, T. J. (2010). Intersecting magisterial: Bridging archaeological science and traditional knowledge. Journal of Archaeological Science, 10(3), 325–346.Google Scholar
  7. Clarke, A. (2002). The ideal and the real: Cultural and personal transformations of archaeological research on Groote Eylandt, northern Australia. World Archaeology, 34(2), 249–264.  https://doi.org/10.1080/004382402200000708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cole, N., Musgrave, G., George, L., George, T., & Banjo, D. (2002). Community archaeology at Laura, Cape York Peninsula. In: S. Ulm, C. Westcott, J. Reid, A. Ross, I. Lilley, J. Pragnell, & L. Kirkwood (Eds.), Barriers, borders, boundaries: Proceedings of the 2001 Australian Archaeological Association Annual Conference (Tempus 7, pp. 137–150). Brisbane: Anthropology Museum, The University of Queensland.Google Scholar
  9. Cosgrove, R., Field, J., & Ferrier, A. (2007). The archaeology of Australia’s tropical rainforests. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 251, 150–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Domingo, I.S., May, S.K. and Smith, C.E. (2016). Communicating through rock art: An ethnoarchaeological perspective. In C. Mordant, O. Buchsenschutz, C. Jeunesse and D. Vialou (Eds.), Signes et Communication dans les Civilisations de la Parole, Édition Electronique du CTHS (Actes des Congrees des Sociétés Historiques et Scientifiques) (pp. 9–26).Google Scholar
  11. Doring, J., & Nyawarra, P. (2014). Gwion artists and Wunan Law: The origin of society in Australia. Rock Art Research, 31(1), 3–13.Google Scholar
  12. Fuary, M. (2009). An evaluation of previous and current methods and models for researching indigenous resource use and purposes, with recommendations for ‘best practice’ research solutions. Report to the Marine and Tropical Sciences Research Facility (MTSRF). Published online by the Reef and Rainforest Research Centre Ltd., Cairns. Retrieved from http://www.rrrc.org.au/publications/downloads/491-JCU-Fuary-M-2009-Indigenous-resourceUse.pdf.
  13. Greer, S. (1996). The accidental heritage: Archaeology and identity in northern Cape York. PhD dissertation, James Cook University, Townsville.Google Scholar
  14. Greer, S. (2010). Heritage and empowerment: Community-based Indigenous cultural heritage in northern Australia. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 16(1–2), 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Greer, S., Harrison, R., & McIntyre-Tamwoy, S. (2002). Community-based archaeology in Australia. World Archaeology, 34(2), 265–287.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00438240220000070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hampson, J. (2015). Rock art and regional identity a comparative perspective. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hutson, S. R., Herrera, G. C., & Chi, G. A. (2013). Maya heritage: Entangled and transformed. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 7258, 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2012.756422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Layton, R. (1992). Australian rock art: A new synthesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Liebmann, M. (2018). Losing control in the American southwest: Collaborative archaeology in the service of descent communities. In S. Silliman (Ed.), Engaging archaeology: 25 case studies in research practice. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  20. Lyons, N. (2013). Where the wind blows us: Practicing critical community archaeology in the Canadian North. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  21. Martin, K. L. (2008). Please knock before you enter: Aboriginal regulation of outsiders and the implications for researchers. Brisbane: Post Pressed.Google Scholar
  22. May, S. K., Gurmurdal, D., Manakgu, J., Maralngurra, G., & Nawirridj, W. (2005). ‘You write it all down and bring it back … that’s what we want’ - Revisiting the 1948 removal of human remains from Kunbarlanja (Oenpelli), Australia. In C. Smith & M. Wobst (Eds.), Indigenous archaeologies one world archaeology (Vol. 47, pp. 110–130). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. May, S. K., Taçon, P. S. C., Wesley, D., & Travers, M. (2010). Painting history: Indigenous observations and depictions of the “Other” in Northwestern Arnhem land, Australia. Australian Archaeology, 71, 57–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McIntyre-Tamwoy, S. (2002). Red devils and white men. PhD dissertation, James Cook University, Townsville.Google Scholar
  25. McIntyre-Tamwoy, S. (2011). Hunting magic, maintenance ceremonies and increase sites exploring traditional management systems for marine resources in northern Cape York Peninsula. Historic Environment, 23(2), 19–25.Google Scholar
  26. McIntyre-Tamwoy, S., Canendo, W., & Wyles-Whelan, T. (2010). Wet Tropics traditional owners strategic research directions workshop report, Innisfail, September 15–16, 2009 (55p). Final Report to the Australian Government’s Marine and Tropical Sciences Research Facility (MTSRF). Published online by the Reef and Rainforest Research Centre Limited, Cairns.Google Scholar
  27. Mundraby, V., & Hundloe, T. (1998). Which way our cultural survival: The review of Aboriginal Involvement in the management of the Wet Tropics World Heritage area. A report prepared for the Wet Tropics Board of Management by the Review Steering Committee.Google Scholar
  28. National Native Title Tribunal. (2010). Native title: An overview. Brisbane: NNTT Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  29. Nursery-Bray, M. (2006). Conflict to co-management: Eating our words. Towards socially just conservation of Green Turtles and Dugongs in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. PhD dissertation James Cook University, Townsville.Google Scholar
  30. Porr, M., & Bell, M. (2011). ‘Rock-art’, ‘animism’ and two way thinking: Towards a complementary epistemology in the understanding of material culture and ‘rock-art’ of hunting and gathering people. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 19, 161–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ross, J., & Davidson, I. (2006). Rock Art and ritual: An archaeological analysis of Rock Art in Arid Central Australia. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 13(4), 304–340.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-006-9021-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Smith, C. (1992). Colonising with style: Reviewing the nexus between rock art, territorially and the colonisation and occupation of Sahul. Australian Archaeology, 34, 34–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Smith, C. (2010). Panache and protocol in Australian Aboriginal art. In I. Dominga Sanz, D. Fiore, & S. K. May (Eds.), Archaeologies of art (pp. 215–241). Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
  34. Smith, C., & Jackson, G. (2008). The ethics of collaboration whose culture? Whose intellectual property? Who benefits? In C. Colwell-Chanthaphonh & T. J. Ferguson (Eds.), Collaboration in archaeological practice: Engaging descendent communities (pp. 171–191). Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  35. Taçon, P. S. C. (1994). Socialising landscapes: The long-term implications of signs, symbols and marks on the land. Archaeology in Oceania, 29(3), 117–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO). (1972). Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage, available at: https://www.refworld.org/docid/4042287a4.html [accessed 14 March 2019]
  37. Wet Tropics Aboriginal Plan Project Team. (2005). Caring for country and culture - The Wet Tropics Aboriginal cultural and natural resource management plan. Cairns: Rainforest CRC and FNQ NRM Ltd..Google Scholar
  38. Wet Tropics Management Authority. (2005). Wet Tropics of Queensland World Heritage Area Regional Agreement. Retrieved from http://www.wettropics.gov.au/site/user-assets/docs/regional_agreement.pdf.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Arts, Society and Education, James Cook University and Tropx ConsultantsTownsvilleAustralia
  2. 2.College of Arts, Society and Education, James Cook University and Navin Officer Heritage ConsultantsTownsvilleAustralia
  3. 3.College of Arts, Society and Education, James Cook UniversityTownsvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations