Advertisement

Working with Communities and World Heritage Places: Local, Professional and Educational Communities and the Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority

  • Jody Steele
  • Jane HarringtonEmail author
  • Caitlin Vertigan
Chapter
Part of the One World Archaeology book series (WORLDARCH)

Abstract

The Port Arthur, Coal Mines and Cascades Female Factory Historic Sites are 3 of the 11 places that comprise the Australian Convict Sites World Heritage property. With Port Arthur having celebrated 100 years as an actively managed heritage reserve in 2016, the histories of our sites are as much histories of heritage management as they are of penal transportation and convictism. The Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority (PAHSMA) is tasked with managing these precious manifestations of Australia’s history and equally charged with the responsibility to manage the more local, post-convict stories of these places and their associated people. This would not be possible without actively engaging with local, professional, and educational communities. This chapter explores how the Authority engages with people and groups who reflect a multiplicity of community interests in our heritage places and how these relationships ensure the multiple histories of our places are researched, presented, and valued.

Keywords

Community engagement World Heritage Convict Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority (PAHSMA) 

References

  1. Boyce, J. (2008). Van Diemen’s land: A history. Melbourne: Black.Google Scholar
  2. Brand, I. (1998). Penal peninsula: Port Arthur and its outstations, 1827-1898. Launceston: Regal Publications.Google Scholar
  3. Clark, J. (Ed.). (2009). The career of William Thompson, convict. Port Arthur: PAHSMA.Google Scholar
  4. Department of Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts (DEWHA). (2008). Australian convict sites world heritage nomination. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication data: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  5. Frost, L. (2004). Footsteps and voices: A historical look into the Cascades Female Factory. Hobart: Female Factory Historic Site. CRC for Sustainable Tourism.Google Scholar
  6. Ham, S. H. (1992). Environmental interpretation: A practical guide for people with big ideas and small budgets. Golden: North American Press.Google Scholar
  7. Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority. (2002). Landscape Management Plan. Retrieved from https://portarthur.org.au/wpcontent/uploads/2017/12/PAHSMA-Landscape-Management-Plan.pdf
  8. Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority. (2008). Port Arthur Historic Sites Statutory Management Plan. Retrieved from https://portarthur.org.au/wpcontent/uploads/2017/11/SMP_APRIL_2009.pdf.
  9. Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority. (2013). Coal Mines Historic Site Master Plan. Retrieved from https://trove.nla.gov.au/version/204069540
  10. Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority Act. (1987). Tasmanian Legislation, Tasmania’s consolidated legislation online. Retrieved from https://www.legislation.tas.gov.au/view/html/inforce/current/act-1987-061.
  11. Shaw, A. G. L. (1977). Convicts and the colonies: A study of penal transportation from Great Britain and Ireland to Australia and other parts of the British Empire. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Tilden, F. (1957). Interpreting our heritage: Principles and practices for visitor services in parks, museums, and historic places. Durham: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jody Steele
    • 1
  • Jane Harrington
    • 1
    Email author
  • Caitlin Vertigan
    • 1
  1. 1.Port Arthur Historic Site Management AuthorityPort ArthurAustralia

Personalised recommendations