Advertisement

Promoting Descendant Communities in Urban Community Archaeology: A study of Canberra, Australia

  • Bridget San Miguel
  • Matilda House
Chapter
Part of the One World Archaeology book series (WORLDARCH)

Abstract

Community archaeology gives partial control of a project to stakeholder communities, allowing nuanced understandings of archaeological data to emerge. In Australia, this framework has focused on non-urban areas where Aboriginal communities are perceived to have stronger connections to the past. Australian community archaeology is rarely conducted in urban areas, and no projects in urban settings have focused on promoting Aboriginal, descendant community voices. To address this research gap, a collaborative project was conducted in Canberra, in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT), with Dr Matilda House, a Ngunnawal/Ngambri Elder in the region. Promoting Matilda’s voice as an Aboriginal woman, this project investigated her personal perspective in an urban setting. Six sites of significance were reassessed following a “stories first” methodological approach within the community archaeology framework.

This approach uncovered two layers of cultural landscape in Canberra. The first is a traditional landscape of cultural links to natural features, ceremonial sites, and sites where food and other resources were obtained. Elements of this landscape had been previously recorded at the six case study sites, although further information was revealed during this project. The second layer is contemporary, in which heritage management of the traditional landscape has led to new relationships with and between sites. This contemporary landscape emphasises strong links between all Aboriginal sites in the ACT, the educational value of heritage sites and the significance of personal involvement in heritage processes.

Focusing on Matilda’s perspective gave value to her personal story, revealing a multilayered landscape rarely documented in Australian community archaeology and not documented elsewhere in the ACT. In Canberra’s urban environment, where much archaeological information has been lost, this personal approach to community archaeology has proved effective in opening discussions about the way heritage and archaeology are managed.

Keywords

Community archaeology Australia Canberra Heritage management Cultural landscapes Urban archaeology Stories first 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Thank you to Duncan Wright for reviewing early drafts of this chapter, Dave Johnston for his support during this project and assistance with fieldwork, Tiana House for her valuable insights, and Tom Sapienza for contributing the maps in Fig. 1.

References

  1. ACT Government. (2018). ACT Heritage Register. Department of Environment, Planning and Sustainable Development Directorate—Environment. Accessed April 7, 2018, from https://www.environment.act.gov.au/heritage/heritage_register.
  2. ACT Heritage Council. (2011). Heritage (Decision about Registration for Gubur Dhaura—Aboriginal Ochre Quarry and Historic Mining Area). Notice 2011. ACT Parliamentary Council.Google Scholar
  3. ACT Heritage Council. (n.d.-a). 20045 Blandfordia 5 Housing Precinct. Entry to the ACT Heritage Register. ACT Government.Google Scholar
  4. ACT Heritage Council. (n.d.-b). 20020 Theodore Aboriginal Artefact Grinding Site, Section 681 Blocks 3, 4 and 5, Theodore. Entry to the ACT Heritage Register.Google Scholar
  5. ACTmapi. (2016). Heritage map. ACT Government. Retrieved December 2, 2016, from http://www.actmapi.act.gov.au.
  6. Anutech Ptd. Ltd. (1984). An Archaeological Study of South Tuggeranong. Report to NCDC.Google Scholar
  7. Behr, M. (1992). A Management Plan for the Tuggeranong Axe-Grinding Grooves. ACT Heritage Unit: Tuggeranong.Google Scholar
  8. Brady, L., David, B., Manas, L., & Mualgal (Torres Strait Islanders) Corporation. (2003). Community archaeology and oral tradition: Commemorating and teaching cultural awareness on Mua Island, Torres Strait. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 31, 41–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Byrne, D. (1996). Deep nation: Australia’s acquisition of an indigenous past. Aboriginal History, 20, 82–107.Google Scholar
  10. Byrne, D. (2002). An archaeology of attachment: Cultural heritage and the post-contact. In R. Harrison & C. Williamson (Eds.), After Captain Cook: The archaeology of the recent Indigenous past in Australia (pp. 135–146). Sydney: Archaeological Computing Laboratory: University of Sydney.Google Scholar
  11. Byrne, S. (2012). Community archaeology as knowledge management: Reflections from Uneapa Island, Papua New Guinea. Public Archaeology, 11(1), 26–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Byrne, D., Bradshaw, H., & Ireland, T. (2003). Social significance: A discussion paper (2nd ed.). Sydney: NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service.Google Scholar
  13. Chidester, R., & Gadsby, D. (2009). One neighbourhood, two communities: The public archaeology of class in a gentrifying urban neighborhood. International Labor and Working-Class History, 76, 127–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chirikure, S., & Pwiti, G. (2008). Community involvement in archaeology and cultural heritage management. Current Anthropology, 49(3), 467–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clarke, A. (2002). The ideal and the real: Cultural and personal transformations of archaeological research on Groote Eylandt, northern Australia. World Archaeology, 34(2), 249–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clarke, A., & Paterson, A. (2003). Cross-cultural archaeology: And introduction. Archaeology in Oceania, 38, 49–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cole, T. (2011). The Stanwell Mothers Project: Reaching archaeologists and communities. In G. Moshenska & S. Dhanjal (Eds.), Community archaeology: Themes, methods and practices (pp. 71–79). Oxford: Oxbow Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Collins, S. (2010). Lanyon Conservation Management Plan: Further Aboriginal heritage works. Report for ACT Historic Places by Cultural Heritage Management Australia.Google Scholar
  19. Collins, S. (2014). Lanyon heritage precinct: Further Aboriginal heritage investigations. Report for ACT Heritage Council by Cultural Heritage Management Australia.Google Scholar
  20. Collins, S. (2015). Lanyon heritage precinct: Archaeological investigations of PAD5 heritage site. Report for ACT Heritage Council by Cultural Heritage Management Australia.Google Scholar
  21. Conkey, M. (2005). Dwelling at the margins, action at the intersection? Feminist and Indigenous archaeologies. Archaeologies, 1(1), 9–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. David, B., McNiven, I., Manas, L., Manas, J., Savage, S., Crouch, J., Neliman, G., & Brady, L. (2004). Goba of Mua: Archaeology working with oral tradition. Antiquity, 78(299), 158–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. English, A. (2002). More than archaeology: Developing comprehensive approaches to Aboriginal heritage management in NSW. Australian Journal of Environmental Management, 9(4), 218–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Faulkner, N. (2000). Archaeology from below. Public Archaeology, 1, 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Field, J., Barker, J., Barker, R., Coffey, E., Coffey, L., Crawford, E., Darcy, L., Fields, T., Lord, G., Steadman, B., & Colley, S. (2000). ‘Coming back’: Aborigines and archaeologists at Cuddie Springs. Public Archaeology, 1, 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Freeman, P. (1998). Tuggeranong Homestead Precinct Conservation Plan Review. Volume 1: Conservation analysis: Report. Moruya: Peter Freeman Pty Ltd: Conservation Architects and Planners.Google Scholar
  27. Gray, R. (1975). Six Southern Homesteads of Tuggeranong: Booroomba, Cuppacumbalong, Lambrigg, Lanyon, Tuggeranong and Woden. National Capital Development Commission, Heritage/Museums Unit: Canberra.Google Scholar
  28. Greer, S. (2010). Heritage and empowerment: Community-based Indigenous cultural heritage in northern Australia. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 16(1–2), 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Greer, S., Harrison, R., & McIntyre-Tamwoy, S. (2002). Community-based archaeology in Australia. World Archaeology, 34(2), 265–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Griebel, B. (2010). A conflict of interest: A case study for community archaeology in Nunavut, Canadian Arctic. Museum International, 62(1–2), 75–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Harrison, R. (2002). Shared histories and the archaeology of the pastoral industry in Australia. In R. Harrison & C. Williamson (Eds.), After Captain Cook: The archaeology of the recent Indigenous past in Australia (pp. 38–58). Sydney: Archaeological Computing Laboratory: University of Sydney.Google Scholar
  32. Heritage Act 2004 (ACT).Google Scholar
  33. Huys, S., & Collins S. (2013). Lanyon heritage precinct Aboriginal heritage investigations: Final report. Report for ACT Government by Cultural Heritage Management Australia.Google Scholar
  34. Kamminga, J. (1993). Assessment of disturbance of unregistered Aboriginal site PH13, Gungahlin, ACT: Report to Estate Development Section, ACT Government. Canberra: Kamminga and Associates.Google Scholar
  35. Kuskie, P. (1992). An archaeological investigation of two quarries and an open scatter at Gungahlin, ACT. A report to ACT Public Works.Google Scholar
  36. Marshall, Y. (2002). What is community archaeology? World Archaeology, 34(2), 211–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Marshall, D., Coltheart, L., G. Butler and Associates, J. Armes and Associates, Pearson, M., & Taylor, K. (2010). Lanyon Conservation Management Plan: Volume 1. Canberra: Cultural Facilities Corporation: ACT Historic Places.Google Scholar
  38. McIntyre-Tamwoy, S. (2004). Social value, the cultural component in natural resource management. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 11(4), 289–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McLeod Marketing & Management Pty Ltd. (2003). Tuggeranong Homestead Interpretation Plan. Report for Environment ACT: Canberra.Google Scholar
  40. McRae-Williams, M. S. (1984). Sites of significance in the Gungahlin, Tuggeranong and Upper Cotter Areas. National Capital Development Commission: Landscape and Environment Branch. Internal Technical Paper 7(84).Google Scholar
  41. Mitchell, M., Guilfoyle, D., Reynolds, R., & Morgan, C. (2013). Towards sustainable community heritage management and the role of archaeology: A case study from Western Australia. Heritage & Society, 6(1), 24–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Moser, S., Glazier, D., Phillips, J., Nasser el Nemr, L., Saleh Mousa, M., Nasr Aiesh, R., Richardson, S., Conner, A., & Seymour, M. (2002). Transforming archaeology through practice: Strategies for collaborative archaeology and the Community Archaeology Project at Quseir, Egypt. World Archaeology, 34(2), 220–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Moshenska, G., & Dhanjal, S. (Eds.). (2011). Community archaeology: Themes, methods and practices. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
  44. Mydland, L., & Grahn, W. (2012). Identifying heritage values in local communities. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 18(6), 564–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. National Capital Development Commission (NCDC). (1988a). Sites of significance in the ACT. Volume 3: Gungahlin and Belconnen. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  46. National Capital Development Commission (NCDC). (1988b). Sites of significance in the ACT. Volume 4: Woden, Tuggeranong & Associated Areas. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  47. Navin, K. (1993). Archaeological survey for Aboriginal sites: Tuggeranong Homestead, ACT. Report to Munns Sly Scott-Bohana Moss Pty Ltd.Google Scholar
  48. Navin Officer Heritage Consultants (NOHC). (2003). Red Hill, Gungahlin, Aboriginal camp site and ochre source, European mine and quarry site: Conservation and Management Plan, Interpretation and Implementation Plan. Report to Young Consulting Engineers for the Gungahlin Development Authority.Google Scholar
  49. Officer, K. (1995). Red Hill Aboriginal Campsite and Historic Mine, Gungahlin, ACT. Conservation and Management Plan. Report to the ACT Heritage Unit, DELP.Google Scholar
  50. Pocock, C., Collett, D., & Baulch, L. (2015). Assessing stories before sites: Identifying the tangible from the intangible. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 21(10), 962–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Prangnell, J., Ross, A., & Coghill, B. (2010). Power relations and community involvement in landscape-based cultural heritage management practice: An Australian case study. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 16(1–2), 140–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pyburn, K. A. (2008). Public Archaeology, Indiana Jones, and Honesty. Archaeologies: Journal of the World Archaeological Congress, 4(2), 201–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ricardi, P., Wright, D., Dowling, P., Haberle, S., Kamminga, J., Johnston, D., & Goyne, R. (2016, September). The Springbank Island Archaeological Project. Canberra Historical Journal, 2016, 33–39.Google Scholar
  54. Riley, W. E. (1831). Corobberie at Tuggranon Isabella Plains, 5 November 1831 (William Edward Riley Papers), ML MSS A109, (mfm CY 738), (Documents 1817-1856), p114.Google Scholar
  55. Ross, A., Ulm, S., & Tobane, B. (2013). Gummingurru – A community archaeology knowledge journey. Australian Archaeology, 76, 62–68.Google Scholar
  56. Silliman, S., & Ferguson, T. (2010). Consultation and collaboration with descendant communities. In Voices in American Archaeology: 75th Anniversary Volume of the Society for American Archaeology (pp. 48–72). Washington: Society for American Archaeology.Google Scholar
  57. Simpson, F., & Williams, H. (2008). Evaluating Community Archaeology in the UK. Public Archaeology, 7(2), 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Skitmore, S. (2016). Red Hill Camp: Prioritising Indigenous Communities in Inner City Community Archaeology. Australian National University Masters thesis, submitted October 2016.Google Scholar
  59. Skitmore, S., & House, M. (2017). Community archaeology at the Red Hill Camp, Griffith, ACT. Canberra Historical Journal, 79, 22–28.Google Scholar
  60. Skitmore, S., Wright, D., & House, M. (2019). Reclaiming space at Red Hill Camp: Community archaeology with urban indigenous groups. Journal of Community Archaeology and Heritage. Published online at  https://doi.org/10.1080/20518196.2019.1578469
  61. Smith, A., & Beck, W. (2003). The archaeology of No Man’s land: Indigenous camps at Corindi Beach, mid-north coast of New South Wales. Archaeology in Oceania, 38, 66–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Smith, L., Morgan, A., & van der Meer, A. (2003). Community-driven research in Cultural Heritage Management: The Waanyi Women’s History Project. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 9(1), 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Symonds, J. (2004). Historical archaeology and the recent urban past. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 10(1), 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tully, G. (2007). Community archaeology: General methods and standards of practice. Public Archaeology, 6(3), 155–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Waterton, E., & Smith, L. (2010). The recognition and misrecognition of community heritage. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 16(1–2), 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Winston-Gregson, J. (1985). Lanyon Historic Area: Archaeological Field Survey June 1985. Report to the Department of Territories for Access Archaeology Pty Ltd.Google Scholar
  67. Wright, A. (2015). Private property, public archaeology: Resident communities as stakeholders in American archaeology. World Archaeology, 47(2), 212–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zarmati, L. (2015). Archaeology as Pedagogy at Sydney’s ‘The Big Dig’. The Historic Environment: Policy and Practice, 6(2), 177–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bridget San Miguel
    • 1
  • Matilda House
    • 2
  1. 1.Extent HeritageSydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Australian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations