Advertisement

Systemic Risk and the Ripple Effect in the Supply Chain

  • Kevin P. ScheibeEmail author
  • Jennifer Blackhurst
Chapter
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 276)

Abstract

Supply chains are highly complex systems, and disruptions may ripple through these systems in unexpected ways, but they may also start in unexpected ways. We investigate the causes of ripple effect through the lens of systemic risk. We derive supply chain systemic risk from the finance discipline where sources of risk are found in systemic risk-taking, contagion, and amplification mechanisms. In a supply chain context, we identify three dimensions that influence systemic risk, the nature of a disruption, the structure, and dependency of the supply chain, and the decision-making. Within these three dimensions, there are several factors including correlation of risk, compounding effects, cyclical linkages, counterparty risk, herding behavior, and misaligned incentives. These factors are often invisible to decision makers, and they may operate in tandem to exacerbate ripple effect. We highlight these systemic risks, and we encourage further research to understand their nature and to mitigate their effect.

References

  1. Acharya, V. V. (2009). A theory of systemic risk and design of prudential bank regulation. Journal of Financial Stability, 5(3), 224–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acharya, V. V., & Engle, R. (2009). Derivatives trades should all be transparent. Wall Street Journal, 15.Google Scholar
  3. Ackermann, F., Eden, C., Williams, T., & Howick, S. (2007). Systemic risk assessment: A case study. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58(1), 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Agca, S., Babich, V., Birge, J., & Wu, J. (2017). Credit risk propagation along supply chains: Evidence from the CDS market. Georgetown McDonough School of Business Research Paper No. 3078752.Google Scholar
  5. Barsade, S. G. (2002). The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4), 644–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Basole, R. C., & Bellamy, M. A. (2014). Supply network structure, visibility, and risk diffusion: A computational approach. Decision Sciences, 45(4), 753–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benoit, S., Colliard, J.-E., Hurlin, C., & Pérignon, C. (2017). Where the risks lie: A survey on systemic risk. Review of Finance, 21(1), 109–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhatia, G., Lane, C., & Wain, A. (2013). Building resilience in supply chains. Paper presented at the World Economic Forum.Google Scholar
  9. Black, S. (2001). Computing ripple effect for software maintenance. Journal of Software Maintenance Evolution: Research Practice, 13(4), 263–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Black, S. (2006). Is ripple effect intuitive? A pilot study. Innovations in Systems Software Engineering, 2(2), 88–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blackhurst, J. V., Scheibe, K. P., & Johnson, D. J. (2008). Supplier risk assessment and monitoring for the automotive industry. International Journal of Physical Distribution Logistics Management, 38(2), 143–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chopra, S., & Sodhi, M. S. (2004). Managing risk to avoid supply chain breakdown. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46, 53–61.Google Scholar
  13. Dolgui, A., Ivanov, D., & Sokolov, B. (2018). Ripple effect in the supply chain: An analysis and recent literature. International Journal of Production Research, 56(1–2), 414–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eisenberg, L., & Noe, T. H. (2001). Systemic risk in financial systems. Management Science, 47(2), 236–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gremler, D. D., & Brown, S. W. (1999). The loyalty ripple effect: Appreciating the full value of customers. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 10(3), 271–293.  https://doi.org/10.1108/09564239910276872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haney, F. M. (1972). Module connection analysis: A tool for scheduling software debugging activities. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 5–7 December 1972, Fall joint computer conference, part I.Google Scholar
  17. Hearnshaw, E. J., & Wilson, M. M. (2013). A complex network approach to supply chain network theory. International Journal of Operations Production Management, 33(4), 442–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ivanov, D., Sokolov, B., & Dolgui, A. (2014). The Ripple effect in supply chains: Trade-off ‘efficiency-flexibility-resilience’ in disruption management. International Journal of Production Research, 52(7), 2154–2172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kambhu, J., Weidman, S., & Krishnan, N. (2007). New directions for understanding systemic risk: A report on a conference cosponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and the National Academy of Sciences. Washington D.C.: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kaufman, G. G., & Scott, K. E. (2003). What is systemic risk, and do bank regulators retard or contribute to it? The Independent Review, 7(3), 371–391.Google Scholar
  21. Levi, D. S., Vassiladis, C., & Kyratzoglou, I. (2013). Supply chain and risk management: Making the right risk decisions to strengthen operations performance. Retrieved from PwC and the MIT Forum for Supply Chain Innovation.Google Scholar
  22. Meen, G. (1999). Regional house prices and the ripple effect: A new interpretation. Housing studies, 14(6), 733–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Narayanan, V. G., & Raman, A. (2004). Aligning incentives in supply chains. Harvard Business Review, 82(11), 94–102.Google Scholar
  24. Scheibe, K. P., & Blackhurst, J. (2018). Supply chain disruption propagation: a systemic risk and normal accident theory perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 56(1–2), 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sheffi, Y. (2015). The power of resilience: How the best companies manage the unexpected. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wood, L. J., Giles-Corti, B., Bulsara, M. K., & Bosch, D. A. (2007). More than a furry companion: The ripple effect of companion animals on neighborhood interactions and sense of community. Society Animals, 15(1), 43–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yau, S. S., Collofello, J. S., & MacGregor, T. (1978). Ripple effect analysis of software maintenance. Paper presented at the COMPSAC.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Supply Chain & Information Systems, Ivy College of BusinessIowa State UniversityAmesUSA
  2. 2.Henry B. Tippie Research Fellow Tippe College of BusinessThe University of IowaIowa CityUSA

Personalised recommendations