Advertisement

Resilience and Agility: The Crucial Properties of Humanitarian Supply Chain

  • Rameshwar DubeyEmail author
Chapter
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 276)

Abstract

In this chapter, we theorize and test a model to study the impact of agility and resilience on humanitarian supply chain performance. Here, supply chain agility and supply chain resilience are explained based on existing literature. We have undertaken an extensive literature review to build up the theory and further tested the theory using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The multivariate statistical analyses suggest that supply chain agility is an important property of pre-disaster performance, and supply chain resilience is an important property of the post-disaster performance, in humanitarian supply chain network. The present study attempts to further existing literature, and outlines limitations and further research directions.

Keywords

Agility Resilience Disaster relief supply chain Moderating regression 

References

  1. Abidi, H., de Leeuw, S., & Klumpp, M. (2013). Measuring success in humanitarian supply chains. International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 2(8), 31–39.Google Scholar
  2. Abidi, H., de Leeuw, S., & Klumpp, M. (2014). Humanitarian supply chain performance management: A systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(5/6), 592–608.Google Scholar
  3. Altay, N., Gunasekaran, A., Dubey, R., & Childe, S. J. (2018). Agility and resilience as antecedents of supply chain performance under moderating effects of organizational culture within the humanitarian setting: A dynamic capability view. Production Planning & Control, 1–17.Google Scholar
  4. Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 396–402.Google Scholar
  5. Aslam, H., Blome, C., Roscoe, S., & Azhar, T. M. (2018). Dynamic supply chain capabilities: How market sensing, supply chain agility and adaptability affect supply chain ambidexterity. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(12), 2266–2285.Google Scholar
  6. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173.Google Scholar
  7. Barriball, K. L., & While, A. E. (1999). Non-response in survey research: A methodological discussion and development of an explanatory model. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 30(3), 667–686.Google Scholar
  8. Beamon, B. M., & Balcik, B. (2008). Performance measurement in humanitarian relief chains. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21(1), 4–25.Google Scholar
  9. Bhamra, R., Dani, S., & Burnard, K. (2011). Resilience: The concept, a literature review and future directions. International Journal of Production Research, 49(18), 5375–5393.Google Scholar
  10. Bhattacharya, S., Hasija, S., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2014). Designing efficient infrastructural investment and asset transfer mechanisms in humanitarian supply chains. Production and Operations Management., 23(9), 1511–1521.Google Scholar
  11. Blome, C., Schoenherr, T., & Rexhausen, D. (2013). Antecedents and enablers of supply chain agility and its effect on performance: A dynamic capabilities perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 51(4), 1295–1318.Google Scholar
  12. Boin, A., Kelle, P., & Whybark, D. C. (2010). Resilient supply chain for extreme situations: Outlining a new field of study. International Journal of Production Economics, 126(1), 1–6.Google Scholar
  13. Braunscheidel, M. J., & Suresh, N. C. (2009). The organizational antecedents of a firm’s supply chain agility for risk mitigation and response. Journal of Operations Management, 27(2), 119–140.Google Scholar
  14. Braunscheidel, M. J., Suresh, N. C., & Boisnier, A. D. (2010a). Investigating the impact of organizational culture on supply chain integration. Human Resource Management, 49(5), 883–911.Google Scholar
  15. Braunscheidel, M. J., Suresh, N. C., & Boisnier, A. D. (2010b). Investigating the impact of organizational culture on supply chain integration. Human Resource Management, 49(5), 883–911.Google Scholar
  16. Braziotis, C., Bourlakis, M., Rogers, H., & Tannock, J. (2013). Supply chains and supply networks: Distinctions and overlaps. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 18(6), 644–652.Google Scholar
  17. Bruneau, M., Chang, S. E., Eguchi, R. T., Lee, G. C., O’Rourke, T. D., Reinhorn, A. M., et al. (2003). A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities. Earthquake Spectra, 19(4), 733–752.Google Scholar
  18. Burnard, K., & Bhamra, R. (2011). Organisational resilience: Development of a conceptual framework for organisational responses. International Journal of Production Research, 49(18), 5581–5599.Google Scholar
  19. Cadden, T., Marshall, D., & Cao, G. (2013). Opposites attract: Organizational culture and supply chain performance. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 18(1), 86–103.Google Scholar
  20. Charles, A., Lauras, M., & Wassenhove, L. V. (2010). A model to define and assess the agility of supply chains: Building on humanitarian experience. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 40(8), 722–741.Google Scholar
  21. Childs, A. K. (2013). Cultural theory and acceptance-based security strategies for humanitarian aid workers. Journal of Strategic Security, 6(1), 64–72.Google Scholar
  22. Christopher, M. (2000). The agile supply chain: Competing in volatile markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(1), 37–44.Google Scholar
  23. Christopher, M., & Towill, D. (2001). An integrated model for the design of agile supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 31(4), 235–246.Google Scholar
  24. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2013). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  25. Cozzolino, A., Rossi, S., & Conforti, A. (2012). Agile and Lean principles in the humanitarian supply chain. The case of the United Nations world food programme. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 2(1), 16–33.Google Scholar
  26. Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to non normality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 16–29.Google Scholar
  27. Dai, H., Lin, J., & Long, Q. (2014). A fractal perspective-based methodological framework for supply chain modelling and distributed simulation with multi-agent system. International Journal of Production Research, (ahead-of-print), 1–22.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.919414.Google Scholar
  28. Day, J. M. (2014). Fostering emergent resilience: The complex adaptive supply network of disaster relief. International Journal of Production Research, 52(7), 1970–1988.Google Scholar
  29. Detert, J. R., Schroeder, R. G., & Mauriel, J. J. (2000). A framework for linking culture and improvement initiatives in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 850–863.Google Scholar
  30. Dolgui, A., Ivanov, D., & Sokolov, B. (2018). Ripple effect in the supply chain: An analysis and recent literature. International Journal of Production Research, 56(1–2), 414–430.Google Scholar
  31. Douglas, M. (1999). Four cultures: The evolution of a parsimonious model. GeoJournal, 47(3), 411–415.Google Scholar
  32. Dubey, R., & Gunasekaran, A. (2016). The sustainable humanitarian supply chain design: Agility, adaptability and alignment. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 19(1), 62–82.Google Scholar
  33. Dubey, R., Altay, N., Gunasekaran, A., Blome, C., Papadopoulos, T., & Childe, S. J. (2018a). Supply chain agility, adaptability and alignment: Empirical evidence from the Indian auto components industry. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(1), 129–148.Google Scholar
  34. Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., & Childe, S. J. (2018b). Big data analytics capability in supply chain agility: The moderating effect of organizational flexibility. Management Decision.  https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-01-2018-0119.
  35. Duran, S., Gutierrez, M. A., & Keskinocak, P. (2011). Pre-positioning of emergency items for CARE international. Interfaces, 41(3), 223–237.Google Scholar
  36. FEMA. (2008). The disaster process & disaster aid programs. Retrieved July 16, 2013, from https://www.fema.gov/disaster-process-disaster-aid-programs.
  37. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.Google Scholar
  38. Gunasekaran, A., Dubey, R., Fosso Wamba, S., Papadopoulos, T., Hazen, B. T., & Ngai, E. W. (2018). Bridging humanitarian operations management and organisational theory. International Journal of Production Research, 56(21), 6735–6740.Google Scholar
  39. Halldorsson, A., Kotzab, H., Mikkola, J. H., & Skjøtt-Larsen, T. (2007). Complementary theories to supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 12(4), 284–296.Google Scholar
  40. Hearnshaw, E. J., & Wilson, M. M. (2013). A complex network approach to supply chain network theory. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 33(4), 442–469.Google Scholar
  41. Holguin-Veras, J., Jaller, M., Wassenhove, L. V., Perez, N. & Watchtendorf, T. (2012). On the unique features of post-disaster humanitarian logistics. Journal of Operations Management, 30(6), 494–506.Google Scholar
  42. Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.Google Scholar
  43. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.Google Scholar
  44. Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2018). Low-Certainty-Need (LCN) supply chains: A new perspective in managing disruption risks and resilience. International Journal of Production Research, 1–18.Google Scholar
  45. Ivanov, D., & Sokolov, B. (2013). Control and system-theoretic identification of the supply chain dynamics domain for planning, analysis and adaptation of performance under uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research, 224(2), 313–323.Google Scholar
  46. Ivanov, D., Sokolov, B., & Kaschel, J. (2013). Adaptation-based supply chain resilence. In M. Essig et al. (Eds.), Supply chain safety management (pp. 267–287). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  47. Ivanov, D., Sokolov, B., & Dolgui, A. (2014). The ripple effect in supply chains: Trade-off ‘efficiency-flexibility-resilience’ in disruption management. International Journal of Production Research, 52(7), 2154–2172.Google Scholar
  48. Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., Sokolov, B., & Ivanova, M. (2017). Literature review on disruption recovery in the supply chain. International Journal of Production Research, 55(20), 6158–6174.Google Scholar
  49. Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., & Sokolov, B. (2018). Scheduling of recovery actions in the supply chain with resilience analysis considerations. International Journal of Production Research, 56(19), 6473–6490.Google Scholar
  50. Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., & Sokolov, B. (2019). The impact of digital technology and Industry 4.0 on the ripple effect and supply chain risk analytics. International Journal of Production Research, 57(3), 829–846.Google Scholar
  51. Kovacs, G., & Spens, K. M. (2007). Humanitarian logistics in disaster relief operations. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 37(2), 99–114.Google Scholar
  52. Lee, H. L. (2002). Aligning supply chain strategies with product uncertainties. California Management Review, 44(3), 105–119.Google Scholar
  53. Lee, H. L. (2004). The triple-A supply chain. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 102–112.Google Scholar
  54. Li, X., Chung, C., Goldsby, T. J. & Holsapple, C. W. (2008). A unified model of supply chain agility: The work-design perspective. International Journal of Logistics Management, 19(3), 408–435.Google Scholar
  55. Li, X., Goldsby, T. J., & Holsapple, C. W. (2009). Supply chain agility: Scale development. International Journal of Logistics Management, 20(3), 408–424.Google Scholar
  56. Maon, F., Lindgreen, A., & Vanhamme, J. (2009). Developing supply chains in disaster relief operations through cross-sector socially oriented collaborations: A theoretical model. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(2), 149–164.Google Scholar
  57. McDermott, C. M., & Stock, G. N. (1999). Organizational culture and advanced manufacturing technology implementation. Journal of Operations Management, 17(5), 521–533.Google Scholar
  58. Melnyk, S. A., Narasimhan, R., & DeCampos, H. A. (2014). Supply chain design: Issues, challenges, frameworks and solutions. International Journal of Production Research, 52(7), 1887–1896.Google Scholar
  59. Mitra, S., & Singhal, V. (2008). Supply chain integration and shareholder value: Evidence from consortium based industry exchanges. Journal of Operations Management, 26(1), 96–114.Google Scholar
  60. Nagurney, A., & Qiang, Q. (2009). A relative total cost index for the evaluation of transportation network robustness in the presence of degradable links and alternative travel behavior. International Transactions in Operational Research, 16(1), 49–67.Google Scholar
  61. Nagurney, A., Yu, M., & Qiang, Q. (2011). Supply chain network design for critical needs with outsourcing. Papers in Regional Science, 90(1), 123–142.Google Scholar
  62. Needle, D. (1994). Business in context: An introduction to business and its environment. Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  63. Oloruntoba, R., & Gray, R. (2006). Humanitarian aid: an agile supply chain? Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 11(2), 115–120.Google Scholar
  64. Pettit, S., & Beresford, A. (2009). Critical success factors in the context of humanitarian aid supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 39(6), 450–468.Google Scholar
  65. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, N. P., & Lee, J. Y. (2003). The mismeasure of man (agement) and its implications for leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(6), 615–656.Google Scholar
  66. Ravasi, D., & Schultz, M. (2006). Responding to organizational identity threats: Exploring the role of organizational culture. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 433–458.Google Scholar
  67. Richey, R. G., Jr. (2009). The supply chain crisis and disaster pyramid: A theoretical framework for understanding preparedness and recovery. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 39(7), 619–628.Google Scholar
  68. Scholten, K., Scott, P., & Fynes, B. (2014). Mitigation processes–antecedents for building supply chain resilience. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(2), 8.Google Scholar
  69. Sheffi, Y. (2005). The resilient enterprise: Overcoming vulnerability for competitive advantage. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  70. Swafford, P. M., Ghosh, S., & Murthy, N. (2006). The antecedents of supply chain agility of a firm: Scale development and model testing. Journal of Operations Management, 24(2), 70–88.Google Scholar
  71. Tatham, P., & Kovács, G. (2010). The application of “swift trust” to humanitarian logistics. International Journal of Production Economics, 126(1), 35–45.Google Scholar
  72. Tierney, K., & Bruneau, M. (2007). Conceptualizing and measuring resilience: A key to disaster loss reduction. TR News, 250(May-June), 14–17.Google Scholar
  73. Trunick, P. A. (2005). Special report: Delivering relief to tsunami victims. Logistics Today, 46(2), 1–3.Google Scholar
  74. United States Congress (2000). Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-106publ390/pdf/PLAW-106publ390.pdf. Accessed 18 February 2014.
  75. Vlachos, D., Iakovou, E., Papapanagiotou, K., & Partsch, D. (2012). Building robust supply chains by reducing vulnerability and improving resilience. International Journal of Agile Systems and Management, 5(1), 59–81.Google Scholar
  76. Wassenhove, L. V. (2006). Humanitarian aid logistics: Supply chain management in high gear. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57(5), 475–489.Google Scholar
  77. World Economic Forum. (2013). Building resilience in supply chains (REF150). Retrieved March 13, 2013, from http://www.weforum.org/reports/building-resilience-supply-chains.
  78. Yusuf, Y. Y., Gunasekaran, A., Adeleye, E. O., & Sivayoganathan, K. (2004). Agile supply chain capabilities: Determinants of competitive objectives. European Journal of Operational Research, 159(2), 379–392.Google Scholar
  79. Zobel, C. (2011a). Representing the multi-dimensional nature of disaster resilience. In Proceedings of the 8th International ISCRAM Conference–Lisbon, Portugal.Google Scholar
  80. Zobel, C. W. (2011b). Representing perceived tradeoffs in defining disaster resilience. Decision Support Systems, 50(2), 394–403.Google Scholar
  81. Zobel, C. W., & Khansa, L. (2014). Characterizing multi-event disaster resilience. Computers & Operations Research, 42, 83–94.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Montpellier Business SchoolMontpellierFrance

Personalised recommendations