• Úna BarrEmail author
Part of the Critical Criminological Perspectives book series (CCRP)


This chapter firstly provides a critical analysis of current (neo)liberal reform of the Criminal Justice System (CJS), in particular that which relates to women. In June 2018, the Home Office published their Female Offenders Strategy, which argued for ‘earlier intervention, an emphasis on community-based solutions, and an aim to make custody effective and decent as possible for those who have to be there’ (Ministry of Justice, Female Offender Strategy. London: Ministry of Justice, 2018a: 3). This chapter examines this document through a critical, abolitionist lens. Influenced by the work of Pat Carlen, almost 30 years ago (Alternatives to Women’s Imprisonment. Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1990), this chapter argues for a woman-wise community-based penology which is both utopian and pragmatic, and examines what this might entail. Finally, some methodological implications and conclusions are posed.


Female offenders strategy Community-based Woman-wise penology Abolitionism 


  1. Alston, P. (2018). Statement on Visit to the United Kingdom, By Professor Philip Alston, United Nations Special Rapporteur on Extreme Poverty and Human Rights. Available at: Accessed 27 Dec 2018.
  2. Burke, L. (2013). Grayling’s Hubris. Probation Journal, 60, 377–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carlen, P. (1990). Alternatives to Women’s Imprisonment. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Corston, J. (2007). The Corston Report: A Report by Baroness Jean Corston of a Review of Women with Particular Vulnerabilities in the Criminal Justice System. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  5. Day, A. (2018). Universal Credit: Prisoners ‘Lured Back Into Crime’ By Benefit Delays. Huffington Post. Available at: Accessed 27 Dec 2018.
  6. Farrall, S. (2002). Rethinking What Works with Offenders. Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
  7. Field, F. (2018). The Climbdown on Universal Credit Is Painfully Inadequate. The Guardian. Available at: Accessed 27 Dec 2018.
  8. Gelsthorpe, L., & Morris, A. (1988). Feminism and Criminology in Britain. British Journal of Criminology, 28(2), 93–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Graham, H., & McIvor, G. (2015). Scottish and International Review of the Use of Electronic Monitoring (Report No. 8). Scottish Centre for Crime and Justice Research.Google Scholar
  10. Hart, E. L. (2017). Prisoners Post-Release, The Need for a Critical Desistance. In E. L. Hart & F. J. C. Van Ginneken (Eds.), New Perspectives on Desistance. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Homelessness Reduction Act. (2017). Available at: Accessed 12 Mar 2019.
  12. Joseph Rowntree Foundation. (2018). UK Poverty 2018: A Comprehensive Analysis of Poverty Trends and Figures. London: JRF Analysis Unit.Google Scholar
  13. Lightowler, C. (2018). Drunk Women Convicted of Assault Treated Harsher in Sentencing Than Drunk Men [Blog]. The Conversation. Available at: Accessed 27 Dec 2018.
  14. Mansfield, M., & Cooper, V. (2016). The Failure to Protect Women in the Criminal Justice System. In V. Cooper & D. Whyte (Eds.), The Violence of Austerity. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  15. Maruna, S. (2001). Making Good – How Ex-Convicts Reform and Rebuild Their Lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Matthews, R., Easton, H., Reynolds, L., Bindel, J., & Young, L. (2014). Exiting Prostitution. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McNeill, F. (2016). The Fuel in the Tank or the Hole in the Boat? Can Sanctions Support Desistance. In J. Shapland, S. Farrall, & A. Bottoms (Eds.), Global Perspectives on Desistance: Rethinking What We Know and Looking to the Future (pp. 265–281). Routledge: Oxford.Google Scholar
  18. McNeill, F. (2017). Post-script: Guide, Guard and Glue – Electronic Monitoring and Penal Supervision. European Journal of Probation, 9(1), 103–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government. (2018). Statutory Homelessness and Prevention and Relief, January to March (Q1) 2018: England. London: Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government.Google Scholar
  20. Ministry of Justice. (2018a). Female Offender Strategy. London: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
  21. Ministry of Justice. (2018b). Offender Management Statistics Bulletin, England and Wales. London: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
  22. Ministry of Justice. (2018c). Women and the Criminal Justice System 2017 Statistics. London: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
  23. Ministry of Justice. (2018d). Safety in Custody Quarterly: Update to June 2018. London: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
  24. Ministry of Justice. (2018e). Deaths of Offenders in the Community. London: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
  25. Österman, L. (2018). Penal Cultures and Female Desistance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Price, J. M. (2015). Prison and Social Death. New Brunswick/London: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Prison Reform Trust. (2017). Why Focus on Reducing Women’s Imprisonment? London: Prison Reform Trust.Google Scholar
  28. Roberts, J. (2015a). ‘It Was Do or Die’ – How a Woman’s Experience of Domestic Abuse Can Influence Her Involvement in Crime: A Qualitative Investigation of the Experiences of Community-Based Female Offenders. Doctoral Thesis, University of Leicester, Leicester.Google Scholar
  29. Roberts, R. (2015b). Is Lady Justice Blind or Just Blinkered. In H. Mills, R. Roberts, & L. Townhead (Eds.), Empower, Resist, Transform: A Collection of Essays (pp. 9–11). London: Centre for Crime and Justice Studies.Google Scholar
  30. Sanders, T., & Platt, L. (2017). Is Sex Work Still the Most Dangerous Profession? The Data Suggests So [Blog]. The Conversation. Available at: Accessed 27 Dec 2018.
  31. Sim, J. (2018). We Are All (Neo-)Liberals Now: Reform and the Prison Crisis in England and Wales Justice. Power and Resistance, 1, 165–188.Google Scholar
  32. Sisters Uncut. (2018). Women’s Residential Centres – Another Dangerous Distraction [Blog]. Sisters Uncut. Available at: Accessed 27 Dec 2018.
  33. The Howard League. (2016). Is This the End of Women’s Centres? London: All Party Parliamentary Group for Women.Google Scholar
  34. User Voice. (2016). “Transforming Rehabilitation”: The Operational Model from the Service User’s Perspective. London: National Audit Office.Google Scholar
  35. Women’s Budget Group, Surviving Economic Abuse & the End Violence Against Women Coalition. (2018). Universal Credit Risks Increasing Women’s Vulnerability to Abuse. Available at: Accessed 27 Dec 2018.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Humanities and Social ScienceLiverpool John Moores UniversityLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations