Advertisement

Making the Invisible Visible

  • Úna BarrEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Critical Criminological Perspectives book series (CCRP)

Abstract

This chapter draws together some of the findings from the previous chapters and considers a structural approach to desistance which challenges both patriarchy and neoliberalism as well as other systemic inequalities such as neocolonialism, racism and heteronormativity. The chapter considers the personal experiences of the women’s lives to be political, linking, for example, interpersonal relationships to the structural violence of austerity which has led to the decimation of domestic violence services and mental health services. The presence or absence of agency in the lives of criminalised women is explored. Agency and subordination, it is argued, can exist simultaneously in both offending and desistance experiences. The chapter argues that abolitionist arguments are compatible with desistance theory and practice and makes the case that interstitial strategies can be employed to support women’s desistance, outside the punitive Criminal Justice System. The chapter concludes that desistance from crime should be reframed, both theoretically and in practice, as desistance from harm. In desisting from harm, therefore, women are actively resisting patriarchal and neoliberal structures.

Keywords

Patriarchy Neoliberalism Agency Abolitionism Social harm 

Bibliography

  1. Balfour, G., Hannah-Moffat, K., & Turnbull, S. (2018). Planning for Precarity? Experiencing the Carceral Continuum of Imprisonment and Reentry. In A. Sarat (Ed.), After Imprisonment Studies in Law, Politics and Society (Vol. 77, pp. 31–48). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  2. Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, Shame and Reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Browne, V. (2014). The Persistence of Patriarchy: Operation Yewtree and the Return to 1970s Feminism. Radical Philosophy, 188, 9–20.Google Scholar
  4. Carlen, P. (1990). Alternatives to Women’s Imprisonment. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Carlen, P. (2006). Review: Out of Order: The Political Imprisonment of Women in Northern Ireland 1972–1998. The British Journal of Criminology, 46(5), 951–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carlen, P. (2012). Against Rehabilitation: For Reparative Justice. Centre for Crime and Justice Studies. Available at: https://www.crimeandjustice.org.uk/resources/against-rehabilitation-reparative-justice. Accessed 27 Dec 2018.
  7. Carlsson, C. (2012). Processes of Intermittency in Criminal Careers: Notes from a Swedish Study on Life Courses and Crime. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 57(8), 913–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carlsson, C. (2016). Human Agency, Criminal Careers and Desistance. In J. Shapland, S. Farrall, & A. Bottoms (Eds.), Global Perspectives on Desistance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Carlton, B., & Baldry, E. (2013). In B. Carlton & M. Segrave (Eds.), Women Exiting Prison: Critical Essays on Gender, Post-Release Support and Survival. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clarke, B., & Chadwick, K. (2018). From ‘Troubled’ Women to Failing Institutions: Necessary Narrative Shifts in Decarceration of Women Post-Corston. In L. Moore, P. Scraton, & A. Wahidin (Eds.), Women’s Imprisonment and the Case for Abolition: Critical Reflections on Corston Ten Years On. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Clarke, R. V., & Cornish, D. B. (1985). Modelling Offenders’ Decisions: A Framework for Research and Policy. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research (Vol. 6). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Coles, D. (2018). INQUEST Responds to New Ministry of Justice ‘Female Offenders Strategy [Blog]’. INQUEST Available at: https://www.inquest.org.uk/moj-female-offenders-response. Accessed 27 Dec 2018.
  13. Dorling, D. (2015). Inequality and the 1%. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  14. Farrall, S. (2002). Rethinking What Works with Offenders. Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
  15. Fraser, N. (2013). How Feminism Became Capitalism’s Handmaiden. The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/oct/14/feminism-capitalist-handmaiden-neoliberal. Accessed 27 Dec 2018.
  16. Gottfredson, M., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A General Theory of Crime. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Graham, H., & McNeill, F. (2018). Desistance: Envisioning Futures. In P. Carlen & L. Ayres França (Eds.), Alternative Criminologies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Haney, L. (2004). Introduction: Gender, Welfare, and States of Punishment. Social Politics, 11(3), 333–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hanisch, C. (1970). The Personal Is Political. In S. Firestone & A. Koedt (Eds.), Notes from the Second Year: Women’s Liberation. New York: Radical Feminist.Google Scholar
  20. Hart, E. L. (2017). Prisoners Post-Release, The Need for a Critical Desistance. In E. L. Hart & F. J. C. Van Ginneken (Eds.), New Perspectives on Desistance. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harvey, D. (2007). A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Heidensohn, F., & Silvestri, M. (2012). Gender and Crime. In M. Maguire, R. Morgan, & R. Reiner (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Criminology (pp. 336–369).Google Scholar
  23. Hillyard, P., Pantazis, C., Tombs, S., & Gordon, D. (2004). Beyond Criminology: Taking Harm Seriously. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  24. hooks, b. (2004). The Will to Change: Men, Masculinity, and Love. London: Atria Books.Google Scholar
  25. Horney, J., Osgood, D. W., & Marshall, I. H. (1995). Criminal Careers in the Short Term: Intra Individual Variability in Crime and its Relation to Local Life Circumstances. American Sociological Review, 60(5), 655–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. House of Commons Justice Committee. (2018). Transforming Rehabilitation: Ninth Report of Session 2017–2019. London: The Stationery Office Limited.Google Scholar
  27. Inquest.org.uk. (2018). Deaths of Women in Prison. INQUEST [online]. Available at: http://inquest.org.uk/statistics/deaths-of-women-in-prison. Accessed 27 Dec 2018.
  28. Jacobson, M. P. (2016). Tough Talk on Crime Has Led to a Crisis in Britain’s Prisons. The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/may/05/tough-talk-crime-crisis-britains-prisons-suicides-assaults. Accessed 5 Jan 2019.
  29. Joseph Rowntree Foundation. (2018). UK Poverty 2018: A Comprehensive Analysis of Poverty Trends and Figures. London: JRF Analysis Unit.Google Scholar
  30. Laub, J., & Sampson, R. (2003). Shared Beginnings, Divergent Lives. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  31. LeBaron, G., & Roberts, A. (2010). Towards a Feminist Political Economy of Capitalism and Carcerality. Signs, 36(1), 19–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mansfield, M., & Cooper, V. (2016). The Failure to Protect Women in the Criminal Justice System. In V. Cooper & D. Whyte (Eds.), The Violence of Austerity. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  33. Maruna, S. (2001). Making Good – How Ex-Convicts Reform and Rebuild Their Lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Matthews, R., Easton, H., Reynolds, L., Bindel, J., & Young, L. (2014). Exiting Prostitution. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McIvor, G., Murray, C., & Jamieson, J. (2011). Desistance from Crime: Is It Different for Women and Girls? In S. Maruna & R. Immarigeon (Eds.), After Crime and Punishment: Pathways to Offender Reintegration. Willan: Cullompton.Google Scholar
  36. Ministry of Justice. (2018). Female Offender Strategy. London: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
  37. Morrissey, B. (2003). When Women Kill: Questions of Agency and Subjectivity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Österman, L. (2018). Penal Cultures and Female Desistance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Pantazis, C. (2004). Gendering Harm Through a Life-Course Perspective. In P. Hillyard, C. Pantazis, S. Tombs, & D. Gordon (Eds.), Beyond Criminology: Taking Harm Seriously. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  40. Patterson, O. (1982). Slavery and Social Death. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Pollack, S. (2013). An Imprisoning Gaze: Practices of Gendered, Racialized and Epistemic Violence. International Review of Victimology, 19(1), 103–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Price, J. M. (2015). Prison and Social Death. New Brunswick/London: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Prison Reform Trust. (2014). Transforming Lives: Reducing Women’s Imprisonment. Stockport: Soroptimist International.Google Scholar
  44. Prison Reform Trust. (2017). Why Focus on Reducing Women’s Imprisonment? London: Prison Reform Trust.Google Scholar
  45. Reiner, R. (2007). Neoliberalism, Crime and Justice. In R. Roberts & W. McMahon (Eds.), Social Justice and Criminal Justice. London: Centre for Crime and Justice Studies.Google Scholar
  46. Rich, A. (1996). Of Woman Born – Motherhood as Experience and Institution (3rd ed.). New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  47. Rodermond, E., Kruttschnitt, C., Slotboom, A. M., & Bijieveld, C. C. J. H. (2016). Female Desistance: A Review of the Literature. European Journal of Criminology, 13(1), 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rumgay, J. (2004). Scripts for Safer Survival: Pathways Out of Female Crime. The Howard Journal, 43(4), 405–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1992). Crime and Deviance in the Life Course. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 63–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Savage, M. (2018). Private Probation Firms Fail to Cut Rates of Reoffending. The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/feb/03/private-firms-fail-cut-rates-reoffending-low-medium-risk-offenders. Accessed 5 Jan 2019.
  51. Shover, N. (1996). Great Pretenders: Pursuits and Careers of Persistent Thieves. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
  52. Sisters Uncut. (2018). Women’s Residential Centres – Another Dangerous Distraction [Blog]. Sisters Uncut. Available at: http://www.sistersuncut.org/2018/07/06/community-prisons/. Accessed 27 Dec 2018.
  53. Sommers, E. K. (1995). Voices From Within, Women Who Have Broken the Law. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stone, R. (2016). Desistance and Identity Repair: Redemption Narratives as Resistance to Stigma. British Journal of Criminology, 56(5), 956–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. The Bach Commission. (2017). The Right to Justice: The Final Report of the Bach Commission. London: Fabian Society.Google Scholar
  56. Thomas, R., & Davies, A. (2005). What Have the Feminists Done for Us? Feminist Theory and Organizational Resistance. Organization, 12(5), 711–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Verbruggen, J., Blokland, A. A. J., & Van Der Geest, V. R. (2012). Effects of Employment and Unemployment on Serious Offending in a High-Risk Sample of Men and Women from Ages 18 to 32 in the Netherlands. British Journal of Criminology, 52(5), 845–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wacquant, L. (2018). Prisoner Re-entry as Myth and Ceremony. In P. Carlen & L. Ayres França (Eds.), Alternative Criminologies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  59. Watts, J. (2018). No Wonder People on Benefits Live in Fear. Supermarkets Spy on Them Now. The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/may/31/benefits-claimants-fear-supermarkets-spy-poor-disabled. Accessed 27 Dec 2018.
  60. Weaver, B., & McNeill, F. (2010). Changing Lives? Desistance Research and Offender Management (3rd ed.). Glasgow: The Scottish Centre for Crime and Research.Google Scholar
  61. Wilkinson, A., & Pickett, K. (2010). The Spirit Level: Why Equality Is Better for Everyone. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  62. Worrall, A. (1990). Offending Women: Female Lawbreakers and the CJS. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Humanities and Social ScienceLiverpool John Moores UniversityLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations