Having examined three thematic explanations for desistance, this chapter moves on to consider interventions by the Criminal Justice System (CJS). In particular, the chapter examines the criminal justice paradigm ‘Transforming Rehabilitation’ (TR) and its links to ‘Payment by Results’ (PbR), focusing on their problematic nature, particularly in the context of women’s desistance. The rhetoric of the TR agenda to include PbR is unhelpful to women attempting desistance. Desistance requires maintenance and may include deviations. When employing binary measures of reoffending, failure to comply will inevitably result in restigmatisation. Additionally PbR threatens to draw funding away from the smaller female proportion of the CJS in favour of concentration on male outcomes which are often more likely to produce positive quantitatively positive results. This chapter challenges the equating of desistance with conformity to socially constructed ideals of what it is to be a ‘pro social’ woman. Social justice in the form of community movements are considered as alternatives to the punitive CJS. This chapter links the narratives of resilience and survival presented by staff members and connects them with the desistance narratives of women attempting to travel desistance journeys.
KeywordsCriminal justice system Social justice Transforming rehabilitation Payment by results Shared narratives
- Annison, J., & Brayford, J. (2015). Context; Transforming Rehabilitation: Implications for Women. In J. Annison, J. Brayford, & J. Deering (Eds.), Women and Criminal Justice: From the Corston Report to Transforming Rehabilitation. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
- Balfour, G., Hannah-Moffat, K., & Turnbull, S. (2018). Planning for Precarity? Experiencing the Carceral Continuum of Imprisonment and Reentry. In A. Sarat (Ed.), After Imprisonment Studies in Law, Politics and Society (Vol. 77, pp. 31–48). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
- Broad, R., & Spencer, J. (2015). Understanding the Marketisation of the Probation Service Through an Interpretative Policy Framework. In M. Wasik & S. Santatzoglou (Eds.), The Management of Change in Criminal Justice: Who Knows Best? Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Carlen, P. (1990). Alternatives to Women’s Imprisonment. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Clarke, B., & Chadwick, K. (2018). From ‘Troubled’ Women to Failing Institutions: Necessary Narrative Shifts in Decarceration of Women Post-Corston. In L. Moore, P. Scraton, & A. Wahidin (Eds.), Women’s Imprisonment and the Case for Abolition: Critical Reflections on Corston Ten Years On. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Clinks. (2013). Introducing Desistance: A Guide for Voluntary, Community and Social Enterprise Sector Organisations. London: Do It Justice.Google Scholar
- Corston, J. (2007). The Corston Report: A Report by Baroness Jean Corston of a Review of Women with Particular Vulnerabilities in the Criminal Justice System. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
- Cullen, J. T., Jonson, C. L., & Nagin, D. S. (2011). Prisons Do Not Reduce Recidivism. The Prison Journal, 48, 485–655.Google Scholar
- Davies, P. (2011). Gender, Crime and Victimisation. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Drake, D., & Scott, D. (2017). Build Communities Not Prisons [Blog]. Centre for Crime and Justice Studies. Available at: https://www.crimeandjustice.org.uk/resources/build-communities-not-prisons-0. Accessed 27 Dec 2018.
- Drake, D., Havard, C., & Muncie, J. (2018). The Dubious ‘Science’ of Risk Prediction in Criminal Justice. [Blog] Centre for Crime and Justice Studies. Available at: https://www.crimeandjustice.org.uk/resources/dubious-science-risk-prediction-criminal-justice. Accessed 27 Dec 2018.
- Farrall, S. (2002). Rethinking What Works with Offenders. Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
- GOV.UK. (2018). HM Prison Service. [online] Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/hm-prison-service. Accessed 27 Dec 2018.
- Graham, H., & McNeill, F. (2018). Desistance: Envisioning Futures. In P. Carlen & L. Ayres França (Eds.), Alternative Criminologies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Healy, D. (2012). The Dynamics of Desistance (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Hogarth, L. (2017). Trapped in the Justice Loop? Past, Present and Future of the Woman-Centred Services at the Heart of the Systems-Change Called for in the Corston Report (Briefing 18). London: Centre for Crime and Justice Studies.Google Scholar
- House of Commons Justice Committee. (2013). Women Offenders After the Corston Report: Second Report of Session 2013–2014. London: The Stationery Office Limited.Google Scholar
- Inquest.org.uk. (2018). Deaths of Women in Prison|INQUEST. [online] Available at: http://inquest.org.uk/statistics/deaths-of-women-in-prison. Accessed 27 Dec 2018.
- Jamieson, J., McIvor, G., & Murray, C. (1999). Understanding Offending Amongst Young People. Edinburgh: The Scottish Executive.Google Scholar
- Kennedy, H. (1993). Eve Was Framed: Women and British Justice. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
- Laub, J., & Sampson, R. (2003). Shared Beginnings, Divergent Lives. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- McDermott, S. (2012). Moving Forward: Empowering Women to Desist from Offending. London: The Griffins Society.Google Scholar
- Ministry of Justice. (2012). Swift and Sure Justice: The Governments Plans for Reform of the CJS (CM 8388). London: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
- Moore, L., & Wahadin, A. (2018). The Post-Corston Women’s Penal ‘Crisis’ in England and Wales: Exploring the Failure of Reform. In L. Moore, P. Scraton, & A. Wahidin (Eds.), Women’s Imprisonment and the Case for Abolition: Critical Reflections on Corston Ten Years On. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Moore, L., Scraton, P., & Wahidin, A. (Eds.). (2018). Women’s Imprisonment and the Case for Abolition: Critical Reflections on Corston Ten Years On. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Österman, L. (2018). Penal Cultures and Female Desistance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Prison Reform Trust. (2014). Transforming Lives: Reducing Women’s Imprisonment. Stockport: Soroptimist International.Google Scholar
- Prison Reform Trust. (2018). Broken Trust: The Rising Numbers of Women Recalled to Prison. London: Prison Reform Trust.Google Scholar
- Radcliffe, P., & Hunter, G. (2013). The Development and Impact of Community Services for Women Offenders: An Evaluation. London: The Institute for Criminal Policy Research, School of Law, Birkbeck College.Google Scholar
- Scott, D., & Codd, H. (2010). Controversial Issues in Prisons. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Sim, J. (2018). We Are All (Neo-)Liberals Now: Reform and the Prison Crisis in England and Wales Justice. Power and Resistance, 1, 165–188.Google Scholar
- Smart, C. (1977). Women, Crime and Criminology: A Feminist Critique. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- The Howard League. (2016). Is This the End of Women’s Centres? London: All Party Parliamentary Group for Women.Google Scholar
- The Offender Rehabilitation Act. (2014). Available at: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/11/contents/enacted. Last Accessed 12 Mar 2019.
- Women in Prison. (2017). Key Facts. Available at: http://www.womeninprison.org.uk/research/key-facts.php. Accessed 25 Sept 2017.
- Young, J. (1991). Left Realism and the Priorities of Crime Control. In K. Stenson & D. Cowell (Eds.), The Politics of Crime Control. London: Sage.Google Scholar