Advertisement

Explaining Desistance: Traditional Perspectives

  • Úna BarrEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Critical Criminological Perspectives book series (CCRP)

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of what is currently ‘known’ about desistance theory. It critically explores the three main desistance theories—maturational (ontogenetic), social bonds (sociological) and narrative (subjective) theories—and examines the link between the development of the study of desistance and difference, to include what is currently ‘known’ about female desistance journeys. The chapter concludes that women’s desistance narratives are not well explored in the literature, but that considering desistance from a female and feminist perspective can shed light on the structural inequalities, caused by both patriarchal social structures and neoliberalism, faced by those attempting to (re)build their lives following contact with the Criminal Justice System.

Keywords

Maturational theory Social bonds theory Narrative theory Gender Feminism 

Bibliography

  1. Aresti, A., Eatough, V., & Brooks-Gordan, B. (2010). Doing Time After Time: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of Reformed Ex-Prisoners’ Experiences of Self-change, Identity and Career Opportunities. Psychology Crime and Law, 16(3), 169–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asquith, S., & Samuel, E. (1994). Criminal Justice and Related Services for Young Adult Offenders: A Review. Edinburgh: HMSO.Google Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1989). Human Agency in Social Cognitive Theory. American Psychologist, 44, 1175–1184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barr, U. (2018). Gendered Assisted Desistance: A Decade from Corston. Safer Communities, 17(2), 81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barry, M. (2006). Youth Offending in Transition: The Search for Social Recognition. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bersani, B. E., Laub, J. H., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2009). Marriage and Desistance from Crime in the Netherlands: Do Gender and Socio-Historical Context Matter? Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25, 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bottoms, A., & Shapland, J. (2010). Steps Towards Desistance Among Young Adult Recidivists. In S. Farrall, R. Sparks, S. Maruna, & M. Hough (Eds.), Escape Routes. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Bottoms, A., & Shapland, J. (2011). Steps Toward Desistance Among Male Young Adult Recidivists. In S. Farrall, M. Hough, S. Maruna, & R. Sparks (Eds.), Escape Routes: Contemporary Perspectives on Life After Punishment. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Bottoms, A., Shapland, J., Costello, A., Holmes, D., & Muir, G. (2004). Towards Desistance: Theoretical Underpinnings for an Empirical Study. The Howard Journal, 43(4), 368–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, Shame and Reintegration. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burnett, R. (1992). The Dynamics of Recidivism. Oxford: Centre for Criminological Research, University of Oxford, Research Report for the Home Office.Google Scholar
  12. Burnett, R., & Maruna, S. (2004). So Prison Works, Does It? The Criminal Careers of 130 Men Released from Prison under Home Secretary, Michael Howard. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 43, 390–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bushway, S. D., Piquero, A. R., Broidy, L. M., Cauffman, E. E., & Mazerolle, P. (2001). An Empirical Framework for Studying Desistance as a Process. Criminology, 39(2), 491–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Calverley, A. (2013). Cultures of Desistance: Rehabilitation, Reintegration and Ethnic Minorities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Carlsson, C. (2011). Using “Turning Points” to Understand Processes of Change in Offending. British Journal of Criminology, 52, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carlsson, C. (2012). Processes of Intermittency in Criminal Careers: Notes from a Swedish Study on Life Courses and Crime. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 57(8), 913–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carr, N. T., & Stovall Hanks, R. (2012). If “60 Is the New 40,” Is 35 the New 15? Late Onset Crime and Delinquency. Deviant Behaviour, 33, 393–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Codd, H. (2013). In the Shadow of Prison: Families, Imprisonment and Criminal Justice. Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
  19. Farrall, S. (2002). Rethinking What Works with Offenders. Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
  20. Farrall, S., & Calverley, A. (2006). Understanding Desistance from Crime (Crime and Justice Series). London: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Farrington, D. P., & West, D. J. (1995). Effects of Marriage, Separation, and Children on Offending by Adult Males. In Z. Blau Smith & J. Hagan (Eds.), Current Perspectives on Aging and the Life Cycle (4th ed.). Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  22. Gartner, R., & Piliavin, I. (1988). The Aging Offender and the Aged Offender. In P. B. Baltes, D. L. Featherman, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Life-Span Development and Behaviour (9th ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  23. Gilligan. (1982). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Giordano, P. C., Cernokovich, S. A., & Rudolph, J. L. (2002). Gender, Crime and Desistance: Toward a Theory of Cognitive Transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 990–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Glueck, S., & Glueck, E. (1950). Unravelling Juvenile Delinquency. New York: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Gomm, R. (2016). Women Making Meaning of Their Desistance from Offending: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Doctoral Thesis, Durham University, Durham.Google Scholar
  27. Gottfredson, M., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A General Theory of Crime. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Gove, W. (1985). The Effect of Age and Gender on Deviant Behaviour: A Biopsychosocial Perspective. In A. Rossi (Ed.), Gender and the Life Course. New York: Aldine.Google Scholar
  29. Graham, J., & Bowling, B. (1995). Young People and Crime (Research Study No. 145). London: HMRSO.Google Scholar
  30. Hart, E. L. (2017). Prisoners Post-Release, The Need for a Critical Desistance. In E. L. Hart & F. J. C. Van Ginneken (Eds.), New Perspectives on Desistance. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Healy, D. (2012). The Dynamics of Desistance (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Healy, D., & O’Donnell, I. (2006). Criminal Thinking on Probation: A Perspective from Ireland. Criminal Justice and Behaviour, 33, 782–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hillyard, P., Pantazis, C., Tombs, S., & Gordon, D. (2004). Beyond Criminology: Taking Harm Seriously. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  34. HMIP. (2016). Desistance and Young People. Manchester: Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Probation.Google Scholar
  35. Horney, J., Osgood, D. W., & Marshall, I. H. (1995). Criminal Careers in the Short Term: Intra Individual Variability in Crime and its Relation to Local Life Circumstances. American Sociological Review, 60(5), 655–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jamieson, J., McIvor, G., & Murray, C. (1999). Understanding Offending Amongst Young People. Edinburgh: The Scottish Executive.Google Scholar
  37. Katz, R. (2000). Explaining Girl’s and Women’s Crime and Desistance in the Context of their Victimization Experiences. Violence Against Women, 6, 633–660.Google Scholar
  38. King, R. D., Massoglia, M., & Macmillan, R. (2007). The Context of Marriage and Crime: Gender, the Propensity to Marry, and Offending in Early Adulthood. Criminology, 45(1), 33–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Knight, B. J., Osborn, S. G., & West, D. J. (1977). Early Marriage and Criminal Tendency in Males British Journal of Criminology. British Journal of Criminology, 17, 348–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Laub, J., & Sampson, R. (2003). Shared Beginnings, Divergent Lives. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Laub, J. H., Nagin, D. S., & Sampson, R. J. (1998). Trajectories of Change in Criminal Offending: Good Marriages and the Desistance Process. American Sociological Review, 63, 225–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. LeBel, T. P., Burnett, R., Maruna, S., & Bushway, S. (2008). The “Chicken and Egg” of Subjective and Social Factors in Desistance from Crime. European Journal of Criminology, 5(11), 131–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Leibrich, J. (1993). Straight to the Point: Angles on Giving Up Crime. Otago: University of Otago Press.Google Scholar
  44. Leverentz, A. (2006). The Love of a Good Man? Romantic Relationships as a Source of Support or Hindrance for Female Ex-Offenders. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 43(4), 459–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Leverentz, A. (2014). The Ex-Prisoner’s Dilemma: How Women Negotiate Competing Narratives of Re-entry and Desistance. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Maruna, S. (1999). Desistance and Development: The Psychosocial Process of “Going Straight”. The British Criminology Conferences: Selected Proceedings, 2, 1–19.Google Scholar
  47. Maruna, S. (2001). Making Good – How Ex-Convicts Reform and Rebuild Their Lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Maruna, S., & Farrall, S. (2004). Desistance from Crime: A Theoretical Reformulation. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 43, 171–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Maruna, S., LeBel, T. P., Mitchell, N., & Naples, M. (2004). Pygmalion in the Reintegration Process: Desistance from Crime through the Looking Glass. Psychology Crime and Law, 10(3), 271–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Matsueda, R. L., & Heimer, K. (1997). ‘A Symbolic Interactionist Theory of Role Transitions’, Role Commitments. In T. P. Thonberry (Ed.), Advances in Criminological Theory, Vol. 7, Developmental Theories of Crime and Delinquency. New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
  51. Matthews, R., Easton, H., Reynolds, L., Bindel, J., & Young, L. (2014). Exiting Prostitution. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McIvor, G., Murray, C., & Jamieson, J. (2011). Desistance from Crime: Is It Different for Women and Girls? In S. Maruna & R. Immarigeon (Eds.), After Crime and Punishment: Pathways to Offender Reintegration. Willan: Cullompton.Google Scholar
  53. McNeill, F. (2003). Desistance-Focused Probation Practice. In W.-H. Chui & M. Nellis (Eds.), Moving Probation Forward: Evidence, Arguments and Practice (pp. 146–162). Harlow: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
  54. Ministry of Justice. (2013). Analysis of the Impact of Employment on Re-offending following Release from Custody, Using Propensity Score Matching. London: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
  55. Moffitt, T. (1993). Adolescent-Limited and Life-Course-Persistent Antisocial Behaviour: A Developmental Taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Österman, L. (2018). Penal Cultures and Female Desistance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  57. Rex, S. (1999). Desistance from Offending: Experiences of Probation. The Howard Journal, 38(4), 366–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rodermond, E., Kruttschnitt, C., Slotboom, A. M., & Bijieveld, C. C. J. H. (2016). Female Desistance: A Review of the Literature. European Journal of Criminology, 13(1), 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rumgay, J. (2004). Scripts for Safer Survival: Pathways Out of Female Crime. The Howard Journal, 43(4), 405–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rutter, M., Giller, H., & Hagell, A. (1998). Antisocial Behaviour by Young People. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1992). Crime and Deviance in the Life Course. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 63–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1993). Crime in the Making: Pathways and Turning Points Through Life. London: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (2005). A Life-Course View of the Development of Crime. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 602, 12–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sampson, R. J., Laub, J. H., & Wimer, C. (2006). Does Marriage Reduce Crime? A Counterfactual Approach to Within-Individual Causal Effects. Criminology, 44(3), 465–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sapouna, M., Bisset, C., & Conlong, A. (2011). What Works to Reduce Reoffending: A Summary of the Evidence. Justice Analytical Services. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.Google Scholar
  66. Shover, N. (1996). Great Pretenders: Pursuits and Careers of Persistent Thieves. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
  67. Sommers, I., & Baskin, D. R. (1994). Factors Related to Female Adolescent Initiation into Violent Street Crime. Youth Society, 25, 468–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Steffensmeier, D., Zhong, H., & Liu, Y. (2017). Age and Its Relation to Crime in Taiwan and United States: Invariant, or Does Cultural Context Matter? Criminology, 55, 377–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Uggen, C. (2000). Work as a Turning Point in the Life Course of Criminals: A Duration Model of Age, Employment, and Recidivism. American Sociological Review, 67, 529–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Uggen, C., & Kruttschnitt, C. (1998). Crime in the Breaking: Gender Differences in Desistance. Law and Society Review, 32, 339–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Uggen, C., Manza, J., & Behrens, A. (2004). Less Than the Average Citizen: Stigma, Role Transition and the Civic Reintegration of Convicted Felons. In S. Maruna & R. Immarigeon (Eds.), After Crime and Punishment: Pathways to Offender Reintegration (pp. 261–294). Cullompton: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  72. Vaughan, B. (2007). The Internal Narrative of Desistance. The British Journal of Criminology, 47(3), 390–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Verbruggen, J., Blokland, A. A. J., & Van Der Geest, V. R. (2012). Effects of Employment and Unemployment on Serious Offending in a High-Risk Sample of Men and Women from Ages 18 to 32 in the Netherlands. British Journal of Criminology, 52(5), 845–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Warr, M. (1998). Life–Course Transitions and Desistance from Crime. Criminology, 36, 183–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Warr, M. (2002). Companions in Crime. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Weaver, B., & McNeill, F. (2010). Changing Lives? Desistance Research and Offender Management (3rd ed.). Glasgow: The Scottish Centre for Crime and Research.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Humanities and Social ScienceLiverpool John Moores UniversityLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations