Advertisement

Care, and Its Relevance to Today’s Economy

  • Ora Setter
  • László Zsolnai
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Sustainable Business In Association with Future Earth book series (PSSBAFE)

Abstract

Care is a central aspect of human existence. What we care about and who we care for largely determine our way of being. The subjects of care present a frame of reference for our human functioning. Within organizational settings, caring is usually thought of as pertaining either to leadership roles or to team and peer social ties. But from the organizational or management point of view, there are more stakeholders to care about. The imperative of responsibility implies that nature, human beings, and future generations should be accepted as primary subjects of care in business. Business actors must develop practices that incorporate genuine interest in and caring for the existence and well-being of these primordial “stakeholders.” We care for others not because they have rights that we should respect, or because we expect something in return from them. We care for others because of our humanity. However, this does not mean that care is always disinterested. Caring for others in many cases serves our best interest. But the primary motive for caring is not self-interest, but our responsibility for the existence and well-being of others.

References

  1. Ainsworth, M. D., Blehar, M. D., Waters, E., & Wall, S. N. (2015). Patterns of Attachment: A Psychological Study of the Strange Situation. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and Loss. New York: Basic books.Google Scholar
  3. Bufalari, I., Aprile, T., Avenati, A., Di Russo, F., & Aglioti, S. M. (2007). Empathy for Pain and Touch in the Human Somatosensory Cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 17(11), 2553–2561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Darwin, C. (1871). The Decent of Man and Selection in Relation of Sex (Vol. 2). London: John Murrey Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jonas, H. (1984). The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar
  8. Loye, D. (2009). The Ghost at the Birthday Party. www.commondreams.org/view/2009/02/12-10.
  9. Mitroff, I. (1998). Smart Thinking for Crazy Times: The Art of Solving the Right Problems. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Mitroff, I., & Silvers, A. (2009). Dirty Rotten Strategies—How We Trick Ourselves and Others into Solving the Wrong Problems Precisely. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Orehek, E., & Inagati, T. (2017). On the Benefits of Giving Social Support: When, Why, and How Support Providers Gain by Caring for Others. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(2), 109–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Zsolnai, L. (2018). Ethics, Meaning, and Market Society. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ora Setter
    • 1
  • László Zsolnai
    • 2
  1. 1.Tel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
  2. 2.Corvinus University of BudapestBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations