Computing Consensus: A Logic for Reasoning About Deliberative Processes Based on Argumentation
Argumentation theory can encode an agent’s assessment of the state of an exchange of points of view. We present a conservative model of multiple agents potentially disagreeing on the views presented during a process of deliberation. We model this process as iteratively adding points of view (arguments), or aspects of points of view. This gives rise to a modal logic, deliberative dynamic logic, which permits us to reason about the possible developments of the deliberative state. The logic we propose applies to all natural semantics of argumentation theory. Furthermore, under a very weak assumption that the consensus considered by a group of agents is faithful to their individual views, we show that model checking these models is feasible, as long as the argumentation frameworks, which may be infinite, does not have infinite branching.
KeywordsArgumentation theory Multi agent systems Modal logic Dynamic logic Deliberation Consensus
- 5.Caminada, M., Pigozzi, G., Podlaszewski, M.: Manipulation in group argument evaluation. In: The 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, vol. 3, pp. 1127–1128. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (2011)Google Scholar
- 9.Grossi, D.: On the logic of argumentation theory. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, vol. 1, pp. 409–416. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (2010)Google Scholar
- 10.Rahwan, I., Simari, G.R.: Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 47. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar