Advertisement

Reduction of Variations Using Chemometric Model Transfer: A Case Study Using FT-NIR Miniaturized Sensors

  • Mohamed HossamEmail author
  • Amr WassalEmail author
  • M. Watheq El-KharashiEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 921)

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to study the unit-to-unit variations in miniaturized Fourier Transform Near-InfraRed (FT-NIR) spectral sensors and the effects of these variations on a classification model developed on a single reference calibration sensor. The paper introduces a simple technique to transfer a classification model from the reference calibration sensor to any other target sensor taking into account variations that might occur. The unit-to-unit variations of the sensors usually result from changes in the signal to noise ratio (SNR) of the sensor due to changes in the mode of operation, variations due to aging, variations due to production tolerances, or changes that occur due to the setup and usage scenario such as scanning through a different medium. To prove the effectiveness of the model transfer technique, we use a Gaussian process classification (GPC) model developed using spectral data from ultra-high temperature (UHT) pasteurized milk with different levels of fat content. The model aims to classify the milk samples based on their fat content. After the model is developed, three experiments are held to mimic each type of the variations and to test how far this will influence the GPC model accuracy after applying the transfer technique.

Keywords

FT-NIR Gaussian process classification Milk Model transfer Unit-to-unit variation 

Notes

Acknowledgment

We would like to express our appreciation to Si-Ware Systems for supporting this research with their state-of-the-art spectrometers and allowing us to use their facilities and laboratories.

References

  1. 1.
    Sabry, Y.M., Khalil, D.A.M., Medhat, M., Haddara, H., Saadany, B., Hassan, K.: Si Ware Systems. Integrated spectral unit. U.S. Patent Application 15/623,961 (2017)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anwar, M., Medhat, M., Mortada, B., El Shater, A.O., Seif, M.G., Nagy, M., Saadany, B.A., Hafez, A.N.: Si Ware Systems. Self calibration for mirror positioning in optical MEMS interferometers. U.S. Patent 9,658,107 (2017)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Griffiths, P.R., De Haseth, J.A.: Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometry, vol. 171. Wiley, Hoboken (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rinnan, Å., van den Berg, F., Engelsen, S.B.: Review of the most common pre-processing techniques for near-infrared spectra. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 28(10), 1201–1222 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pérez-Enciso, M., Tenenhaus, M.: Prediction of clinical outcome with microarray data: a partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) approach. Hum. Genet. 112(5–6), 581–592 (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ma, J., Pu, H., Sun, D.W., Gao, W., Qu, J.H., Ma, K.Y.: Application of Vis–NIR hyperspectral imaging in classification between fresh and frozen-thawed pork Longissimus Dorsi muscles. Int. J. Refrig. 50, 10–18 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eriksson, L.: Introduction to Multi- and Megavariate Data Analysis Using Projection Methods (PCA & PLS). Umetrics AB, Umeå (1999)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Næs, T., Isaksson, T., Fearn, T., Davies, T.: A User Friendly Guide to Multivariate Calibration and Classification. NIR publications, Chichester (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bernardo, J., Berger, J., Dawid, A., Smith, A.: Regression and classification using Gaussian process priors. Bayesian Stat. 6, 475 (1998)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Computer and Systems Engineering DepartmentAin Shams UniversityCairoEgypt
  2. 2.Computer Engineering DepartmentCairo UniversityCairoEgypt

Personalised recommendations