• Shelly GottfriedEmail author


A decade after the collapse of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., life expectancy for a man in Britain, the oldest liberal society in the world, has declined from an anticipated 83 years to 82, and for a woman from 90.1 years to 89. At the same time, life expectancy in the US, considered as the first representative democracy in history, is also falling. At the same time, the median hourly income is about the same as it was in 1971. While this book does not intend to deal directly with the causes of these gloomy facts, the story it tells about how the very wealthy few use authoritative power to manipulate the economy for their own good might give a clue about the declining quality of life for the rest.


  1. Albert, M. (1993). Capitalism Against Capitalism. London: Whurr.Google Scholar
  2. Alvaredo, F., Atkinson, A. B., Piketty, T., & Saez, E. (2013). The Top 1 Percent in International and Historical Perspective (National Bureau of Economic Research No. w19075).Google Scholar
  3. Atkinson, A. B., Piketty, T., & Saez, E. (2009). Top Incomes in the Long Run of History (National Bureau of Economic Research No. w15408).Google Scholar
  4. Block, F., & Somers, M. R. (2014). The Power of Market Fundamentalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
  5. Clark, B. R. (1977). Academic Power in Italy: Bureaucracy and Oligarchy in a National University System. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Coates, D. (2000). Models of Capitalism: Growth and Stagnation in the Modern Era. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  7. Davies, W. (2017). Elite Power Under Advanced Neoliberalism. Theory, Culture & Society, 34(5–6), 227–250.Google Scholar
  8. Davis, A., & Williams, K. (2017). Introduction: Elites and Power After Financialization. Theory, Culture & Society, 34(5–6), 3–26.Google Scholar
  9. Domhoff, G. W. (1990). The Power Elite and the State. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  10. Engvall, J. (2015). The State as Investment Market: A Framework for Interpreting the Post-Soviet State in Eurasia. Governance, 28(1), 25–40.Google Scholar
  11. Fogel, K. (2006). Oligarchic Family Control, Social Economic Outcomes, and the Quality of Government. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(5), 603–622.Google Scholar
  12. Freeland, C. (2012). Plutocrats—The Rise of the New Global Super-Rich and the Fall of Everyone Else. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  13. Gilens, M., & Page, B. (2014). Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens. Perspectives on Politics, 2(3), 564–581.Google Scholar
  14. Granovetter, M. (2010). Business Groups and Social Organization. In N. J. Smelser & R. Swedberg (Eds.), The Handbook of Economic Sociology—Second Edition (pp. 429–450). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hacker, J. S., & Pierson, P. (2010). Winner-Take-All Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer-and Turned Its Back on the Middle Class. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  16. Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (Eds.). (2001). Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  17. Hellman, J. S., Jones, G., & Kaufmann, D. (2000). Seize the State, Seize the Day: State Capture, Corruption, and Influence in Transition. The Word Bank (Policy Research Working Paper No. 2444).Google Scholar
  18. Hilferding, R. (1980 [1910]) Finance Capital (3rd ed.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  19. Howell, C. (2003). Varieties of Capitalism: And Then There Was One? Comparative Politics, 36(1), 103–124.Google Scholar
  20. Johnson, S. (2009). The Quiet Coup. The Atlantic, p. 52. Available: Accessed 24 January 2012.
  21. Kapferer, B. (2005). New Formations of Power, the Oligarchic-Corporate State, and Anthropological Ideological Discourse. Anthropological Theory, 5(3), 285–299.Google Scholar
  22. Khanna, T., & Rivkin, J. W. (2001). Estimating the Performance Effects of Business Groups in Emerging Markets. Strategic Management Journal, 22(1), 45–74.Google Scholar
  23. Khanna, T., & Yafeh, Y. (2007). Business Groups in Emerging Markets: Paragons or Parasites? Journal of Economic Literature, 45(2), 331–337.Google Scholar
  24. Krugman, P. (2007). The Conscience of a Liberal. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  25. Krugman, P. (2011, November 4). Oligarchy, American Style. The New York Times. Available: Accessed 3 November 2012.
  26. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate Ownership around the World. Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471–517.Google Scholar
  27. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (2000). Investor Protection and Corporate Governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1), 3–27.Google Scholar
  28. Leach, D. K. (2005). The Iron Law of What Again? Conceptualizing Oligarchy Across Organizational Forms. Sociological Theory, 23(3), 312–337.Google Scholar
  29. Lenin, V. I. (1999 [1916]). Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism (3rd ed.). Australia: Resistance Books.Google Scholar
  30. Lessig, L. (2011). Republic, Lost: How Money Corrupts Congress—And a Plan to Stop It. New York: Twelve.Google Scholar
  31. Maman, D., & Rosenhek, Z. (2012). The Institutional Dynamics of a Developmental State: Change and Continuity in State-Economy Relations in Israel. Studies in Comparative International Development, 47, 342–363.Google Scholar
  32. Mangel, R., & Singh, H. (1993). Ownership Structure, Board Relationships and CEO Compensation in Large US Corporations. Accounting and Business Research, 23(1), 339–350.Google Scholar
  33. Mansfield, H. C., Jr. (1983). On the Impersonality of the Modern State: A Comment on Machiavelli’s Use of Stato. The American Political Science Review, 77(4), 849–857.Google Scholar
  34. Maron, A., & Shalev, M. (Eds.). (2017). Neoliberalism as a State Project: Changing the Political Economy of Israel. US: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Marx, K. (1977 [1867]). Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Volume I. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  36. McCormick, J. P. (1993). Addressing the Political Exception: Machiavelli’s ‘Accidents’ and the Mixed Regime. American Political Science Review, 87(4), 888–900.Google Scholar
  37. Michels, R. (1915). Political Parties—A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracies. New York: Hearst’s International Library Co.Google Scholar
  38. Mintz, B., & Schwartz, M. (1985). The Power Structure of American Business. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  39. Morck, R., Wolfenzon, D., & Yeung, B. (2005). Corporate Governance, Economic Entrenchment, and Growth. Journal of Economic Literature, 43(3), 655–720.Google Scholar
  40. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Palmer, D. A., Jennings, P. D., & Zhou, X. (1993). Late Adoption of the Multidivisional Form by Large U.S. Corporations: Institutional, Political and Economic Accounts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(1), 100–131.Google Scholar
  42. Peled, Y., & Navot, D. (2005). Ethnic Democracy Revisited: On the State of Democracy in the Jewish State. Israel Studies Review, 20(1), 3–27.Google Scholar
  43. Perry, J., & Wise, L. R. (1990). The Motivational Bases of Public Service. Public Administration Review, 50(3), 367–373.Google Scholar
  44. Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Piketty, T., & Saez, E. (2003). Income Inequality in the United States, 1913–1998. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 1–41.Google Scholar
  46. Piketty, T., & Saez, E. (2006). The Evolution of Top Incomes: A Historical and International Perspective (National Bureau of Economic Research, No. w11955).Google Scholar
  47. Poggi, G. (1990). The State: Its Nature, Development, and Prospects. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Reich, R. B. (2007). Supercapitalism: The Battle for Democracy in an Age of Big Business. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. Google Scholar
  49. Rodrik, D. (2018). Straight Talk on Trade: Ideas for a Sane World Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Sager, F., & Rosser, C. (2009). Weber, Wilson, and Hegel: Theories of Modern Bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 69(6), 1136–1147.Google Scholar
  51. Samons, L. J. (1998). Mass, Elite, and Hoplite-Farmer in Greek History. A Journal of Humanities and the Classics, 5(3), 99–123.Google Scholar
  52. Schmidt, A. J. (1973). Oligarchy in Fraternal Organizations: A Study in Organizational Leadership. Detroit, MI: Gale Research Company.Google Scholar
  53. Simonton, M. (2017). Classical Greek Oligarchy: A Political History. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Smooha, S. (1990). Minority Status in an Ethnic Democracy: The Status of the Arab Minority in Israel. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 13(3), 389–413.Google Scholar
  55. Stiglitz, J. (2018). Globalization and Its Discontents Revisited: Anti-Globalization in the Era of Trump. New York: Norton and Company.Google Scholar
  56. Varoufakis, Y. (2017). Talking to My Daughter About the Economy: A Brief History of Capitalism. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  57. Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press. Google Scholar
  58. Winters, J. A. (2011). Oligarchy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Yiftachel, O. (1999). ‘Ethnocracy’: The Politics of Judaizing Israel/Palestine. Constellations, 6(3), 364–390.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.City Political Economy Research Centre (CITYPERC)City, University of LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Beit Berl CollegeBeit BerlIsrael

Personalised recommendations