Advertisement

Multi-Agent Based Water Distribution and Underground Pipe Health Monitoring System Using IoT

  • Lakshmi Kanthan Narayanan
  • Suresh SankaranarayananEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 800)

Abstract

Water has become an essential resource to be preserved globally. The need for monitoring the distribution of water with good quality and also meeting the consumer demand is highly essential. This is highly possible by means of Internet of Things (IoT) with edge/fog computing and cloud. Now there is need for intelligence in IoT for monitoring the health of the pipe periodically for proper water distribution thereby meeting the consumer demand. These needs to be automated with minimal human intervention So accordingly, we here propose an multiagent based Smart Water Distribution System employing IoT technologies integrated with Fog for underground pipe health monitoring system. The agent at the aggregator would monitor the underground pipeline health and report to the nodal agent at the Edge. The nodal agent at the edge/fog performs the analytics of the pipe health based on the real-time values and also it predicts the future impact on the health of the pipe using rule-based system on the basis of fluid mechanics. In addition, the agents in cloud is responsible for demand forecasting and pricing calculation for the water consumed. The inter communication between the agents, consumers and SCADA engineers will happen through inter-agent communication mechanism.

Keywords

IoT SWDS Multi-agents SCADA Inter-agent communication 

References

  1. 1.
    Jawhar, I., Mohamed, N., Shuaib, K.: A framework for pipeline infrastructure monitoring using wireless sensor networks. In: Wireless Telecommunications Symposium, 2007. WTS 2007, pp. 1–7 (April 2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mohamed, N., Jawhar, I.: A fault tolerant wired/wireless sensor network architecture for monitoring pipeline infrastructures. In: SENSORCOMM’08: Proceedings of the 2008 Second International Conference on Sensor Technologies and Applications, pp. 179–184. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mohamed, N., Jawhar, I., Shuaib, K.: Reliability challenges and enhancement approaches for pipeline sensor and actor networks. In: ICWN, pp. 46–51 (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Murphy, F., Laffey, D., O’Flynn, B., Buckley, J., Barton, J.: Development of a wireless sensor network for collaborative agents to treat scale formation in oil pipes. In: EWSN, pp. 179–194 (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jin, Y., Eydgahi, A.: Monitoring of distributed pipeline systems by wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of The 2008 IJAC-IJME International Conference, Nashville, TN (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kim, J., Lim, J.S., Friedman, J., Lee, U., Vieira, L., Rosso, D., Gerla, M., Srivastava, M.B.: Sewersnort: a drifting sensor for in-situ sewer gas monitoring. In: Sixth Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (SECON 2009) (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stoianov, I., Nachman, L., Madden, S., Tokmouline, T.: PIPENET: a wireless sensor network for pipeline monitoring. In: IPSN ’07: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, pp. 264–273. ACM, New York, NY (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nassiraei, A., Kawamura, Y., Ahrary, A., Mikuriya, Y., Ishii, K.: Concept and design of a fully autonomous sewer pipe inspection mobile robot “KANTARO”. In Robotics and Automation, 2007 IEEE International Conference on, pp. 136–143 (April 2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Scholl, K.-U., Kepplin, V., Berns, K., Dillmann, R.: Controlling a multi-joint robot for autonomous sewer inspection. In: Robotics and Automation, 2000. Proceedings. ICRA ’00. IEEE International Conference on, vol. 2, pp. 1701–1706 (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Franklin, S., Graesser, A.: Is it an agent, or just a program?: a taxonomy for autonomous agents. In: Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Agents, Theories, Architectures, and Languages, pp. 21–35 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jennings, N., Bussmann, S.: Agent-based control systems: why are they suited to engineering complex systems? IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 23(3), 61–73 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Davis, W.: The distributed intelligent control of complex systems. In: Intelligent Processing and Manufacturing of Materials, 1999. IPMM ’99. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on, vol. 1, pp. 615–621 (July 1999)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vale, Z., Morais, H., Silva, M., Ramos, C.: Towards a future SCADA. In: Power Energy Society General Meeting, 2009. PES ’09. IEEE, pp. 1–7 (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rudowsky, I.: Intelligent agents. In: Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems, Communications of the Association for Information System, vol. 14, pp. 275–290 (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Milojicic, D.: Mobile agent applications. IEEE Concurr. 7, 80–90 (September 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jennings, N.R., Wooldridge, M.: Applications of Intelligent Agents, pp. 3–28. Springer Nature, Berlin, Heidelberg (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Carrera, A., Iglesias, C.A.: A systematic review of argumentation techniques for multi-agent systems research. Artif. Intell. Rev., Springer. 44, 509–535 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lakshmi Kanthan Narayanan
    • 1
  • Suresh Sankaranarayanan
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringSRM Institute of Science and TechnologyChennaiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Information TechnologySRM Institute of Science and TechnologyChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations