Advertisement

Physics and Technical Principles of Three-Dimensional Echocardiography

  • Denisa Muraru
  • Luigi P. BadanoEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The backbone of the three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) technology is the transducer. Understanding the physics of 3DE and the way the matrix transducer works is pivotal for successful acquisition of good quality 3DE data sets. Different 3DE acquisition modalities are available (real-time/live, multi-beat, zoom, full-volume, color) to adapt to the different clinical needs. Once acquired, 3DE data sets should be postprocessed by cropping, rotating and slicing them in order to obtain the images that are needed to meet the clinical or research needs. Different ways of displaying the data sets are also available: volume rendering (to show anatomy), wireframe or solid surface rendering (for quantitative analysis) and multislice (for analysis of regional function and anatomy and 2D quantitative analysis). Moreover, new display modalities (such as stereoscopic vision, 3D printing and holography) are entering the clinical arena to provide an actual 3D appreciation and manipulation of images.

Keywords

Three-dimensional echocardiography Physics Probe Transducer Spatial resolution Temporal resolution Parallel beamforming Multibeat acquisition Data set acquisition Real-time Full-volume Cropping Rotating Slicing Volume rendering Surface rendering Multislice Stereoscopic vision 3D printing Holography 

Supplementary material

Video 2.1a

Biplane acquisition. Simultaneous acquisition of parasternal long-axis and short-axis view at the level of the aortic valve. The reference plane is the yellow one (parasternal long-axis) and the position of the orthogonal plane (white plane) can be adjusted using the track ball (AVI 33660 kb)

Video 2.1b

Triplane acquisition. Simultaneous acquisition of three apical views: four chamber (yellow plane, the reference plane), two-chamber (white plane) and long-axis (green plane). By default the three apical views are acquired at 0°, 60° and 120°, respectively. The angle of rotation can be adjusted by the operator during acquisition (AVI 19248 kb)

Video 2.3

Final volume-rendering display of the mitral valve from the atrial perspective. Mitral valve atrial perspective (right panel) after having cropped and rotated the data set. Left panels show the reference plane (left upper plane) and the elevation plane (left lower plane) with the position of the cropping plane (broken orange line) and the point of view (yellow arrow) (AVI 5947 kb)

Video 2.4a

LV full volume. Full volume display of a 3DE data set of the left ventricle (AVI 18681 kb)

Video 2.4b

5 slices. Five-slice display of a 3DE data set of the left ventricle. The reference plane (left upper quadrant) and the elevation plane (left lower panel) are shown along to three transversal cut planes: apical (right upper panel) taken at the level of the white broken line shown at the apex of the left ventricle in the longitudinal planePlanelongitudinals, and the basal (right lower panel) taken at the level of the white broken line shown at the apex of the left ventricle in the longitudinal planePlanelongitudinals. The intermediate transversal cut plane is equidistant from the apical and the basal one (AVI 20295 kb)

Video 2.4c

7 slice. Seven sliceData processingslicing display a 3DE data set of the left ventricle. The three longitudinal views are positioned (by default) a 60° (two-chamber view, right upper panel) and 120° (longitudinal view, left lower panel) from the reference view (four-chamber view, left upper panel). The position of the apical and basal transversal panes is shown by the corresponding white broken lines depicted on the longitudinal views. The two intermediate transversal cut planes are equidistant from the basal and apical views (AVI 27051 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Badano L. The clinical benefits of adding a third dimension to assess the left ventricle with echocardiography. Scientifica (Cairo). 2014;2014:897431, for figs 2, 4, 6, 7.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lang RM, Badano LP, Tsang W, et al. EAE/ASE recommendations for image acquisition and display using three-dimensional echocardiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;13:1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Muraru D, Badano LP. Physical and technical aspects and overview of 3D-echocardiography. In: Casas Rojo E, Fernandez-Golfin C, Zamorano J, editors. Manual of 3D echocardiography. Cham: Springer; 2017. p. 1–44.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Settergren M, Back M, Shahgaldi K, Jacobsen P, Winter R. 3D TEE with stereovision for guidance of the transcatheter mitral valve repair. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5:1066–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vasilyev NV, Novotny PM, Martinez JF, et al. Stereoscopic vision display technology in real-time three-dimensional echocardiography-guided intracardiac beating-heart surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;135:1334–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Marro A, Bandukwala T, Mak W. Three-dimensional printing and medical imaging: a review of the methods and applications. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2016;45:2–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim MS, Hansgen AR, Wink O, Quaife RA, Carroll JD. Rapid prototyping: a new tool in understanding and treating structural heart disease. Circulation. 2008;117:2388–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chia HN, Wu BM. Recent advances in 3D printing of biomaterials. J Biol Eng. 2015;9:4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yun PY. The application of three-dimensional printing techniques in the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;41:169–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Malik HH, Darwood AR, Shaunak S, et al. Three-dimensional printing in surgery: a review of current surgical applications. J Surg Res. 2015;199:512–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    AlAli AB, Griffin MF, Butler PE. Three-dimensional printing surgical applications. Eplasty. 2015;15:e37.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hsieh FY, Lin HH, Hsu SH. 3D bioprinting of neural stem cell-laden thermoresponsive biodegradable polyurethane hydrogel and potential in central nervous system repair. Biomaterials. 2015;71:48–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Collins SF. Bioprinting is changing regenerative medicine forever. Stem Cells Dev. 2014;23(Suppl 1):79–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Murphy SV, Atala A. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32:773–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liew Y, Beveridge E, Demetriades AK, Hughes MA. 3D printing of patient-specific anatomy: a tool to improve patient consent and enhance imaging interpretation by trainees. Br J Neurosurg. 2015;29:712–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mahmoud A, Bennett M. Introducing 3-dimensional printing of a human anatomic pathology specimen: potential benefits for undergraduate and postgraduate education and anatomic pathology practice. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2015;139:1048–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bernhard JC, Isotani S, Matsugasumi T, et al. Personalized 3D printed model of kidney and tumor anatomy: a useful tool for patient education. World J Urol. 2016;34:337–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Farooqi KM, Saeed O, Zaidi A, et al. 3D printing to guide ventricular assist device placement in adults with congenital heart disease and heart failure. JACC Heart Fail. 2016;4:301–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dickinson KJ, Matsumoto J, Cassivi SD, et al. Individualizing management of complex esophageal pathology using three-dimensional printed models. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;100:692–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Costello JP, Olivieri LJ, Su L, et al. Incorporating three-dimensional printing into a simulation-based congenital heart disease and critical care training curriculum for resident physicians. Congenit Heart Dis. 2015;10:185–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Olivieri LJ, Krieger A, Loke YH, Nath DS, Kim PC, Sable CA. Three-dimensional printing of intracardiac defects from three-dimensional echocardiographic images: feasibility and relative accuracy. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28:392–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mahmood F, Owais K, Taylor C, et al. Three-dimensional printing of mitral valve using echocardiographic data. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:227–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Vukicevic M, Puperi DS, Jane Grande-Allen K, Little SH. 3D printed modeling of the mitral valve for catheter-based structural interventions. Ann Biomed Eng. 2017;45:508–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Little SH, Vukicevic M, Avenatti E, Ramchandani M, Barker CM. 3D printed modeling for patient-specific mitral valve intervention: repair with a clip and a plug. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9:973–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shiraishi I, Yamagishi M, Hamaoka K, Fukuzawa M, Yagihara T. Simulative operation on congenital heart disease using rubber-like urethane stereolithographic biomodels based on 3D datasets of multislice computed tomography. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010;37:302–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Muraru D, Veronesi F, Maddalozzo A, et al. 3D printing of normal and pathologic tricuspid valves from transthoracic 3D echocardiography data sets. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;18:802–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bruckheimer E, Rotschild C, Dagan T, et al. Computer-generated real-time digital holography: first time use in clinical medical imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;17:845–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hunziker PR, Smith S, Scherrer-Crosbie M, et al. Dynamic holographic imaging of the beating human heart. Circulation. 1999;99:1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Vannan MA, Cao QL, Pandian NG, Sugeng L, Schwartz SL, Dalton MN. Volumetric multiplexed transmission holography of the heart with echocardiographic data. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1995;8:567–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Skolnick AA. New holographic process provides noninvasive 3-D anatomic views. JAMA. 1994;271:5–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ko K, Webster J. Holographic imaging of human brain preparations—a step toward virtual medicine. Surg Neurol. 1995;44:428–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Erickson RR. Holographic medical imaging: the laser as a visual scalpel—issues and observations on 3-D display. IEEE J Quantum Electron. 1996;2:1–8.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Milano-Bicocca, and Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS, San Luca HospitalMilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations