Advertisement

Global Public Goods and Governance for Addressing Sustainability

  • Inge Kaul
Chapter

Abstract

Underprovision of global public goods (GPGs) such as climate change, mitigation, financial stability, global health or cyber security, today threatens development in the North and in the South and, thereby, also global—economic, social and environmental—sustainability. This chapter shows that myriad corrective actions by state and nonstate actors are underway. However, the sum of those actions often does not add up to what is required to resolve global challenges. Provision gaps arise, persist and exacerbate, even in policy fields in which existential risks exist. While many factors come into play, including psychological, behavioral, organizational and macro-economic and geopolitical ones, an important one, which, moreover, could be corrected directly, is the current lack of a systematic theory and practice of global public policy. The chapter suggests an agenda for future research and debate aimed at constructing the building blocks of a new branch of public policy that offers well-founded advice on how to combine individual state and nonstate actor interests, including national sovereignty concerns, while meeting the adequate provision requirements of global public goods. New thinking along the lines could offer analytical lenses through which to look at current policymaking realities, better understand the impediments and facilitators of GPG provision and, perhaps, spark willingness among policymakers to choose new policy paths—realizing that those actually lead to enhanced interdependence management, development and global sustainability. By implication, a major responsibility for fostering governance for global sustainability rests with social-science scholars.

Keywords

Global public goods Financing international cooperation Policy innovation Sovereignty Global sustainability 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author thanks Ariane Götz, Machiko Nissanke and José Antonio Ocampo for their comments on an earlier version of this chapter and Kay Schröder for the design of the three figures.

References

  1. Atkinson, A. B. (Ed.). (2005). New sources of development finance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson, T. (2006). Global public finance. Oxonomics, 1(1), 2–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrett, S. (2007). Why cooperate? The incentive to supply global public goods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhattacharya, A., Meltzer, J. P., Oppenheim, J., Qureshi, Z., & Stern, N. (2016). Delivering on sustainable infrastructure for better development and better climate. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
  5. Biermann, F. (2014). Earth system governance; world politics in the anthropocene. Cambridge, MA/London: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Birdsall, N. (2018). On global public goods: It’s not big money but it’s big breakthrough. Available at: https://www.cgdev.org/blog/global-public-goods-not-big-money-but-breakthrough/
  7. Blended Finance Taskforce. (2018). Better finance better world. Consultation paper of the blended finance taskforce. London: Business & Sustainable Development Commission/SYSTEMIQ.Google Scholar
  8. Bodansky, D. (2012). What’s in a concept? Global public goods, international law, and legitimacy. European Journal of International Law, 23(3), 651–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bosselmann, K. (2017). The principle of sustainability: Transforming law and governance (2nd ed.). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Bostrom, N. (2013). Existential risk prevention as global priority. Global Policy, 1(4), 15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bremmer, I. (2012). Every nation for itself: Winners and losers in a g-zero world. London: Portfolio/Penguin.Google Scholar
  12. Brunnée, J., & Streck, C. (2013). The UNFCCC as a negotiating forum: Towards common but differentiated responsibilities. Climate Policy, 13(5), 589–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buchanan, J. M. (1965). An economic theory of clubs. Economica, 32(125), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Burck, J., Marten, F., Bals, C., & Höhne, N. (2018). Climate change performance index, Results 2018. Prepared by Climate Action Network (Beirut), German Watch (Berlin and Bonn) and New Climate Institute (Cologne and Berlin). Available at: https://www.climate-change-performance-index.org/sites/default/files/documents/the_climate_change_performance_index_2018_a4.pdf/
  15. Center for Global Development. (2016). Multilateral development banking for this century’s development challenges. Five recommendations to shareholders of the old and new Multilateral Development Banks. Report of the high level panel on the future of development banking. Washington, DC: Center for Global development.Google Scholar
  16. Coady, D., Parry, I., Sears, L., & Shang, B. (2017). How large are global fossil fuel subsidies? World Development, 91, 11–27.Google Scholar
  17. Conceição, P. (2003). Assessing the provision of global public goods. In I. Kaul, P. Conceição, K. Le Goulven, & R. U. Mendoza (Eds.), Providing global public goods: Managing globalization (pp. 152–184). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cooper, A. F., Heine, J., & Thakur, R. (Eds.). (2013). The oxford handbook of modern diplomacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Cornes, R., & Sandler, T. (1996). The theory of externalities, public goods and club goods (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Costanza, R., & Mageau, M. (1999). What is a healthy system? Aquatic Ecology, 33, 105–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Costanza, R., Cumberland, J. H., Daly, H., Goodland, R., Norgaard, R. B., Kubiszewski, I., & Franco, C. (2015). An introduction to ecological economics. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  22. Cramton, P., MacKay, D. J. C., Ochsenfels, A., & Stoft, S. (Eds.). (2017). Global carbon pricing. The path to climate cooperation. Cambridge, MA/London: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  23. Cullis, J., & Jones, P. (2009). Public finance and public choice: Analytical perspectives (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Desai, M. (2003). Public goods: A historical perspective. In I. Kaul, P. Conceição, K. Le Goulven, & R. U. Mendoza (Eds.), Providing global public goods: Managing globalization (pp. 63–77). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Development Initiatives. (2016). Blended finance: Understanding its potential for agenda 2030. Available at: http://devinit.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Blended-finance-Understanding-its-potential-for-Agenda-2030.pdf/
  26. Dubash, N. K., & Florini, A. (2011). Mapping global energy governance. Global Policy, 2(s1), 6–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Edenhofer, O., Jakob, M., Creutzig, F., Flachsland, C., Fuss, S., Kowarsch, M., Lessmann, K., Mattauch, L., Siegmeier, J., & Steckel, J. C. (2015). Closing the emission price gap. Global Environmental Change, 31(3), 132–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Føllesdal, A. (2014). Competing conceptions of subsidiarity. In J. E. Fleming & J. T. Levy (Eds.), Federalism and subsidiarity: Nomos LV (pp. 214–230). New York: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Frenk, J., & Moon, S. (2013). Governance challenges in global health. New England Journal of Medicine, 368, 936–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. GCF (Global Challenge Foundation). (2017). Global catastrophic risks 2017. Stockholm: GCF.Google Scholar
  31. Griffith-Jones, S., & Ocampo, J. A. (Eds.). (2018). The future of national development banks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Haas, R. (2017). World order 2.0: The case for sovereign obligation. Foreign Affairs, 96(1), 2–9.Google Scholar
  33. Hale, T., & Roger, C. (2014). Orchestration and transnational climate governance. Review of International Organizations, 9(1), 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hale, T., Held, D., & Young, K. (2013). Gridlock: Why global cooperation is failing when we need it most. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  35. Helgenberger, S., & Jänicke, M. (2017). Mobilizing the co-benefits of climate change mitigation: Connecting opportunities with interests in the new energy world of renewables (IASS working paper). Potsdam: Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies.Google Scholar
  36. High-Level Commission on Carbon Prices. (2017). Report of the high-level commission on carbon prices. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  37. Hirshleifer, J. (1983). From weakest-link to best-shot: The voluntary provision of public goods. Public Choice, 41(3), 371–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hume, D. [1739–1740] (2015). A treatise of human nature. Create Space Independent Publishing Platform.Google Scholar
  39. IEA (International Energy Agency). (2018). Global energy & CO2 status report. Paris: IEA/OECD.Google Scholar
  40. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). (2014). Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the IPCC. In O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, & Y. Sokona (Eds.), Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group iii to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jachtenfuchs, M., & Krisch, N. (2016). Subsidiarity in global governance. Law and Contemporary Problems, 79(2), 1–26.Google Scholar
  42. Kaul, I. (2013). Meeting global challenges: Assessing governance readiness. In Hertie School of Governance (Ed.), The governance report. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Kaul, I. (Ed.). (2016). Global public goods (The international library of critical writings in economics). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  44. Kaul, I. (2017). Providing global public goods: What role for multilateral development banks? London: Overseas Development Institute (ODI).Google Scholar
  45. Kaul, I. (2018a). Enhanced human security: A modernity to be available to all. In T. Meyer & S. de Marques (Eds.), Multiple modernities and good governance (pp. 83–97). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Kaul, I. (2018b). Implementing the 2030 agenda: What role for the group of twenty (G20)? Available at: http://www.g20.utoronto.ca/biblio/kaul-implementing-the-2030-agenda.pdf
  47. Kaul, I., & Blondin, D. (2016). Global public goods and the United Nations. In J. A. Ocampo (Ed.), Global governance and development (pp. 32–65). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kaul, I., & Conceição, P. (Eds.). (2006). The new public finance: Responding to global challenges. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Kaul, I., Grunberg, I., & Stern, M. A. (Eds.). (1999). Global public goods: International cooperation in the 21st century. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Kaul, I., Conceição, P., Le Goulven, K., & Mendoza, R. U. (Eds.). (2003). Providing global public goods: Managing globalization. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Kaul, I., Blondin, D., & Nahtigal, N. (2016). Understanding global public goods: Where we are and where to next. In I. Kaul (Ed.), Global public goods (The international library of critical writings in economics). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Keohane, R. O., & Victor, D. G. (2010). The regime complex for climate change (Discussion paper 10–33, Harvard project on climate agreements). Cambridge, MA: Belfer Center.Google Scholar
  53. Kharas, H., & Rogerson, A. (2017). Global development trends and challenges: Horizon 2025 revisited. ODI report. London: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
  54. Kickbusch, I., & Szabo, M. M. C. (2014). A new governance space for health. Global Health Action, 7. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3925805/.
  55. Kim, R. E., & Bosselmann, K. (2013). International environmental law in the anthropocene: Towards a purposive system of multilateral environmental agreements. Transnational Environmental Law, 2(2), 285–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Klenert, D., Mattauch, L., Combet, E., Edenhofer, O., Hepburn, C., Rafaty, R., & Stern, N. (2018). Making carbon pricing work for citizens. Nature Climate Change, 8, 669–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Leading Group on Innovative Financing for Development. (2010). Globalizing solidarity: The case for financial levies. Report of the committee of experts to the task force on international financial transactions and development. Paris: French Ministry of Foreign and European Affairs/Permanent Leading Group Secretariat. Available at: http://www.leadinggroup.org/rubrique69.html/
  58. Mazzucato, M. (2015). The entrepreneurial state: Debunking public vs. private sector myths. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  59. MDBs (Multilateral Development Banks). (2017). Mobilization of private finance by multilateral development banks (2016 Joint report). Available at: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/860721492635844277/2016-joint-report/
  60. Müller, J. (2016). Harnessing private finance to attain public policy goals? How governments try to involve the private sector in times of austerity and what risks this entails. Amsterdam: Centre for Research on Multinational Corporations (SOMO).Google Scholar
  61. Musgrave, R. A. (1959). Theory of public finance: A study in public economy. New York/London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  62. Nordhaus, W. D. (2006). Paul Samuelson and global public goods. In M. Szenberg, L. Ramrattan, & A. A. Gottesman (Eds.), Samuelsonian economics and the twenty-first century. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Nye, J. S., Jr. (2014). The regime complex for managing global cyber activities (Global commission on internet governance paper series 1 May 2014). Waterloo/London: Centre for International Governance Innovation/Royal Institute for International Affairs.Google Scholar
  64. Ocampo, J. A. (2016). Global economic and social governance and the United Nations system. In J. A. Ocampo (Ed.), Global governance and development (pp. 3–31). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ocampo, J. A. (2017). Resetting the international monetary non-system. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2016). Development assistance (DAC) high level meeting February 19, 2016: Communiqué. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/dac/DAC-HLM-Communique-2016.pdf/
  67. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2018). Making blended finance work for the sustainable development goals. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  68. Ostrom, E. (2010, June). Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American Economic Review, 100, 641–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ostrom, E. (2014). A polycentric approach for coping with climate change. Annals of Economics and Finance, 15(1), 97–134.Google Scholar
  70. Oxfam International. (2018). Climate finance shadow report 2018; assessing progress towards the $ 100 billion commitment. Oxford: Oxfam UK for Oxfam International.Google Scholar
  71. Patterson, J., Schulz, K., Vervoort, J., van der Hel, S., Widerberg, O., Adler, C., Hurlbert, M., Anderton, K., Sethi, M., & Barau, A. (2017). Exploring the governance and politics of transformations towards sustainability. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 24, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Pickhardt, M. (2006). Fifty years after Samuelson’s ‘the pure theory of public expenditure’: What are we left with? Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 28(4), 439–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rachman, G. (2017). Easternisation. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  74. Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S., Lambin, E. F., Lenton, T. M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H. J., Nykvist, B., de Wit, C., Hughes, T., van der Leeuwe, S., Rodhe, H., Sörlin, S., Snyder, P. K., Costanza, R., Svedin, U., Falkenmark, M., Karlberg, L., Corell, R. W., Fabry, V. J., Hansen, J., Walker, B., Liverman, D., Richardson, K., Crutzen, P., & Foley, A. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461(24 September), 472–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Samuelson, P. A. (1954). The pure theory of public expenditure. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 36(4), 387–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Samuelson, P. A. (1955). Diagrammatic exposition of a theory of public expenditure. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 37(4), 350–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sandler, T. (2004). Global collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sandmo, A. (2000). The public economics of the environment. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sandmo, A. (2007). The welfare economics of global public goods (NHH department of economics discussion paper no. 35/2007).  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1550703
  80. Sen, A. (1977). Rational fools: A critique of the behavioral foundations of economic theory. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 6(4), 317–344.Google Scholar
  81. Sen, A. (2007). Identity and violence: The illusion of destiny. London: Penguin Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Shaffer, G. (2012). International law and global public goods in a legal pluralist world. European Journal of International Law, 23(3), 669–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Stern, N. (2007). The economics of climate change: The stern review. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Stern, N. (2015). Why are we waiting? The logic, urgency, and promise of tackling climate change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  85. Stiglitz, J. E. (2014). Intellectual property rights, the pool of knowledge, and innovation (NBER working paper series 2014). Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  86. Stiglitz, J. E., & Rosengard, J. K. (2015). The economics of the public sector (4th ed., International student ed.). New York: Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  87. Thakur, R., & Maley, W. (2015). Introduction: Theorising global responsibilities. In R. Thakur & W. Maley (Eds.), Theorising the responsibility to protect (pp. 3–15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. UNDESA (United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs). (2012). World economic and social survey 2012: In search of new development finance. New York: United Nations.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme). (2017). The emissions gap report 2017. Nairobi: UNEP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. WBG (World Bank Group). (2017a). Forward look: A vision for the World Bank group in 2030; progress and challenges (Document DC2017-0002). Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  91. WBG (World Bank Group). (2017b). Maximizing finance for development: Leveraging the private sector for growth and sustainable development (DC2017_0009). Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  92. WBG and ECOFYS. (2018). State and trend of carbon pricing 2018 (May). Washington, DC: WBG.Google Scholar
  93. WBG-IEG. (2008, September). Annual review of development effectiveness 2008: Shared global challenges (Fast track brief 52607). Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  94. WBG-OED. (2002). The World Bank’s approach to global programs: An independent evaluation. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  95. WBG-OED. (2004). Addressing the challenges of globalization: An independent evaluation of the World Bank’s approach to global programs. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  96. WEF (World Economic Forum). (2018). The global risks report 2018. Geneva: World Economic Forum.Google Scholar
  97. Wyplosz, C. (2015). The centralization-decentralization issue (European economy discussion paper 014). Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Inge Kaul
    • 1
  1. 1.Hertie School of GovernanceBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations