Advertisement

Introduction

  • Olav GiereEmail author
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Biology book series (BRIEFSBIOL)

Abstract

This treatise is a subjective attempt to summarize thoughts on the future of meiobenthology. Based on recent publications in the field, it tries to reflect the state of the art, indicate gaps and risks and outline promising perspectives and potentials in meiobenthology. Therefore, the papers mentioned are examples demonstrating the lines of reasoning and the reference lists are selective without claiming completeness. These papers will be characterized briefly, though usually not commented in detail. In order to make each chapter a fairly independent and separately readable unit, a certain overlap in their contents and references listed is deliberate.

References

  1. Bluhm BA, Hop H, Vihtakari M et al (2018) Sea ice meiofauna distribution on local to pan-Arctic scales. Ecol Evol 8:2350–2364PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Creer S, Fonseca VG, Porazinska DL et al (2010) Ultrasequencing of the meiofaunal biosphere: practice, pitfalls and promises. Mol Ecol 19(Suppl):4–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Danovaro R, Company JB, Corinaldesi C et al (2010) Deep-sea biodiversity in the Mediterranean Sea: the known, the unknown, and the unknowable. PLoS ONE 5(8): e11832, 25 ppGoogle Scholar
  4. Dümmer B, Ristau K, Traunspurger W (2016) Varying patterns on varying scales: a metacommunity analysis of nematodes in European lakes. PLoS ONE 11(3):e0151866.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151866CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Giere O (2009) Meiobenthology. The microscopic motile fauna of aquatic sediments, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 527 ppGoogle Scholar
  6. Isimco (2016) Draft book of abstracts. In: 16th international Meiofauna conference, Heraklion, Greece, 3–8 July 2016, 182 ppGoogle Scholar
  7. Montagna PA, Baguley JG, Cooksey C et al (2013) Deep-sea benthic footprint of the deepwater horizon blowout. PLoS ONE 8(8):e70540.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070540
  8. Schmidt-Araya JM, Schmid PE, Tod SP, Esteban GF (2016) Trophic positioning of meiofauna revealed by stable isotopes and food web analyses. Ecology 97:3099–3109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Schratzberger M (2012) On the relevance of meiobenthic research for policy-makers. Mar Pollut Bull 64:2639–2644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Schratzberger M, Ingels J (2018) Meiofauna matters: the roles of meiofauna in benthic ecosystems. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 502:12–25 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2017.01.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Semprucci F, Balsamo M, Appoloni L, Sandulli R (2018) Assessment of ecological quality status along the Apulian coasts (eastern Mediterranean Sea) based on meiobenthic and nematode assemblages. Mar Biodivers 48:105–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. von Humboldt A (1845) Kosmos. Entwurf einer physischen Weltbeschreibung. Die Andere Bibliothek. Berlin (2004), 935 ppGoogle Scholar
  13. Warwick R (2018) The contrasting histories of marine and freshwater meiobenthic research—a result of differing life histories and adaptive strategies? J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 502:4–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Zeppilli D, Leduc D, Fontanier C et al (2018) Characteristics of meiofauna in extreme marine ecosystems: a review. Mar Biodivers 48:35–71 doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1007/s12526-017-0815-z

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universität Hamburg (Emeritus)HamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations