Advertisement

Is There Evidence of Asymmetries in the Adjustment of the Lending Rate Responses to Repo Rate Changes?

  • Eliphas Ndou
  • Nombulelo Gumata
  • Mthokozisi Mncedisi Tshuma
Chapter

Abstract

We find that the interest rate pass-through and the loan intermediation mark-up move in opposite directions and differs across the monetary policy tightening and loosening cycles. A high (low) mark-up is accompanied by a low (high) pass-through. In addition, positive repo rate changes are passed more to lending rate increase than policy rate decreases of the same magnitude. This is indicative of the asymmetric effects in the lending rate adjustment to increases and decreases in the repo rate changes. Evidence shows that the speed of correction towards equilibrium is bigger when lending rates are below the equilibrium compared to when lending rates are above the equilibrium. Lending rates adjusts upwards when below the equilibrium more quickly than adjusting downwards when they are above the equilibrium.

References

  1. Allen, J., & McVanel, D. (2009). Price movements in the Canadian residential mortgage market (Working Chapter No. 2009-13). Google Scholar
  2. Chan, K. S. (1993). Consistency and limiting distribution of the least squares estimator of a threshold autoregressive model. The Annals of Statistics, 21, 520–533.Google Scholar
  3. Enders, W., & Granger, C. W. J. (1998). Unit root tests an asymmetric adjustment with an example using the term structure of the interest rates. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 16, 304–311.Google Scholar
  4. Enders, W., & Siklos, P. L. (2001). Cointegration and threshold adjustment. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 19(2), 166–176.Google Scholar
  5. Niggle, C. J. (1987). A comment on the markup theory of bank loan rates. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 9(4), 629–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gumata, N., & Ndou, E. (2018). Labour market and fiscal policy adjustment to shocks: The role of price and financial stability. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  7. Kilian, L., & Vigfussion, R. J. (2011). Are the responses of US economy asymmetric to energy price increases and decreases? Quantitative Economic, 2(3), 419–453.Google Scholar
  8. MacKinnon, J. G. (1996). Numerical distribution functions for unit root and cointegration tests. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11(6), 601–618.Google Scholar
  9. Mackinnon, J. G., Haug, A. A., & Michellis, L. (1999). Numerical distributions functions of likelihood ratio tests for cointegration. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 14, 563–577.Google Scholar
  10. Valadkhani, A., & Anwar, S. (2012). Interest rate pass-through and the asymmetric relationship between cash rate and the mortgage rate. Economic Record, 88(282), 341–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Yildirim, D. (2012). Interest rates pass-through to Turkish lending rates: A threshold cointegration analysis. Economic Research Center Working Papers in Economics, 12(7).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eliphas Ndou
    • 1
  • Nombulelo Gumata
    • 2
  • Mthokozisi Mncedisi Tshuma
    • 3
  1. 1.South African Reserve BankPretoriaSouth Africa
  2. 2.PretoriaSouth Africa
  3. 3.National Planning Commission SecretariatPretoriaSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations