Advertisement

Digitised Narratives of Rape: Disclosing Sexual Violence Through Pain Memes

  • Kaitlynn MendesEmail author
  • Katia Belisário
  • Jessica Ringrose
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Crime, Media and Culture book series (PSCMC)

Abstract

Drawing from contemporary “pain memes” found across YouTube and Tumblr, this chapter explores the creative ways the public communicates painful personal experiences of sexual violence in a digital age. Using the concept of platform vernacular (Gibbs et al. 2015), this chapter argues that digital platforms such as Tumblr and YouTube, which emphasise materiality, produce new vernacular practices that shape how “digitized narratives” (Mendes et al. 2019) of sexual violence are not only disclosed and known, but felt and experienced. These digitised narratives, we argue, have some potential to contest normative narratives of rape, and open up space for more nuanced and intersectional narratives to emerge.

Keywords

Rape Affect Tumblr YouTube Feminism Pain meme 

References

  1. Ahmed, Sara. 2004. The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ahmed, Sara. 2017. Living a Feminist Life. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alcoff, Linda Martin. 2018. Rape and Resistance. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  4. Benedict, Helen. 1992. The Virgin and the Vamp: How the Press Covers Sex Crimes. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bivens, Rena, and Amy A. Hasinoff. 2017. Rape: Is there an app for that? An empirical analysis of the features of anti-rape apps. Information, Communication & Society.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2017.1309444.
  6. Black Women’s Blueprint. 2011. An open letter from Black women to the SlutWalk. Black Women’s Blueprint, September 23. http://www.blackwomensblueprint.org/2011/09/23/an-open-letter-from-black-women-to-the-slutwalk/. Accessed 30 December 2011.
  7. Bletzer, Keith V., and Mary P. Koss. 2004. Narrative constructions of sexual violence as told by female rape survivors in three populations of the southwestern United States: Scripts of coercion, scripts of consent. Medical Anthropology 23 (2): 113–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brownmiller, Susan. 1975. Against Our Will: Men, Women and Rape. Harmondsworth and New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  9. Burt, Martha. R. 1980. Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38 (2): 217–230.Google Scholar
  10. Carbado, Devon W. 2013. Colorblind intersectionality. Signs 38 (4): 811–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carter, Carter. 1998. When the “extraordinary” becomes “ordinary”: Everyday news of sexual violence. In News, Gender and Power, ed. Cynthia Carter, Gill Branston, and Stuart Allan, 219–232. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Cho, Alexander. 2015. Queer reverb: Tumblr, affect, time. In Networked Affect, ed. Ken Hillis, Susanna Paasonen, and Michael Petit, 43–57. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. Clough, Patricia, and Jean Halley (eds.). 2007. The Affective Turn: Theorizing the Social. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Collins, Patricia H. 2005. Black Sexual Politics: African Americans, Gender, and the New Racism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Crenshaw, Kimberlé. 1989. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist critique. University of Chicago Legal Forum 140: 139–167.Google Scholar
  16. Dean, Jodi. 2005. Communicative capitalism: Circulation and the foreclosure of politics. Cultural Politics 1 (1): 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dobson, Amy Shields. 2015. Girls’ “pain memes” on YouTube: The production of pain and femininity on a digital network. In Youth Cultures and Subcultures: An Australian Perspective, ed. Sarah Baker, Brady Robards, and Bob Buttigieg, 173–182. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Dodge, Alexa. 2016. Digitizing rape culture: Online sexual violence and the power of the digital photograph. Crime Media Culture 12 (1): 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Doherty, Kathy, and Irina Anderson. 1998. Perpetuating rape supportive culture: Talking about rape. The Psychologist 11: 583–587.Google Scholar
  20. Edgren, Monica. 2017. Conditional agency and sexual discourses in Swedish court narratives of rape: A historical perspective 1990–2013. Paper presented at Intersectional Narratives of Rape, April 5–6, Lund University, Lund.Google Scholar
  21. Fileborn, Bianca. 2017. Justice 2.0: Street harassment victims’ use of social media and online activism as sites of informal justice. British Journal of Criminology 57: 1482–1501.Google Scholar
  22. Fileborn, Bianca. 2018. Naming the unspeakable harm of street harassment: A survey-based examination of disclosure practices. Violence Against Women.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801218768709.
  23. Fotopoulou, Aristea. 2016. Feminist Activism and Digital Networks: Between Empowerment and Vulnerability. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fuchs, Christian. 2009. Information and communication technologies and society: A contribution to the critique of the political economy of the internet. European Journal of Communication 24 (1): 69–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gavey, Nicola. 2005. Just Sex? The Cultural Scaffolding of Rape. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Gibbs, Martin, James Meese, Michael Arnold, Bjorn Nansen, and Marcus Carter. 2015. #Funeral and Instagram: Death, social media, and platform vernacular, information. Communication & Society 18 (3): 255–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gunnarsson, Lena. 2018. “Excuse me, but are you raping me now?” Discourse and experience in (the grey areas of) sexual violence. NORA—Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 26 (1): 4–18.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2017.1395359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Harvey, Alison. 2016. Dreams, design, and exclusion: The aggressive architecture of the utopian internet. Paper presented at Film, Television & Media Studies Research Seminar Series, March 7, University of East Anglia.Google Scholar
  29. Hemmings, Clare. 2012. Affective solidarity: Feminist reflexivity and political transformation. Feminist Theory 13 (2): 147–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Herman Judith Lewis. 2005. Justice from the victim’s perspective. Violence Against Women 11 (5): 571–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. hooks, bell. 1989. Talking Back: Thinking Feminist, Thinking Black. Boston, MA: Southend Press.Google Scholar
  32. Jane, Emma J. 2014. “Your a ugly, whorish slut”: Understanding e-bile. Feminist Media Studies 14 (4): 531–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Järvinen, Justine, Angela Kail, and Iona Miller. 2008. Hard Knock Life: Violence Against Women—A Guide for Donors and Funders. London: New Philanthropy Capital.Google Scholar
  34. Kanai, Akane. 2016. Sociality and classification: Reading gender, race and class in a humorous meme. Social Media + Society 2 (4): 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116672884.
  35. Karlsson, Lena. 2018. Towards a language of sexual gray zones: Feminist collective knowledge building through autobiographical multimedia storytelling. Feminist Media Studies.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1467944.
  36. Keller, J., Mendes, K., and Ringrose, J. 2018. Speaking unspeakable things: Documenting digital feminist responses to rape culture. Journal of Gender Studies 27 (1): 22–36.Google Scholar
  37. Kelly, Liz. 1988. Surviving Sexual Violence. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  38. Kelly, Liz, and Jill Radford. 1990. “Nothing really happened”: The invalidation of women’s experiences of sexual violence. Critical Social Policy 10 (30): 39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Khoja-Moolji, Shenila. 2015. Becoming an “intimate public”: Exploring the affective intensities of hashtag feminism. Feminist Media Studies 15 (2): 347–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kitzinger, Jenny. 1998. The gender-politics of news production: Silenced voices and false memories. In News, Gender and Power, ed. Cynthia Carter, Gill Branston, and Stuart Allan, 186–203. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Loney-Howes, Rachel. 2015. Beyond the spectacle of suffering: Representations of rape in online anti-rape activism. Outskirts: Feminism Along the Edge 33: 1–17.Google Scholar
  42. Loney-Howes, Rachel. 2018. Shifting the rape script: “Coming out” online as rape. Frontiers: A Journal of Women’s Studies 39 (2): 26–57.Google Scholar
  43. Marcus, Sharon. 1992. Fighting bodies, fighting words: A theory and politics of rape prevention. In Feminists Theorize the Political, ed. Judith Butler and Joan W. Scott, 385–403. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Mardorossian, Catherine M. 2002. Toward a new feminist theory of rape. Signs 27 (3): 743–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mardorossian, Catherine M. 2014. Framing the Rape Victim: Gender and Agency Reconsidered. New Brunswick, NJ and London: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  46. McCosker, Andrew. 2014. Trolling as provocation: YouTube’s agonistic publics. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 20 (2): 201–217.Google Scholar
  47. Mendes, Kaitlynn, Jessalynn Keller, and Jessica Ringrose. 2018. Digitized narratives of sexual violence: A case study of #BeenRapedNeverReported and Who Needs Feminism? New Media & Society.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818820069.
  48. Mendes, Kaitlynn, Jessica Ringrose, and Jessalynn Keller. 2019. Digital Feminist Activism: Girls and Women Fight Back Against Rape Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. O’Neil, Tully. 2018. “Today I speak”: Exploring how victim-survivors use Reddit. Crime Justice Journal 7 (1): 44–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pease, Bob. 2010. Undoing Privilege: Unearned Advantage in a Divided World. London and New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  51. Powell, Anastasia. 2015. Seeking rape justice: Formal and informal responses to sexual violence through technosocial counter-publics. Theoretical Criminology 19 (4): 571–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Renae, Franiuk, Jennifer L. Seefelt, Sandy L. Cepress, and Joseph A. Vandello. 2008. Prevalence and effects of rape myths in print journalism: The Kobe Bryant case. Violence Against Women 14: 287–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Renninger, B. 2015. “Where I can be myself … where I can speak my mind”: Networked counterpublics in a polymedia environment. New Media & Society 17 (9): 1513–1529.Google Scholar
  54. Rentschler, Carrie. 2014. Rape culture and the feminist politics of social media. Girlhood Studies 7 (1): 65–82.Google Scholar
  55. Rentschler, Carrie, and Samantha Thrift. 2015. Doing feminism in the network: Networked laughter and the “binders full of women” meme. Feminist Theory 16 (3): 329–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ringrose, Jessica, and Emilie Lawrence. 2018. Remixing misandry, manspreading and dick pics: Networked feminist humour on tumblr. Feminist Media Studies.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1450351.
  57. Ringrose, Jessica, and Emma Renold. 2014. “F**k rape!”: Mapping affective intensities in a feminist research assemblage. Qualitative Inquiry 20 (6): 772–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ringrose, Jessica, and Valerie Walkerdine. 2008. Regulating the abject: The TV make-over as site of neo-liberal reinvention toward bourgeois femininity. Feminist Media Studies 8 (3): 227–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Roiphe, Katie. 1993. The Morning After: Sex, Fear, and Feminism on Campus. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  60. Salter, Michael. 2013. Justice and revenge in online counter-publics: Emerging responses to sexual violence in the age of social media. Crime Media Culture 9 (3): 225–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Shepherd, Tamara, Alison Harvey, Tim Jordan, Sam Srauy, and Kate Miltner. 2015. Histories of hating. Social Media + Society 1 (2): 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115603997.
  62. Soothill, Keith, and Sylvia Walby. 1991. Sex Crime in the News. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  63. Spry, Tami. 1995. In the absence of word and body: Hegemonic implications of “victim” and “survivor” in women narratives of sexual violence. Women and Language 13 (2): 27–32.Google Scholar
  64. Star, Susan L. 1999. The ethnography of infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist 43 (3): 377–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stewart, Kathleen. 2007. Ordinary Affects. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Thelwall, Mike, and Pardeep Sud. 2011. Commenting on YouTube videos: From Guatemalan rock to el big bang. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63 (3). http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/,  https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21679/pdf. Accessed 8 August 2018.
  67. van Zoonen, Liesbet, Farida Vis, and Sabina Mihelj. 2011. YouTube interactions between agonism, antagonism and dialogue: Video responses to the anti-Islam film Fitna. New Media and Society 13 (1): 1283–1300.Google Scholar
  68. Warfield, Katie. 2016. “Reblogging someone’s selfie is seen as a really nice thing to do”: Spatiality and emplacement within a non-dominant platform vernacular on Tumblr. Paper presented at the Association of Internet Researchers Conference, October 5–8, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
  69. Wolbert Burgess, Ann, Annie Lewis-O’Connor, M. Elaine Nugent-Borakove, and Patricia Fanflik. 2009. Victim services and SANE/SART programs. In Practical Aspects of Rape Investigations, 4th ed., ed. Robert R. Hazlewood and Ann Wolbert Burgess, 39–51. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  70. Wolf, Naomi. 1993. Fire with Fire: The New Female Power and How to Use It. New York: Random.Google Scholar
  71. Wood, Linda A., and Heather Rennie. 1994. Formulating rape: The discursive construction of victims and villains. Discourse and Society 5: 125–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Young, Stacey L., and Katheryn C. McGuire. 2003. Talking about sexual violence. Women and Language 26 (2): 40–52.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kaitlynn Mendes
    • 1
    Email author
  • Katia Belisário
    • 2
  • Jessica Ringrose
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Media, Communication and SociologyUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK
  2. 2.University of BrasiliaBrasíliaBrazil
  3. 3.University College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations