Advertisement

Campus-Community Partnership in Professional Education: Architecture and Planning Students Reflect on Community-Engaged Courses

  • Rachel KallusEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

During the academic year 2011–2012 the Social Hub, a socially engaged research and education center at the Technion, aiming to advance social change through campus-community partnerships, supported 11 courses in the architecture and planning programs. This support was intended to encourage community-engaged professional education, seen as an opportunity to influence how future architects and planners perceive their professional role and impact professional practice at large. A study initiated by the Social Hub aimed to understand the impact of these courses on community-engaged professional education. The study was based on the analysis of students’ reflections, using integrated qualitative and quantitative methods. Findings suggest a tension between the academy and the profession, stressing the role of the academy in developing innovative knowledge that can push the profession toward a more democratic and engaged practice. They point that the support given by the Social Hub needs to focus on learning processes, especially on the extra knowledge professional instructors need while incorporating community-engaged contents in their courses.

References

  1. Angotti, T., Doble, C. S., & Horrigan, P. (Eds.). (2012). Service-Learning in Design and Planning: Educating at the Boundaries. Oakland, CA: New Village Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bandyopadhyay, S., Lomholt, J., Temple, N., & Tobe, R. (Eds.). (2010). The Humanities in Architectural Design: A Contemporary and Historical Perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Bell, B., & Wakeford, K. (Eds.). (2008). Expanding Architecture: Design as Activism. New York: Metropolis Books.Google Scholar
  4. Bose, M., Horrigan, P., Doble, C., & Shipp, S. C. (Eds.). (2014). Community Matters: Service-Learning in Engaged Design and Planning. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Butin, D. W. (2010). Service Learning in Theory and Practice: The Future of Community Engagement in Higher Education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chase, J., Crawford, M., & Kaliski, J. (1999). Everyday Urbanism. New York: Monacelli Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cuff, D. (1992). Architecture: The Story of Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Dutton, T. (1987). Design and Studio Pedagogy. Journal of Architectural Education, 41(1), 16–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dutton, T. A., & Mann, L. H. (Eds.). (1996). Restructuring Architecture: Critical Discourses and Social Practices. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  10. Fincher, R., & Iveson, K. (2008). Planning and Diversity in the City: Redistribution, Recognition and Encounter. London: Red Globe Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Flanders Cushing, D., Bates, I., & Van Vliet, W. (2013). Pedagogy and Community Engagement in Environmental Design Courses. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 30(2), 167–180.Google Scholar
  12. Golan, D., & Rosenfeld, Y. (2015). Learning from the Successes of Academy-Community Courses in Israel. Giluy Daat, 7, 13–36. [In Hebrew].Google Scholar
  13. Golan, D., & Shalhoub-Kevorkian, N. (2014). Community-Engaged Courses in a Conflict Zone: A Case Study of the Israeli Academic Corpus. Journal of Peace Education, 11(2), 181–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gregory, A., & Heiselt, A. (2014). Reflecting on Service-Learning in Architecture: Increasing the Academic Relevance of Public Interest Design Projects, Globalizing Architecture: Flows and Disruptions. 102nd ACSA Annual Meeting Proceedings.Google Scholar
  15. Hamdi, N. (2011). The Placemaker’s Guide to Building Community. London: Earthscan Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Hardin, M. C. (Ed.). (2006). From the Studio to the Streets: Service Learning in Planning and Architecture. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.Google Scholar
  17. Healy, P. (2006). Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hefetz, S., & Kallus, R. (forthcoming). Educating Planners as Social Entrepreneurs: The Potential of Community-Based Professional Training. PlaNext.Google Scholar
  19. Hender-Voss, A., & Hender-Voss, S. (2008). Designing with an Asset-Based Approach. In B. Bell & K. Wakeford (Eds.), Expanding Architecture: Design as Activism (pp. 124–131). New York: Metropolis Books.Google Scholar
  20. Holston, J., & Appadurai, A. (1996). Cities and Citizenship. Public Culture, 8(2), 187–204.Google Scholar
  21. Kallus, R. (2016). Citizenship in Action: Participatory Urban Visualization in Contested Urban Space. Journal of Urban Design, 21(5), 616–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kallus, R. (2018), Planning in a Mixed City: Professional Responsibility, Social Change and Spatial Justice. Haifa: Social Hub, Technion. [In Hebrew].Google Scholar
  23. Landry, C., & Wood, P. (2012). The Intercultural City: Planning for Diversity Advantage. London: Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Manzo, L. C., & Perkins, D. (2006). Finding Common Ground: The Importance of Place and Place Attachment to Community Participation and Planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 20(4), 335–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marcos, R., & Weiland, U. (Eds.). (2013). Handmade Urbanism: Mumbai, São Paulo, Istanbul, Mexico City, Cape Town: From Community Initiatives to Participatory Models. Berlin: Jovis.Google Scholar
  26. Reardon, K., & Forester, J. (Eds.). (2015). Rebuilding Community After Katrina: Transformative Education in the New Orleans Planning Initiative. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Rios, J. (2011). Reconsidering the Margin: Relationships of Difference and Transformative Education. In T. Angotti, C. Doble, & P. Horrigan (Eds.), Service-Learning in Design and Planning: Educating at the Boundaries (pp. 39–54). Oakland, Canada: New Village Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rooij, R., & Frank, A. (2016). Educating Spatial Planners for the Age of Co-Creation: The Need to Risk Community, Science and Practice Involvement in Planning Programmers and Curricula. Planning Practice & Research, 31(5), 473–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rydin, Y., & Pennington, M. (2000). Public Participation and Local Environmental Planning: The Collective Action Problem and the Potential of Social Capital. Local Environment, 5(2), 153–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sandercock, L., & Attili, G. (2010). Multimedia Explorations in Urban Policy and Planning. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Serageldin, I. (Ed.). (1997). The Architecture of Empowerment. London: Academy Editions.Google Scholar
  32. Soria, K. M., & Mitchell, T. D. (Eds.). (2016). Civic Engagement and Community Service at Research Universities: Engaging Undergraduates for Social Justice, Social Change and Responsible Citizenship. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  33. Stohr, K., & Sinclair, C. (2006). Design Like You Give a Damn: Architectural Responses to Humanitarian Crises. Melbourne: Metropolis Books.Google Scholar
  34. Stohr, K., & Sinclair, C. (2012). Design Like You Give a Damn: Building Change from the Ground Up. New York: Harry N. Abrams.Google Scholar
  35. Vowles, H., Low, J., & Doron, H. R. (2012). Investigating Architecture Studio Culture in the UK: A Progress Report. Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 7(2), 26–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wallin, S., & Horelli, L. (2012). Playing with the Glocal Through Participatory E-Planning. Journal of Community Informatics, 8(3), 2–34.Google Scholar
  37. Watson, D., Hollister, R. M., Stroud, S. E., & Babcock, E. (2011). The Engaged University: International Perspectives on Civic Engagement. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Winkler, T. (2013). At the Coalface: Community-University Engagements and Planning Education. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 33(2), 215–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Architecture and Town PlanningTechnion—Israel Institute of TechnologyHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations