Advertisement

Using Knowledge from Management Science in the Context of the Church: Possibilities and Limitations

  • Günter Müller-StewensEmail author
  • Luigi Gioia
Chapter
Part of the CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance book series (CSEG)

Abstract

Like any other organization, orders also have to adjust their way of managing to cope with the changing environment. Although they live behind the walls of the monastery, these walls are becoming more and more permeable (e.g. the impact of the internet). Some are doing this by looking for ways to transfer management knowledge and tools from the corporate world. But such “managerialism” has clear limits. If they are not perceived and respected it puts the monastic community in danger. In this chapter the authors reflect on the possibilities and limitations of using knowledge of management science in the context of the church. They see a clear danger in doing too much of this managerialism; to find the right measure it takes a lot of sensibility towards the specific context.

References

  1. Casey, M., & Tomlins, D. (2006). Introducing the Benedict’s rule. St. Ottilien: EOS.Google Scholar
  2. Dent, E. B., Higgins, M. E., & Wharff, D. M. (2005). Spirituality and leadership: An empirical review of definitions, distinctions, and embedded assumptions. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(5), 625–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gundolf, K., & Filser, M. (2013). Management research and religion: A citation analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(1), 177–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Jacobs, A., & Wilford, R. (2010). Listen first: A pilot system for managing downward accountability in NGOs. Development in Practice, 20, 797–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Karakas, F. (2010). Spirituality and performance in organizations: A literature review. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(1), 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kieser, A. (1987). From asceticism to administration of wealth. Medieval monasteries and the pitfalls of rationalization. Organization Studies, 8, 103–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kleymann, B., & Malloch, H. (2010). The rule of Saint Benedict and corporate management. Employing the whole person. Journal of Global Responsibility, 1(2), 207–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Meyer, M., & Maier, F. (2017). Managerialismus. Eine Herausforderung (nicht nur) für NPOs. Die Unternehmung, 71(2), 104–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mitschke-Collande, T. (2012). Schafft sich die katholische Kirche ab? Analysen und Fakten eines Unternehmensberaters. München: Kösel-Verlag.Google Scholar
  10. Payer-Langthaler, S., & Feldbauer-Durstmüller, B. (2012). Performance Management im Kloster. Das Beispiel der Benediktiner in Österreich. In M. Gmür, R. Schauer, & L. Theuvsen (Eds.), Performance management in nonprofit-organisationen. Theoretische Grundlagen, empirische Ergebnisse und Anwendungsbeispiele (pp. 98–108). Bern: Haupt Verlag.Google Scholar
  11. Radcliffe, T. (2000a). Call you friends. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  12. Radcliffe, T. (2000b). Der Thron Gottes. Ansprache auf dem Äbtekongress 2000. Monastische Informationen, 4, 24–32.Google Scholar
  13. Rost, K., lnauen, E., Osterloh, M., & Frey, B. S. (2010). The corporate governance of Benedictine abbeys: What can stock corporations learn from monasteries? Journal of Management History, 16, 90–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Soegtrop, U. (2003). Nachhaltiger Wandel im Kloster. Organisationale Veränderungsprozesse in der Benediktinerabtei Burg Dinklage. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  15. Tracey, P. (2012). Religion and organization: A critical review of current trends and future directions. Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 87–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of St. GallenSt. GallenSwitzerland
  2. 2.Von Hügel Institute, St. Edmund’s College, University of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations