Advertisement

The 2003 Iraq War

  • Julie GareyEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in International Relations book series (PSIR)

Abstract

The execution of the 2003 Iraq War, like the war in Afghanistan, resulted from US foreign policy changes in the post-9/11 period. However, unlike Afghanistan, the United States lacked widespread support for intervention. This chapter begins with an introduction to the disputes between the United States, the UN, and NATO over the Iraq War. The second section of this chapter demonstrates the effects of the Iraq debate on US-NATO relations. The third section of this chapter further addresses the question of legitimacy. I demonstrate how the United States first pursued international support via the United Nations, then multilateral support through NATO, and finally assembled the coalition because it wanted to enhance the legitimacy of its actions. The legitimacy of the United States’ actions in Iraq was not significantly challenged by the absence of NATO. The United States’ continued engagement with NATO also served a practical purpose—because the allies were fully engaged in Afghanistan, the United States could divert additional resources to the Iraq effort. Although the alliance did not undertake the war in Iraq, there is no evidence of the Bush administration devaluing the utility of the alliance, or the importance of multilateralism.

References

  1. Allen, Mike, and Robin Wright. 2004. Bush Seeks NATO Help on Iraq. The Washington Post, June 25.Google Scholar
  2. Barbero, Michael (USA-Ret., Former Commander NTM-I). Interview with Author, Jan 15, 2015.Google Scholar
  3. Bjola, Corneliu. 2009. Legitimising the Use of Force in International Politics, Contemporary Security Studies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Black, Ian, and Michael White. 2003. Chirac Pledges to Veto New Resolution. The Guardian, February 17. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/feb/18/iraq.france/print
  5. Borger, Julian. 2002. Straw Threat to Bypass UN Over Attack on Iraq. The Guardian, October 18. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2002/oct/19/iraq.foreignpolicy
  6. Buchanan, Allen. 2010. Human Rights, Legitimacy, and the Use of Force. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bush, George W. Remarks Following a Meeting with Secretary of State Colin L. Powell and an Exchange with Reporters. Last Modified Sept 19, 2002. www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/print.php?pid=73123. Accessed 8 Apr 2015.
  8. ———. Address to the Nation on Iraq from Cincinnati, Ohio. Last Modified Oct 7. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/print.php?pid=73139. Accessed 8 Apr 2015.
  9. Daalder, Ivo H. 2007. Beyond Preemption. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  10. Davidson, Jason. 2011. America’s Allies and War. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dempsey, Judy. 2011. Beginning of the End for NATO. The New York Times, June 14. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/14/world/europe/14iht-letter14.html?ref=libya
  12. Ek, Carl. 2007. NATO’s Prague Capabilities Commitment. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
  13. Fukuyama, Francis. 2006. America at the Crossroads: Democracy, Power, and the Neoconservative Legacy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Gallup. 2014. Presidential Approval Ratings – George W. Bush. Last Modified July 14. http://www.gallup.com/poll/116500/presidential-approval-ratings-george-bush.aspx
  15. Gordon, Phillip H. 2002. NATO and the War on Terrorism a Changing Alliance. The Brookings Review 20 (3): 36–38.Google Scholar
  16. Gordon, Philip, and Jeremy Shapiro. 2004. Allies at War: America, Europe, and the Crisis Over Iraq. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  17. Graham, Bradley, and Robert G. Kaiser. 2002. On Iraq Action, US Is Keeping NATO Sidelined. The Washington Post, September 24.Google Scholar
  18. Hendrickson, David C., and Robert W. Tucker. 2004. The Sources of American Legitimacy. Foreign Affairs 83: 18–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Holsti, Ole R. 2011. American Public Opinion on the Iraq War. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Independent International Commission on Kosovo. 2000. The Kosovo Report: Conflict, International Response, Lessons Learned. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jehl, Douglas. 2003. U.S. Bars Iraq Contracts for Nations that Opposed War. The New York Times, December 9. http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/09/international/middleeast/09CND-DIPL.html
  22. Kaplan, Lawrence S. 2004. NATO Divided, NATO United. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  23. Kitchen, Veronica M. 2010. The Globalization of NATO: Intervention, Security and Identity. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kornblut, Anne E., and Susan Milligan. 2002. President Seeking Free Hand on Iraq Congress Asked to Endorse Unilateral Action in Region. Boston Globe, September 20.Google Scholar
  25. Kramer, Anne. 2007. What the World Thinks. In Beyond Preemption: Force and Legitimacy in a Changing World, ed. I.H. Daalder. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  26. Kreps, Sarah E. 2011. Coalitions of Convenience: United States Military Interventions After the Cold War. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lansford, Tom. 2012. 9/11 and the Wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar
  28. Mihalka, Michael. 2005. NATO Response Force: Rapid? Responsive? A Force? Connect 4 (2): 67–80. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26323172
  29. Miles, Donna. 2004. NATO Response Force Ready for Duty, Rumsfeld Says. June 27. http://www.defense.gov/News/NewsArticle.aspx?ID=26194. Accessed 6 Apr 2015.
  30. Mueller, John. 2005. Force, Legitimacy, Success, and Iraq. Review of International Studies 31: 109–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. NATO. The Defence Planning Committee (Archived). Last Modified Mar 28, 2012. http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/topics_49201.htm. Accessed 20 June 2014.
  32. ———. NATO Response Force. http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/topics_49755.htm. Accessed 24 July 2014.
  33. ———. NATO Assistance to Iraq. Last Modified Sept 1, 2015. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_51978.htm
  34. Pew Global Attitudes Project. What the World Thinks in 2002. Last Modified Dec 4, 2002. http://www.pewglobal.org/files/2002/12/2002-Report-Final-Updated.pdf. Accessed 8 Apr 2015.
  35. Powell, Colin. 2003. An Enlarged NATO: Mending Fences and Moving Forward on Iraq, Hearing Before the Comm. On Foreign Relations. 108th Cong. United States Senate.Google Scholar
  36. Richburg, Keith B. 2003. NATO Blocked on Iraq Decision: France, Germany Lead Opposition to War. The Washington Post, January 23.Google Scholar
  37. Ricks, Thomas E. 2003. NATO Allies Trade Barbs Over Iraq. The Washington Post, February 9.Google Scholar
  38. Rupp, Richard E. 2006. NATO After 9/11: An Alliance in Continuing Decline. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schmidt, Brian C., and Michael C. Williams. 2008. The Bush Doctrine and the Iraq War: Neoconservatives Versus Realists. Security Studies 17 (2): 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sciolino, Elaine. 2004. NATO Chief Says Iraq and Afghanistan Are Doomed Without World Cooperation. The New York Times, July 2.Google Scholar
  41. Shanker, Thom. 2003. Rumsfeld Rebukes the UN and NATO on Iraq Approach. The New York Times, February 9.Google Scholar
  42. Shimko, Keith L. 2006. The Iraq Wars and America’s Military Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Shribman, David M. 2002. President Gambles, with Odds in His Favor. Boston Globe, September 5.Google Scholar
  44. Sloan, Stanley R. 2005. NATO, the European Union, and the Atlantic Community. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  45. ———. 2006. Transatlantic Security Relations. In The Transatlantic Divide: Foreign and Security Policies in the Atlantic Alliance from Kosovo to Iraq, ed. Osvalso Croci and Amy Verdun. New York: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Smith, Edward M. 2003. Collective Security, Peacekeeping, and Ad Hoc Multilateralism. In Democratic Accountability and the use of Force in International Law, ed. Ku Charlotte and Harold K. Jacobson. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  47. U.S. Department of Defense. U.S. Will Propose a New, Agile Military Response Force for NATO. Last Modified Sept 24, 2002. http://iipdigital.usembassy.gov/st/english/article/2002/09/20020920183018porth@pd.state.gov0.751034.html#axzz3EozjCWk2. Accessed 14 July 2014.
  48. U.S. House of Representatives. 2002. H.J. Res. 114 Authorization for use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002. 107th Congress Session.Google Scholar
  49. United Nations Security Council. Security Council Endorses Formation of Sovereign Interim Government in Iraq (Resolution 1546) [Press Release]. Last Modified Aug 6, 2004. https://www.un.org/press/en/2004/sc8117.doc.htm
  50. Weisman, Steven R. 2003. Fallout from Iraq Rift: NATO May Feel a train. The New York Times, February 11. http://www.nytimes.com/2003/02/11/international/middleeast/11ASSE.html
  51. Weitsman, Patricia. 2010. Wartime Alliances Versus Coalition Warfare. Strategic Studies Quarterly 4 (2): 113–136.Google Scholar
  52. ———. 2014. Waging War: Alliances, Coalitions, and Institutions of Interstate Violence. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Williams, Michael J. 2008. NATO, Security, and Risk Management. Milton Park: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceNortheastern UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations