Advertisement

Alliances, NATO, and the Post-Cold War Era

  • Julie GareyEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in International Relations book series (PSIR)

Abstract

This chapter proceeds in two parts. First, it provides an examination of the existing the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) scholarship, in pursuit of situating the contributions of this book in advancing explanations for how and why the alliance persists with inclusion of a US-specific approach. Two somewhat disparate strands of literature endure: the first strand addressing the alliance’s evolution and persistence, and the second strand centering on interpreting US-NATO relations. From this, the framework upon which this book’s analysis is built. Disaggregation of the American influence on NATO reveals its role in facilitating change within the alliance, ensuring the alliance’s survival as well as American interests in doing so.

References

  1. Asmus, Ronald D., Richard L. Kluger, and F. Stephen Larrabee. 1993. Building a New NATO. Foreign Affairs 72 (4): 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barry, Charles. 2012. Building Future Transatlantic Interoperability Around a Robust NATO Response Force. Transatlantic Current 7: 1–14.Google Scholar
  3. Bjola, Corneliu. 2009. Legitimising the Use of Force in International Politics, Contemporary Security Studies. London: Routledge Ltd.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, Michael E. 1999. Minimalist NATO: A Wise Alliance Knows When to Retrench. Foreign Affairs 78 (3): 204–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, Seyom. 2015. The Just War Tradition. In The Use of Force: Military Power and International Politics, ed. Robert J. Art and Kelly M. Greenhill, 8th ed. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Inc.Google Scholar
  6. Cahen, Alfred. 1989. The Western European Union and NATO. McLean: Brassey’s Ltd.Google Scholar
  7. Crotty, William J. 1995. Post-Cold War Policy. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
  8. Daalder, Ivo H., and James Goldgeier. 2006. Global NATO. Foreign Affairs 85 (5): 105–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davidson, Jason. 2011. America’s Allies and War. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deudney, Daniel, and G. John Ikenberry. 1999. The Nature and Sources of Liberal International Order. Review of International Studies 25 (2): 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duffield, John S. 1994. NATO’s Functions After the Cold War. Political Science Quarterly 109 (5): 763–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. ———. 2001. Transatlantic Relations After the Cold War: Theory, Evidence, and the Future. International Studies Perspectives 2 (1): 93–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gelpi, Christopher. 1999. Alliances as Instruments of Intra-Allied Control. In Imperfect Unions: Security Institutions over Time and Space, ed. Helga Haftendorn, Robert Keohane, and Celeste Wallander. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Gordon, Philip H. 1997. NATO’s Transformation: The Changing Shape of the Alliance. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. Gordon, Phillip H. 2002. NATO and the War on Terrorism a Changing Alliance. The Brookings Review 20 (3): 36–38.Google Scholar
  16. Gordon, Philip, and Jeremy Shapiro. 2004. Allies at War: America, Europe, and the Crisis over Iraq. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  17. Hallams, Ellen. 2009. The Transatlantic Alliance Renewed: The United States and NATO Since 9/11. Journal of Transatlantic Studies 7 (1): 38–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Holsti, Ole R., Philip Terrence Hopmann, and John D. Sullivan. 1973. Unity and Disintegration in International Alliances. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  19. Howard, Michael. 1999. An Unhappy Successful Marriage: Security Means Knowing What to Expect. Foreign Affairs 78 (3): 164–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jervis, Robert. 2002. Theories of War in an Era of Leading-Power Peace Presidential Address, American Political Science Association, 2001. American Political Science Review 96 (1): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jones, Philip. 2007. Colluding Victims: A Public Choice Analysis of International Alliances. Public Choice 132 (3/4): 319–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Keohane, Robert O. 1989. International Institutions and State Power. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  23. ———. 1990. Multilateralism: An Agenda for Research. International Journal 45 (4): 731–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. ———. 2002. Institutional Theory in International Relations. In Realism and Institutionalism in International Studies, ed. Michael Brecher and Frank P. Harvey. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  25. Klein, Bradley S. 1990. How the West Was One: Representational Politics of NATO. International Studies Quarterly 34 (3): 311–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Laird, Robbin F. 1991. The Europeanization of the Alliance. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  27. Lansford, Tom. 2012. 9/11 and the Wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar
  28. Leeds, B.A. 2003. Do Alliances Deter Aggression? The Influence of Military Alliances on the Initiation of Militarized Interstate Disputes. American Journal of Political Science 47 (3): 427–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Levi, Margaret. 1997. A Model, a Method, and a Map: Rational Choice in Comparative and Historical Analysis. In Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure, ed. Mark Lichbach and Alan Zuckerman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Mattox, Gale. 1999. NATO Enlargement and the United States: A Deliberate and Necessary Division? In The Future of NATO: Enlargement, Russia, and European Security, ed. Charles-Philippe David and Jack Lévesque. Ithaca: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  31. McCalla, Robert B. 1996. NATO’s Persistence After the Cold War. International Organization 50 (3): 445–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Morgenthau, Hans J. 1954. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  33. Morrow, James D. 1991. Alliances and Asymmetry: An Alternative to the Capability Aggregation Model of Alliances. American Journal of Political Science 35 (4): 285–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mowle, Thomas S., and David H. Sacko. 2007. Global NATO: Bandwagoning in a Unipolar World. Contemporary Security Policy 28 (3): 597–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. NATO. Operational Media Update: NATO and Libya. Last Modified Oct 31, 2011. http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_71994.htm. Accessed 9 Apr 2015.
  36. ———. NATO and Libya: Operation Unified Protector. Last Modified Mar 27, 2012. http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/71679.htm. Accessed 6 Sept 2017.
  37. Pierson, Paul. 2000. Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics. The American Political Science Review 94 (2): 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rhodes, Matthew. 2012. US Perspectives on NATO. In Understanding NATO in the 21st Century, ed. Graeme P. Herd and John Kriendler. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Risse-Kappen, Thomas. 1995. Cooperation Among Democracies: The European Influence on US Foreign Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Sandler, Todd, and James C. Murdoch. 2000. On Sharing NATO Defence Burdens in the 1990s and Beyond. Fiscal Studies 21 (3): 297–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sjursen, Helene. 2004. On the Identity of NATO. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs) 80 (4): 687–704.Google Scholar
  42. Sloan, Stanley R. 1985. Managing the NATO Alliance: Congress and Burdensharing. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 4 (3): 396–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sprecher, Christopher, and Volker Krause. 2006. Alliances, Armed Conflict, and Cooperation: Theoretical Approaches and Empirical Evidence. Journal of Peace Research 43 (4): 363–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Talbott, Strobe. 2002. From Prague to Baghdad: NATO at Risk. Foreign Affairs 81: 46–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Thies, Wallace J. 2009. Why NATO Endures. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Van Heuven, Marten. 2001. NATO and Europe: Equality or a More Balanced Partnership? Arlington: RAND Corporation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vincent, Jack E., Ira L. Straus, and Richard R. Biondi. 2001. Capability Theory and the Future of NATO’s Decisionmaking Rules. Journal of Peace Research 38 (1): 67–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wallander, Celeste A. 2000. Institutional Assets and Adaptability: NATO After the Cold War. International Organization 54 (4): 705–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Walt, Stephen. 1987. The Origins of Alliances. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Waltz, Kenneth N. 1986. Anarchic Orders and the Balances of Power. In Neorealism and Its Critics, ed. Robert Keohane, 98–130. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Weitsman, Patricia A. 2004. Dangerous Alliances: Proponents of Peace, Weapons of War. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Williams, Ellen. 2008. Out of Area and Very Much in Business? NATO, the U.S., and the Post-9/11 International Security Environment. Comparative Strategy 27 (1): 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceNortheastern UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations