Advertisement

The Parties of the Centre Right

  • James L. Newell
Chapter

Abstract

The most widely-accredited pre-election predictions of the outcome were that there would most likely be a hung parliament but that an overall majority for the centre right was possible. Either way, it appeared that Silvio Berlusconi and Forza Italia (FI) stood a good chance of being back as the driving force in Italian politics after the vote; for if no party or coalition seemed likely to be able to form the next government on its own, then the only viable alternative appeared to be a grand coalition involving an arrangement between FI and the Democratic Party. In the event, expectations were both fully met and completely belied. On the one hand, the centre right took a share of the vote exactly equivalent to its pre-election poll average. On the other hand, the unexpected redistribution of support that took place, within the coalition, from FI to the League, led to Berlusconi’s political marginalisation. This chapter seeks to make sense of this dual outcome by considering the voting shifts that underlay it; the strategic decisions made by the party leaders in the run-up to the election; and the ‘opportunity structure’ to which the party leaders sought to respond.

References

  1. Albertazzi, Daniele, Arianna Giovannini, and Antonella Seddone. 2018. ‘No Regionalism Please, We Are Leghisti!’ The Transformation of the Italian Lega Nord Under Matteo Salvini. Regional and Federal Studies 28 (5): 645–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bordignon, Fabio. 2018. Identikit dell’elettore e spazio politico. In Le Divergenze Parallele. L’Italia dal voto devoto al voto liquido, ed. Fabio Bordignon, Luigi Ceccarini and Ilvo Diamanti, 111–130. Rome and Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
  3. Calise, Mauro. 2000. Il partito personale. Rome and Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
  4. Cavallaro, Matteo, Lorenzo Pregliasco, and Salvatore Vassallo. (2018). Electoral System and Electoral Geography: While the Rosato Law Appeared to Be Proportional While It Is Not. Contemporary Italian Politics 10 (3): 224–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ceccarini, Luigi. (2018). Un nuovo cleavage? I perdenti e i vincenti (della globalizzazione). In Le Divergenze Parallele. L’Italia dal voto devoto al voto liquido, ed. Fabio Bordignon, Luigi Ceccarini and Ilvo Diamanti, 156–182. Rome and Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
  6. Duverger, Maurice. 1954. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  7. Feltrin, P., and P. Natale. 2008. Elezioni Politiche 2008. Primi risultati e primi scenari. Polena 1: 143–167.Google Scholar
  8. Castelli Gattinara, Pietro. 2017. The ‘Refugee Crisis’ in Italy as a Crisis of Legitimacy. Contemporary Italian Politics 9 (3): 318–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mastropaolo, Alfio. 2009. The Political Context: 2006–2008. In The Italian General Election of 2008: Berlusconi Strikes Back, ed. James L. Newell, 25–42. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Newell, James L. 2018. Silvio Berlusconi: A Study in Failure. Manchester: Manchester University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Poguntke, Thomas, and Paul Webb (eds.). 2005. The Presidentization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Saviano, Carmine. (2018). Elezioni, al via il silenzio dei sondaggi: le ultime rilevazioni certificano lo stallo. la Repubblica, 16 February. https://www.repubblica.it/politica/2018/02/16/news/ultimi_sondaggi-189007345/.
  13. Vampa, Davide. (2018). Il centrodestra a guida leghista. In Il vicolo cieco: Le elezioni del 4 marzo 2018, ed. Marco Valbruzzi and Rinaldo Vignati. Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • James L. Newell
    • 1
  1. 1.ManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations