M&E Systems for PIM/IMT Programs – Review of Experiences and Guidance for Their Application to WUOs

  • Roula KhadraEmail author
  • Juan Antonio Sagardoy


This chapter addresses the application of Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) methodologies to PIM/IMT programs. As a matter of fact, a major shortcoming of these programs worldwide, is the missed implementation of M&E systems that accompany them, and become a major instrument to correct, improve and learn. The main purpose of this chapter is to provide instruments that may help countries to reduce this gap.


  1. Burt CM, Clemmens AJ, Strelkoff T S, Solomon KH, Bliesner RD, Hardy LA, Howell TA, Eisenhauer DE (1997) Irrigation performance measures: efficiency and uniformity. J Irrigation Drainage Eng 123(6):423–442.
  2. Cornish GA (1998) Improved irrigation system planning and management. Aids to maintenance, incorporating guidelines for monitoring system condition. Report OD/TN 94. HR Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UKGoogle Scholar
  3. EU (2000) The Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC.
  4. FAO and IWMI (2007) Irrigation management transfer. Worldwide efforts and results. FAO Water Report No. 32. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  5. Khadra R, Sagardoy JA, Taha S, Lamaddalena N (2017) Participatory irrigation management and transfer: setting the guiding principles for a sustaining monitoring & evaluation system—a focus on the mediterranean. Water Resour Manag 31(13):4227–4238.
  6. Khadra R, Sagardoy JA, Taha S, Lamaddalena N (2018) MONEVA—a monitoring and evaluation system to assess performance of participatory irrigation management/ irrigation management transfer programs in the mediterranean region. Water Resour Manag 32(1):123–140. Scholar
  7. Levine G (1982) Relative water supply: an explanatory variable for irrigation systems. Technical Report No. 6. The Determinants of Irrigation Project Problems in Developing Countries. NY, Cornell University, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  8. Malano H, Burton M (2001) Guidelines for benchmarking performance in the irrigation and drainage sector. IPTRID Secretariat, FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  9. Passouant M, Le Gal PY, Keita B (2009) The contribution of information systems in maintaining large‐scale irrigation schemes. Irrig Drain 59:241–253.
  10. Sagardoy JA, Bottrall A, Uittenbogaard GO (1986) Organization, operation and maintenance of irrigation schemes. Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 40. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  11. Soto M, Álvarez V, Martín B (2014) El regadío en la Región de Murcia. Caracterización y análisis mediante indicadores de gestión. Sindicato Central De Regantes Del Acueducto Tajo Segura, Murcia, Spain.
  12. Taha S, Sagardoy JA (2013) Review of the international and regional experience in monitoring and evaluation systems with special reference for the formation and support of water users associations. SWIM-SM project Web. Accessed 18 Nov 2018
  13. USAID (2002) Irrigation management transfer: framework for monitoring and evaluation. Report No. 59 prepared by the IMT M&E Working Group for USAID, EgyptGoogle Scholar
  14. Verdier J, Millo JL (1992) Maintenance des périmètres irrigués. Ministère de la Coopération et du Développement. Ministère de la Coopération et du Développement, ParisGoogle Scholar
  15. WB (2008). Toolkit for monitoring and evaluation of agricultural water management projects. Agricultural and Rural Development Department. Water for Food Team. Ref 44799

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CIHEAM-Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of BariValenzano (BA)Italy
  2. 2.RomeItaly

Personalised recommendations