Global Security as a Central Objective of the Bilateral Partnership

  • Paul Soyez
Part of the Studies in Diplomacy and International Relations book series (SID)


Security has remained the most significant objective in the mutual engagement between Australia and France. Although opposing nuclear policies became the source of major French–Australian tensions, security has now become the main subject of cooperation between the two states, framed in 2012 within a Strategic Partnership. In the post-Cold War context where Asia’s position is growing fast, Australian decision-makers have felt the need to focus their diplomacy in the region. The deepening of bilateral relations has been a key instrument of this impetus, with Australia’s neighbouring states, such as Indonesia and France. This agenda is shared by France, which has recently developed a more assertive foreign policy towards Asia and the Pacific. Australian and French agendas have converged into a genuine strategic alliance to find solutions to global threats, especially to terrorism. The French–Australian partnership has been manifested most recently through Australia’s submarine contract with France, Canberra’s biggest military contract ever. In order to shift from considering the other as a threat to considering it as a partner for security, Australian and French foreign policy-makers not only had to change their perceptions of national interests, but also their mutual understandings. It was first and foremost by understanding their respective perceptions of security and then accommodating their approaches that French and Australian foreign policy-makers were able to foster cooperation on this issue. Moreover, both countries have used the protection of Antarctica as a leverage to foster their security cooperation. Finally, since the 2010s, Australia and France have considerably deepened their collaboration and forged an extremely tight security partnership, binding their strategies for the next few decades.


  1. Archives Nationales, Pierrefitte, France.Google Scholar
  2. National Archives of Australia, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  3. Australian Department of Defence 2016, Defence White Paper, Australian Department of Defence, Canberra.Google Scholar
  4. Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade 2017, Foreign Policy White Paper, Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Canberra.Google Scholar
  5. Beazley, K 2003, ‘The Hawke Years: Foreign Affairs and Defence’, in The Hawke Government, a Critical Retrospective, Pluto Press, Melbourne, pp. 347–366.Google Scholar
  6. Bizley, N 2017, ‘Julie Bishop’s Washington Mission: Find Out Who’s Running the Show’, The Interpreter, 22 February. Available at Accessed 1 November 2017.
  7. Buzan, B Wæver & de Wilde, J 1998, Security, a New Framework for Analysis, Lynne Riener, Boulders.Google Scholar
  8. Cook, M & Dalrymple, R 2014, ‘Relations with Indonesia’, in Australian Foreign Policy, Controversies and Debates, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 155–173.Google Scholar
  9. Davies, A 2017, ‘A Fall-Back Option for the Future Submarines?’ ASPI The Strategist, 3 October. Available at Accessed 8 November 2017.
  10. Davison, R & Khan, S 2014, ‘ANZUS and the Rise of China’, in Australian Foreign Policy, Controversies and Debates, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 136–154.Google Scholar
  11. Deutsch, K 1968, The Analysis of International Relations, Prentice Hall International, Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
  12. Firth, S 2011, Australia in International Politics, Allen & Unwin, Sydney.Google Scholar
  13. Gallois, D & Taix C 2016, Sous-marins vendus par DCNS à l’Australie: les coulisses d’un contrat ‘historique’, Le Monde, 26 April. Available at Accessed 17 July 2017.
  14. James, K 2016, ‘The ‘Arrogant French’: Examination of a Cliché in Australia’s Journalistic and Political Discourse’, Presentation at the ISFAR colloquium, 6 December.Google Scholar
  15. Jennings, P 2017, ‘Australia-EU Cooperation on Security, Foreign Policy and Development’, Australian Outlook, 5 June. Available at Accessed 3 November 2017.
  16. Le Corre, P & O’Hanlon M 2016, ‘France’s Pivot to Asia: It’s More Than Just Submarines’, The National Interest, 9 May. Available at Accessed 17 July 2017.
  17. Ministère français de la Défense 2013, Livre Blanc, Défense et sécurité nationale, Ministère français de la Défense, Paris. Google Scholar
  18. Nye, JS 2011, The Future of Power, Public Affairs, New York.Google Scholar
  19. O’Malley, N 2013, ‘Mali Crisis Is Australian’s Big UN Test, Says Envoy’, Sydney Morning Herald, 16 January. Available at Accessed 3 November 2017.
  20. Ohff, HJ 2017, ‘Nuclear Versus Diesel-Electric: The Case for Conventional Submarines for the RAN’, ASPI The Strategist, 11 July. Available at Accessed 8 November 2017.
  21. Piketty, T 2013, Le Capital au XXIe siècle, Seuil, Paris.Google Scholar
  22. Piquet, M 2000, Cold War in Warm Waters: Reflections on Australian and French Mutual Misunderstandings in the Pacific, The University of Melbourne Press, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  23. Puissochet, JP 1991, ‘Le Protocole au Traité sur l’Antarctique, relatif à la protection de l’environnement’, Annuaire français de droit international, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 755–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schultz, J & Wallis, J 2014, ‘Australia in the Pacific’, in Australian Foreign Policy, Controversies and Debates, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 174–192.Google Scholar
  25. Soyez, P 2017, ‘Macron and Turnbull Clarify Their Common Ambitions’, ASPI The Strategist, 27 July. Available at Accessed 30 July 2017.
  26. Synder, CA 1998, ‘Australia’s Pursuit of Regional Security into the 21st Century’, Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Védrine, H 2001, France in an Age of Globalisation, Brookings Institution Press, Washington.Google Scholar
  28. Wolfers, A 1962, Discord and Collaboration, Essays on International Politics, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Soyez
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations