Methodological and Theoretical Frameworks

  • Paul Soyez
Part of the Studies in Diplomacy and International Relations book series (SID)


This study of the development of the French–Australian bilateral partnership is based on a methodology combining a close reading analysis of primary textual documents and expert interviews. These documents are understood through a theoretical lens encompassing “smart power”, postmodern constructivism and interpretive theories. This research is conducted equally following empirical and theoretical approaches. Postmodern constructivist theories provide the book with relevant readings of the topic’s global issues, such as Joseph Nye’s definition of smart power strategies, while interpretive theories frame the analysis of the actors’ representations and arguments. However, these theories have some limitations that oblige the researcher to conduct his research not only with a theoretical framework but also by using empirical methods. The first methodological step of this research required a systematic analysis of archives. More than a year has been dedicated to the investigation of the following primary sources: archives, official statements, newspapers, other academic and journalistic commentary and surveys of public opinion. The second step of the research has required fifteen interviews of some the main actors of the French–Australian bilateral relationship in the last ten years. As it reflects the research questions framing this research, the relevant literature encompasses academic studies published in both English and French. However, it must be noted that French academic research pertaining to Australian diplomacy is characterised by its rarity. The same assessment can be made regarding Australian publications on French politics. In fact, such studies are noticeably limited, and consequently one of the core aims of this study has been to fill this lack of information in France and in Australia about both countries’ diplomatic actions since the end of the Cold War, focusing especially on the processes that have led to the constitution of the current French–Australian partnership. These diverse sources, combined with a review of relevant literature, have enabled an analysis in depth, and with originality, of the most important issues concerning the evolutions of the French–Australian relationship.


  1. Aldrich, R 1994, France and the South Pacific Since 1940, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  2. Alomes, S & Provis, M 1998, French Worlds—Pacific Worlds, French Nuclear Testing in Australia’s Backyard, Two Rivers Press, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  3. Althaus, C, Bridgman, P & Davis, G 2013, The Australian Policy Handbook, Allen & Unwin, Sydney.Google Scholar
  4. Argounès, F 2006, Géopolitique de l’Australie, Complexe, Bruxelles.Google Scholar
  5. Argounès, F 2011, ‘L’Australie, entre puissance moyenne et puissance régionale : une analyse réaliste néoclassique’, Thesis (Ph.D.), Université Bordeaux 4, Bordeaux, France.Google Scholar
  6. Argounès, F 2012, ‘L’Australie: la tentation de la puissance régionale’, Pouvoirs, vol. 2, no. 141, pp. 103–116. Google Scholar
  7. Baldino, D 2005, ‘Australia and the World’, in C Aulich & R Wettenhall (eds), Howard’s Second and Third Governments, Australian National University Press, Canberra, pp. 189–207.Google Scholar
  8. Baldino, D, Carr, A & Langlois, AJ 2014, Australian Foreign Policy, Controversies and Debates, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  9. Ball, D & Richelson, JT 1985, The Ties That Bind, Allen & Unwin, Sydney.Google Scholar
  10. Beazley, K 2003, ‘The Hawke Years: Foreign Affairs and Defence’, in S Ryan & T Bramston (eds), The Hawke Government, a Critical Retrospective, Pluto Press, Melbourne, pp. 347–366.Google Scholar
  11. Beeson, M 2003, ‘Australia’s Relationship with the United States: The Case for Greater Independence’, Australian Journal of Political Science, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 387–405.Google Scholar
  12. Beeson, M 2008, Institutions of the Asia-Pacific, ASEAN, APEC, and Beyond, Routledge, London and New York.Google Scholar
  13. Beeson, M & Hameiri, S 2017, Navigating the New International Disorder, Australia in World Affairs, 2011–2015, Oxford Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  14. Bernard, M 1995, Histoire de l’Australie, de 1770 à nos jours, naissance d’une nation du Pacifique, L’Harmattan, Paris. Google Scholar
  15. Bevir, M & Rhodes, R 2012, ‘Interpretivism and the Analysis of Traditions and Practices’, Critical Policy Studies, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 201–208.Google Scholar
  16. Blainey, G 1983, The Tyranny of Distance, Sun Books, Sydney.Google Scholar
  17. Boniface, P 1995, ‘Dissuasion et non-prolifération : un équilibre difficile, nécessaire mais rompu’, Politique étrangère, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 707–721.Google Scholar
  18. Boniface, P 1998, La France est-elle encore une grande puissance? Presses de Sciences Po, Paris.Google Scholar
  19. Bourke, J 2005, Fear, a cultural History, Virago, London.Google Scholar
  20. Bozo, F 2012, La politique étrangère de la France depuis 1945, Flammarion, Paris.Google Scholar
  21. Broinowski, A 2003, Howard’s War, Scribe, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  22. Broinowski, A 2007, Allied and Addicted, Scribe, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  23. Brown, P 2013, ‘Negotiating Postcolonial Identities in the Shadow of the EU: New Caledonia’, in R Adler-Nissen & UP Gad (eds), European Integration and Postcolonial Sovereignty Games: The EU Overseas Countries and Territories, Routledge, London, pp. 169–186.Google Scholar
  24. Carr, A & Robert, C 2010, ‘Foreign Policy’, in C Aulich & M Evans (eds), The Rudd Government, Australian National University Press, Canberra, pp. 241–258.Google Scholar
  25. Chappell, D 1999, ‘The Noumea Accord: Decolonisation Without Independence in New Caledonia?’, Pacific Affairs, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 373–391.Google Scholar
  26. Checkel, J 1998, ‘The Constructivist Turns in International Relations Theory’, World Politics, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 324–348.Google Scholar
  27. Choi, Y 2007, ‘L’importance de l’Union européenne dans les territoires français du Pacifique’, in Pouvoir(s) et politique(s) en Océanie, actes du XIXe colloque CORAIL, L’Harmattan, Paris, pp. 151–163.Google Scholar
  28. Commissions des Affaires étrangères de l’Assemblée nationale 1995, Rapport d’information sur les réactions internationales à la reprise par la France des essais nucléaires, Assemblée nationale française, Paris. Google Scholar
  29. Commissions des Affaires étrangères, de la Défense et des Forces armées du Senat français 1997, ‘L’Australie et la Nouvelle-Zélande, têtes de pont de la présence française dans la région Asie-Pacifique?’, Rapport d’information no. 290, Sénat français, Paris. Google Scholar
  30. Commissions des Affaires étrangères du Sénat français 2017, ‘Australie : le rôle de la France dans le nouveau monde’, Rapport d’information no. 222, Sénat français, Paris. Google Scholar
  31. Cordonnier, I 1995, La France dans le Pacifique sud: approche géostratégique, Publisud, Paris.Google Scholar
  32. Danielsson, B & M-T 1993, Mururoa, notre bombe coloniale: histoire de la colonisation nucléaire de la Polynésie française, L’Harmattan, Paris.Google Scholar
  33. David, D 1995, ‘La France et le monde: inventaire après essais’, Études, vol. 383, no. 6, pp. 581–590.Google Scholar
  34. Davis Cross, MK 2011, ‘Europe, a Smart Power?’, International Politics, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 691–706.Google Scholar
  35. De Montbrial, T & Gomart, T 2017, Notre intérêt national, quelle politique étrangère pour la France? Odile Jacob, Paris.Google Scholar
  36. Derville, G 1996, ‘Quand la machine médiatique s’emballe’, Communication et langages, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 17–32.Google Scholar
  37. Deutsch, K 1968, The Analysis of International Relations, Prentice Hall International, Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
  38. Downer, A 2000, ‘Australia’s Global Agenda, Speech to French Institute of International Affairs’, 31 January, viewed 1 August 2017,
  39. Downer, A 2001, ‘Australian Foreign Policy, a Liberal Perspective’, Australian Journal of International Affairs, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 337–341.Google Scholar
  40. Downer, A 2005, ‘Securing Australia’s Interests: Australian Foreign Policy Priorities’, Australian Journal of International Affairs, Canberra, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 7–12.Google Scholar
  41. Eck, J-F 2006, La France dans la nouvelle économie mondiale, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.Google Scholar
  42. Evans, G & Grant, B 1995, Australia’s Foreign Relations, The University of Melbourne Press, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  43. Finlayson, A 2007, ‘From Belief to Argument: Interpretive Methodology and Rhetorical Political Analysis’, British Journal of Politic and International Relations, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 545–563.Google Scholar
  44. Firth, S 2011, Australia in International Politics, Allen & Unwin, Sydney.Google Scholar
  45. Fisher, D 2013, France in the South Pacific: Power and Politics, Australian National University Press, Canberra.Google Scholar
  46. Fry, G 2015, ‘Recapturing the Spirit of 1971: Toward a New Regional Political Settlement in the Pacific’, SSGM Discussion Paper, vol. 3, Australian National University Press, Canberra, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
  47. Garran, R 2004, True Believer, John Howard, George Bush & the American Alliance, Allen & Unwin, Sydney.Google Scholar
  48. Grand, C 1997, ‘La diplomatie nucléaire du Président Chirac’, Relations internationales et stratégiques, no. 25, pp. 157–169.Google Scholar
  49. Gyngell, A 2017, Fear of Abandonment, Black Inc., Melbourne.Google Scholar
  50. Haas, P & Haas, E 2002, ‘Pragmatic Constructivism and the Study of International Institutions’, Millennium, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 573–602.Google Scholar
  51. Henningham, S 1992, France and the South Pacific: A Contemporary History, Allen & Unwin, Sydney.Google Scholar
  52. Henningham, S 1996, ‘Testing Times: France’s Underground Nuclear Tests and Its Relations with Asia-Pacific’, Modern and Contemporary France, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 81–92.Google Scholar
  53. Henningham, S 2017, ‘The Limits of Influence: Australia and the Future of New Caledonia, 1975 to 1988’, The Journal of Pacific History, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 482–500.Google Scholar
  54. Holm, U 2013, ‘French Concepts of State: Nation, patrie, and the Overseas’, in R Adler-Nissen & UP Gad (eds), European Integration and Postcolonial Sovereignty Games: The EU Overseas Countries and Territories, Routledge, London, pp. 145–151.Google Scholar
  55. Hynek, N & Teti, A 2010, ‘Saving Identity from Postmodernism? The Normalisation of Constructivism in International Relations’, Contemporary Political Theory, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 171–199.Google Scholar
  56. Kelly, P 1994, The End of Certainty, Allen & Unwin, Sydney.Google Scholar
  57. Kuhn, T 1979, ‘Metaphor in Science’, in A Ortony (ed), Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 409–419.Google Scholar
  58. Langmore, J 2005, Dealing with America: The UN, the US and Australia, University of New South Wales Press, Sydney.Google Scholar
  59. Langmore, J 2013, ‘Australia’s Campaign for Security Council Membership’, Australian Journal of Political Science, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 101–111.Google Scholar
  60. Le Quintrec, G 1998, La France dans le monde depuis 1945, Seuil, Paris.Google Scholar
  61. Maclellan, N 2014a, ‘François Hollande Says France Wants to Remain a Pacific Power: Is It Wishful Thinking?’, The Guardian, 18 November, viewed 1 August 2017,
  62. Maclellan, N 2014b, ‘The Complicated Politics of a French Defence Treaty’, The Crickey, 19 November, viewed August 2017,
  63. Maclellan, N 2015, ‘Transforming the Regional Architecture: New Players and Challenges for the Pacific Islands’, Asia Pacific Issues, no. 118, pp. 1–8. Google Scholar
  64. Maclellan, N & Chesnaux, J 1998, La France dans le Pacifique, de Bougainville à Mururoa, La Découverte, Paris.Google Scholar
  65. Mallatrait, C 2009, La France, puissance inattendue au XXIe siècle dans le Pacifique sud : éléments pour une approche géopolitique de l’Océanie, L’Harmattan, Paris.Google Scholar
  66. Manne, R 2004, The Howard Years, Black Inc. Agenda, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  67. McAllister, I & Ravenhill, J 1998, ‘Australian Attitudes Towards Closer Engagement with Asia’, The Pacific Review, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 119–141.Google Scholar
  68. McCallum, W 1992, ‘European Loyalist and Polynesian Political Dissent in New Caledonia: The Other Challenge to RPCR Orthodoxy’, Pacific Studies, vol. 15, no. 3. pp. 39–40.Google Scholar
  69. McDougall, D 2009, Australian Foreign Relations, Entering the 21st Century, Pearson, Sydney.Google Scholar
  70. Mohamed-Gaillard, S 2010a, ‘Les relations franco-australiennes en Océanie: représentations croisées de deux politiques régionales’, Outre-mers, vol. 97, no. 366, pp. 123–133. Google Scholar
  71. Mohamed-Gaillard, S 2010b, L’archipel de la puissance? La politique de la France dans le Pacifique Sud de 1946 à 1998, Peter Lang, Bruxelles.Google Scholar
  72. Mokaddem, H 2005, Kanaky et/ou Nouvelle-Calédonie, Expressions, Marseille.Google Scholar
  73. Murray, P 2016, ‘EU–Australia Relations: A Strategic Partnership in All but Name’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 171–191.Google Scholar
  74. Murray, P & Benvenuti, A 2014, ‘EU–Australia Relations at Fifty: Reassessing a Troubled Relationship’, Australian Journal of Politics and History, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 431–448.Google Scholar
  75. Murray, P, Warleigh-Lack, A & He, B 2014, ‘Awkward States and Regional Organisations: The United Kingdom and Australia Compared’, Comparative European Politics, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 279–300.Google Scholar
  76. Nossal, KR & Vivian, C 1997, A Brief Madness: Australia and the Resumption of French Nuclear Testing, Australian National University Press, Canberra.Google Scholar
  77. Nye, JS 2011, The Future of Power, Public Affairs, New York.Google Scholar
  78. Pan, C 2002, ‘A Case for Pragmatism and Self-Reflection in Australia’s Asia Thinking and Engagement’, Australia in the Asian Century White Paper, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Canberra.Google Scholar
  79. Piquet, M 2000, Cold War in Warm Waters: Reflections on Australian and French Mutual Misunderstandings in the Pacific, The University of Melbourne Press, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  80. Piquet, M 2004, Australie plurielle, L’Harmattan, Paris.Google Scholar
  81. Poirine, B 2013, ‘Will the EU and the Euro Lead to More Sovereignty? French Polynesia’, in R Adler-Nissen & UP Gad (eds), European Integration and Postcolonial Sovereignty Games: The EU Overseas Countries and Territories, Routledge, London, pp. 152–168.Google Scholar
  82. Pons, X 1988, Le géant du Pacifique, Economic, Paris.Google Scholar
  83. Pons, X 2000, L’Australie, entre Occident et Orient, La Documentation française, Paris.Google Scholar
  84. Purnendra, J 2006, ‘Japan-Australia Security Ties and the United States: The Evolution of the Trilateral Dialogue Process and Its Challenges’, Australian Journal of International Affairs, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 521–535.Google Scholar
  85. Ravenhill, J & Cotton, J 2007, Trading on Alliance Security, Australia in the World Affairs, 2001–2005, Oxford Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  86. Robinson, R 1996, Pathways to Asia, The Politics of Engagement, Allen & Unwin, Sydney.Google Scholar
  87. Ruggie, J 1998, ‘What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge’, International Organization, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 855–885.Google Scholar
  88. Sassen, S 2011, ‘Sociology, Globalization, and the Re-shaping of the National’, Theory Talk #43, 6 September, viewed 17 July 2017,
  89. Swedberg, R & Agevall, O 2005, The Max Weber Dictionary, Stanford University Press, Stanford.Google Scholar
  90. Synder, CA 1998, ‘Australia’s Pursuit of Regional Security into the 21st Century’, Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
  91. Tarte, S 2004, ‘Regionalism and Changing Regional Order in the Pacific Islands’, Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 312–324.Google Scholar
  92. Védrine, H 2001, France in an Age of Globalisation, Brookings Institution Press, Washington.Google Scholar
  93. Walker, D 1999, Anxious Nation: Australia and the Rise of Asia 1850–1939, The University of Queensland Press, Brisbane.Google Scholar
  94. Wendt, A 1992, ‘Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics’, International Organization, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 391–425.Google Scholar
  95. Wendt, A 1999, Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  96. Wendt, A 2003, ‘Why a State World Is Inevitable’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 491–542.Google Scholar
  97. Wesley, M 2007, The Howard Paradox, Australian Diplomacy in Asia, 1996–2006, Australia Broadcast Corporation, Sydney.Google Scholar
  98. Wesley, M & Warren, T 2000, ‘Wild Colonial Ploys? Currents of Thought in Australian Foreign Policy’, Australian Journal of Political Science, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 9–18.Google Scholar
  99. Wheeler, NJ 2013, ‘Investigation Diplomatic Transformations’, International Affairs, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 477–496.Google Scholar
  100. Wheeler, NJ & Booth, K 2008, The Security Dilemma: Fear, Cooperation and Trust in World Politics, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  101. White, H 2010, ‘Power Shift: Australia’s Future Between Washington and Beijing’, Quaterly Essay, vol. 39, pp. 1–74.Google Scholar
  102. Widmaier, W 2004, ‘Theory as a Factor and the Theorist as an Actor: The “Pragmatist Constructivist” Lessons of John Dewey and John Kenneth Galbraith’, International Studies Review, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 427–445.Google Scholar
  103. Wilson, EJ 2008, ‘Hard Power, Soft Power, Smart Power’, The Annals of the American Academic of Political and Social Sciences, vol. 616, pp. 110–124.Google Scholar
  104. Wolfers, A 1962, Discord and Collaboration, Essays on International Politics, The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Soyez
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations