• Paul Soyez
Part of the Studies in Diplomacy and International Relations book series (SID)


How did these France and Australia develop a deep strategic partnership, when only about two decades ago, a group of Australians bombed the French consulate in Perth to protest against French nuclear testing in the Pacific? Which interests, which personalities, which elements of the global context have led France and Australia to engage in a regional and global rapprochement, and what have been the human, economic and political prerequisites which enabled it? This book aims to investigate the dynamics behind this historically ambiguous relationship. More precisely, this study explains why and how France and Australia are currently engaged in a process of strategic and economic mutual empowerment and how this rapprochement has been possible, owing to thirty years of diplomatic efforts to overcome ongoing culturally and historically constructed misunderstandings and conflicts. This book demonstrates how French and Australian foreign policy-makers have understood that, in regard to their numerous common interests, both countries had to mutually empower each other in order to strengthen their own power, regionally and globally. This chapter argues that these inclusive dynamics of empowerment constitute the response of two diverse middle powers to current global threats and represent a tool suitable for modernising the strategies and practices of both countries’ diplomacies. This book is the first to propose an answer to these questions through the development of the French–Australian strategic partnership.


  1. Archives Nationales, Pierrefitte, France.Google Scholar
  2. National Archives of Australia, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  3. Antheaume, B & Bonnemaison, J 1988, Atlas des îles des États du Pacifique Sud, GIP Reclus/Publisud, Paris.Google Scholar
  4. Beeson, M 2014, ‘The Rise of the Indo-Pacific’, The Conversation, 3 May, viewed 30 October 2017,
  5. Beeson, M & Hameiri, S 2017, Navigating the New International Disorder, Australia in World Affairs 2011–2015, Oxford Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  6. Blainey, G 1983, The Tyranny of Distance, Sun Books, Sydney.Google Scholar
  7. Brenner, N 1999, ‘Globalisation as Reterritorialization: The Re-scaling of Urban Governance in the European Union’, Urban Studies, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 431–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, A 2010, ‘The Gorbachev Revolution and the End of the Cold War’, in MP Leffler & OA Westad (eds), The Cambridge History of the Cold War, Endings, Vol III, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 244–266.Google Scholar
  9. Davison, R & Khan, S 2014, ‘ANZUS and the Rise of China’, in D Baldino, A Carr & AJ Langlois (eds), Australian Foreign Policy, Controversies and Debates, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 136–154.Google Scholar
  10. De Montbrial, T & Gomart, T 2017, Notre intérêt national, quelle politique étrangère pour la France? Odile Jacob, Paris.Google Scholar
  11. Deutsch, K 1968, The Analysis of International Relations, Prentice Hall International, Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
  12. Di Méo, G 1996, Les territoires du quotidien, L’Harmattan, Paris.Google Scholar
  13. Farge, A 2002, ‘Penser et définir l’événement en histoire. Approche des situations et des acteurs sociaux’, Terrain, vol. 38, pp. 69–78.Google Scholar
  14. Frank, R, Haba, K & Momose, H 2009, The End of the Cold War and the Regional Integration, Aoyama Gakuin University Press, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  15. Guéhenno, J-M 1999, ‘Américanisation du monde ou mondialisation de l’Amérique?’ Politique Étrangère, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Langmore, J, Frydenberg, J & Parke, M 2014, ‘The Liberal/Labor Tradition’, in D Baldino, A Carr & AJ Langlois (eds), Australian Foreign Policy, Controversies and Debates, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 19–38.Google Scholar
  17. Lévy, J & Lussault, M 2009, Dictionnaire de la géographie et de l’espace des sociétés, Belin, Paris.Google Scholar
  18. McDougall, D 2009, Australian Foreign Relations, Entering the 21st Century, Pearson, Sydney.Google Scholar
  19. Mrgudovic, N 2008, La France dans le Pacifique sud: les enjeux de la puissance, L’Harmattan, Paris.Google Scholar
  20. Murray, P, Warleigh-Lack, A & He, B 2014, ‘Awkward States and Regional Organisations: The United Kingdom and Australia Compared’, Comparative European Politics, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 279–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nederveen Pieterse, J 1994, ‘Globalisation as Hybridization’, International Sociology, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 161–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nye, JS 2011, The Future of Power, Public Affairs, New York.Google Scholar
  23. Offenstadt, N 2006, Les mots de l’historien, Presses Universitaires du Mirail, Toulouse.Google Scholar
  24. Perkins, DD & Zimmerman, MA 1995, ‘Empowerment Theory, Research and Application’, American Journal of Community Psychology, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 569–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Piquet, M 2000, Cold War in Warm Waters: Reflections on Australian and French Mutual Misunderstandings in the Pacific, The University of Melbourne Press, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  26. Védrine, H 2001, France in an Age of Globalisation, Brookings Institution Press, Washington.Google Scholar
  27. White, H 2017, ‘The United States or China: ‘We Don’t Have to Choose’’, in M Beeson & S Hameiri (eds), Navigating the New International Disorder, Australia in World Affairs 2011–2015, Oxford Press, Oxford, pp. 93–108.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Soyez
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations