Advertisement

Pore Pressure in Different Settings

  • Troyee DasguptaEmail author
  • Soumyajit Mukherjee
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Oil and Gas Exploration & Production book series (AOGEP)

Abstract

Before 1980s geoscientists believed the main reason of overpressure was drilling-induced. Subsequently other processes, e.g., compaction disequilibrium and aquathermal expansion, responsible for overpressure were established. This chapter reports overpressure condition from two kinds of plate margins from several places in the world: (i) collisional margins especially at the accretionary prisms, subduction zones and decollement zones; and (ii) extensional margins such as rifts and passive margins where growth faults boundaries of continental shields are the zones of overpressure.

References

  1. Bastia R, Radhakrishna M (2012) Basin evolution and petroleum prospectivity of the continental prospectivity of the continental margins of India, vol 59. Developments of Petroleum Science, Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  2. Burgreen-Chan B, Meisling KE, Graham S (2016) Basin and petroleum system modelling of the East Coast Basin, New Zealand: a test of overpressure scenarios in a convergent margin. Basin Res 28:536–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carson B, von Huene R, Arthur M (1982) Small scale deformation structures and physical properties related to convergence in Japan Trench slope sediments. Tectonics I:277–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chatterjee A, Mondal S, Basu P, Patel BK (2012) Pore pressure prediction using seismic velocities for deepwater high temperature-high pressure well in offshore Krishna Godavari Basin, India. In: SPE oil and gas conference and exhibition held in Mumbai, India, SPE 153764, pp 1–20Google Scholar
  5. Chilingarian GV, Wolf KH (1988) Developments of sedimentology. In: Diagenesis II, vol 43. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  6. Cochrane GR, Moore JC, Lee HJ (1996) Sediment pore fluid overpressuring and its effect on deformation at toe of the Cascadia accretionary prism from seismic velocities. In: Bebout GE, Scholl DW, Kirby SH, Platt JP (eds) Subduction top to bottom: American geophysical union geophysical monograph, vol 96, pp 57–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Darby DJ, Beavan J (2001) Evidence from GPS measurements for contemporary plate coupling on the southern Hikurangi subduction thrust and partitioning of strain in the upper plate. J Geophys Res 106:30881–30891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dasgupta S, Mukherjee S (2017) Brittle shear tectonics in a narrow continental rift: asymmetric non-volcanic Barmer basin (Rajasthan, India). J Geol 125:561–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davis D, Suppe J, Dahlen FA (1983) Mechanics of fold and thust belts and accretionary wedges. J Geophys Res 88:1153–1172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fertl WH, Chilingarian GV, Rieke HH (1976) Abnormal formation pressures implications to exploration, drilling, and production of oil and gas resources, vol 2 (Chap. 9). Developments in Petroleum Science, Elsevier, pp 325–349Google Scholar
  11. Glennie KW (1986) Introduction to the petroleum geology of the North sea. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Hoboken, pp 63–86Google Scholar
  12. Grant WD, Madsen OS (1986) The continental shelf bottom boundary layer. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 18:265–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kothari V, Konar S, Naidu B, Desai A, Sunder VR, Goodlad S, Mohapatra P (2016) Lacustrine turbidites in rift basins: genesis, morphlogy and petroleum potential—a case study from Barmer Basin, Conference materialGoogle Scholar
  14. Larue DK, Speed RC (1984) Structure of accretionary prism complex of Barbados, II; Bissex hill. Geol Soc Am Bull 95:1360–1372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Law BE, Ulmishek GF, Slavin VI (1998) Abnormal pressures in hydrocarbon environments. In: Law BE, Ulmishek GF, Slavin VI (eds) Abnormal pressures in hydrocarbon environments. AAPG Memoir 70, pp 1–11Google Scholar
  16. Moore JC, Tobin H (1997) Estimated fluid pressures of the Barbados accretionary prism and adjacent sediments. In: Proceedings of the ocean drilling program, Scientific results, 156, pp 229–238Google Scholar
  17. Moore JC, Vrolijk P (1992) Fluids in accretionary prisms. Rev Geophys 30:113–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Moore JC, Shipley T, Goldberg D, Ogawa Y et al (1995) Abnormal fluid pressures and fault-zone dilation in the Barbados accretionary prism: evidence from logging while drilling. Geology 23:605–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Moore CJ, Barrett M, Thu MK (2012) High fluid pressures and high fluid flow rates in the Megasplay Fault Zone, NanTroSEIZE Kumano Transect, SW Japan. Geochem Geophy Geosyst, 13.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GC004181Google Scholar
  20. Mukherjee S (2011) Estimating the viscosity of rock bodies—a comparison between the Hormuz- and the Namakdan Salt Domes in the Persian Gulf, and the Tso Morari Gneiss Dome in the Himalaya. J Indian Geophys Union 15:161–170Google Scholar
  21. Mukherjee S, Kumar N (2018) A first-order model for temperature rise for uniform and differential compression of sediments in basins. Int J Earth Sci 107:2999–3004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mukherjee S, Talbot CJ, Koyi HA (2010) Viscosity estimates of salt in the Hormuz and Namakdan salt diapirs, Persian Gulf. Geol Mag 147:497–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nyein RK, MacLean L, Warris BJ (1977) Occurrence, prediction and control of geopressures on the Northwest shelf of Australia. APPEA J 17:64–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Osborne MJ, Swarbrick RE (1997) Mechanisms for generating overpressure in sedimentary basins: a reevaluation. Am Assoc Pet Geol 81:1023–1041Google Scholar
  25. Reeves SR, Kuustraa VA, Hill DG (1996) New basins invigorate U.S gas shales play. Oil Gas J 94:53–58Google Scholar
  26. Saffer DM (2003) Pore pressure development and progressive dewatering in underthrust sediments at the Costa Rican subduction margin: comparison with Northern Barbados and Nankai. J Geophys Res 108:B5Google Scholar
  27. Sahay B, Fertl WH (1988) Origin and evaluation of formation pressures. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordecht, Boston, London, p 292Google Scholar
  28. Screaton E, Saffer D, Henry P, Hunze S (2002) Porosity loss within underthrust sediments of the Nankai accretionary complex: implications for overpressures. Geology 30:19–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Soleimani B, Hassani-Giv M, Abdollahifard I (2017) Formation pore pressure variation of the Neocomian sedimentary succession (the Fahliyan Formation) in the Abadan Plain basin, SW of Iran. Geofluids.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6265341CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Geology, Geophysics and Petrophysics (Exploration)Reliance Industries LimitedNavi MumbaiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Earth SciencesIndian Institute of Technology BombayMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations