Advertisement

Conclusion

  • Martin Jähnert
Chapter
Part of the Archimedes book series (ARIM, volume 56)

Abstract

The history of the correspondence principle presented in this book has followed a theoretical tool and its use in many strands of research embedded in the patchwork of problems of quantum physics during the 1920s. In these highly local contexts, the implementation of the correspondence principle led to transformations of both the problems and the tool.

References

  1. Beller, Mara. 1999. Quantum Dialogue: The Making of a Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Blum, Alexander, Roberto Lalli, and Jürgen Renn. 2015. The Reinvention of General Relativity: A Historiographical Framework for Assessing One Hundred Years of Curved Space-time. Isis 106: 598–620.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Darrigol, Olivier. 1997. Classical Concepts in Bohr’s Atomic Theory. Physis: Rivista internazionale di storia della scienza 34: 545–567.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. Eckert, Michael. 2015. From Aether Impulse to QED: Sommerfeld and the Bremsstrahlen Theory. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 51: 9–22.ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hendry, John. 1984. The Creation of Quantum Mechanics and the Bohr-Pauli Dialogue. Studies in the History of Modern Science, vol. 14. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
  6. James, Jeremiah and Christian Joas. 2015. Subsequent and Subsidiary? Rethinking the Role of Applications in Establishing Quantum Mechanics. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences 45: 641–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Klein, Ursula. 2001. Paper Tools in Experimental Cultures. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32: 265–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kragh, Helge. 2012. Niels Bohr and the Quantum Atom: The Bohr Model of Atomic Structure 1913–1925. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Renn, Jürgen. 2007. Classical Physics in Disarray. In The Genesis of General Relativity. Einstein’s Zurich Notebook: Introduction and Source, ed. Michel Janssen, John D. Norton, Jürgen Renn, Tilman Sauer, and John Stachel, vol. 1, 21–80. New York and Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Seth, Suman. 2010. Crafting the Quantum: Arnold Sommerfeld and the Practice of Theory, 1890–1926. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Steinle, Friedrich. 2009. Scientific Change and Empirical Concepts. Centaurus 51: 305–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Jähnert
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Institut für Philosophie, Literatur-, Wissenschafts- und Technikgeschichte Fachbereich Wissenschaftsgeschichte, Technische Universität BerlinBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Max Planck Institute for the History of ScienceBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations