Advertisement

Exploring the Connection Between the Existence of Local Web Communities and Civic Activity: St. Petersburg Case Study

  • Sergei KudinovEmail author
  • Ekaterina Ilina
  • Ekaterina Grekhneva
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 947)

Abstract

Active development of information and communication technologies in recent decades has significantly affected modern life in cities. Civil society has obtained e-participation tools, such as tools for sending electronic appeals on problems of the urban environment to the authorities to initiate their solving. At the same time, local web communities have emerged and are now widely spread due to social media. Within the framework of the research, it was suggested that the number and concentration of appeals on problems of the urban environment in individual local areas could be directly related to the existence of active web communities of residents in these territories. To test this hypothesis, appeals sent by residents of St. Petersburg for 2 years were analyzed. As a result, zones of high and low civic activity were identified, and local communities existing within the boundaries of these zones were studied. The hypothesis regarding the connection between the existence of local web communities in a certain urban area and civic activity was confirmed. At the same time, no clear correlation was identified between the headcount of local web communities and the number of appeals sent by residents of the territories to which these local communities belong. Further studies using alternative sources of appeals and new territories as examples will make it possible to supplement the existing data and to obtain a more accurate assessment of the relationship of the described factors.

Keywords

Electronic participation Electronic appeal Local web community Civil society Civic activity Urban environment quality 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This research is financially supported by The Russian Science Foundation, Agreement #17-71-30029 with co-financing of Bank Saint Petersburg.

References

  1. 1.
    Social media use jumps in Q1 despite privacy fears. http://wearesocial.com/blog/2018/04/social-media-use-jumps-in-q1-despite-privacy-fears. Accessed 10 May 2018
  2. 2.
    Tsatsou, P.: Why Internet use? A quantitative examination of the role of everyday life and Internet policy and regulation. Technol. Soc. 33(1), 73–83 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Haythornthwaite, C.: Introduction: The Internet in everyday life. Am. Behav. Sci. 45(3), 363–382 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kilpeläinen, A., Seppänen, M.: Information technology and everyday life in ageing rural villages. J. Rural Stud. 33, 1–8 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nam, T., Pardo, T.A.: Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. In: Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times, pp. 282–291. ACM, USA (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schaffers, H., Komninos, N., Pallot, M., Trousse, B., Nilsson, M., Oliveira, A.: Smart cities and the future internet: towards cooperation frameworks for open innovation. In: Domingue, J., et al. (eds.) FIA 2011. LNCS, vol. 6656, pp. 431–446. Springer, Heidelberg (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20898-0_31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dirks, S., Gurdgiev, C., Keeling, M.: Smarter cities for smarter growth: How cities can optimize their systems for the talent-based economy. IBM Global Services, USA (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bakıcı, T., Almirall, E., Wareham, J.: A smart city initiative: the case of Barcelona. J. Knowl. Econ. 4(2), 135–148 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Linders, D.: From e-government to we-government: defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Gov. Inf. Q. 29(4), 446–454 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bertot, J.C., Jaeger, P.T., Hansen, D.: The impact of polices on government social media usage: issues, challenges, and recommendations. Gov. Inf. Q. 29(1), 30–40 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Beaudoin, C.E., Thorson, E.: Social capital in rural and urban communities: testing differences in media effects and models. J. Mass Commun. Q. 81(2), 378–399 (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Serageldin, I., Grootaert, C.: Defining social capital: an integrating view. In: Social Capital: A Multifaceted Perspective, vol. 1, pp. 203–218 (2000)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gladarev, B., Lonkila, M.: The role of social networking sites in civic activism in Russia and Finland. Eur.-Asia Stud. 64(8), 1375–1394 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Williamson, W., Ruming, K.: Using social network analysis to visualize the social-media networks of community groups: two case studies from Sydney. J. Urban Technol. 23(3), 69–89 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lindner, R., Riehm, U.: Electronic petitions and institutional modernization. International parliamentary e-petition systems in comparative perspective. JeDEM - eJournal eDemocracy Open Gov. 1(1), 1–11 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    King, S.F., Brown, P.: Fix my street or else. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance - ICEGOV 2007, pp. 72–80. ACM Press, USA (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mergel, I.A.: Distributed democracy: SeeClickFix.Com for Crowdsourced issue reporting. SSRN Electron. J. (2012).  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1992968
  18. 18.
    Koganuramath, M.M., Angadi, M.: Print media vs internet media. Nagpur University, India (1999)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Koesel, K.J., Bunce, V.J.: Putin, popular protests, and political trajectories in Russia: a comparative perspective. Post-Sov. Aff. 28(4), 403–423 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Petrov, N., Lipman, M., Hale, H.E.: Three dilemmas of hybrid regime governance: Russia from Putin to Putin. Post-Sov. Aff. 30(1), 1–26 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Robertson, G.: Russian protesters: not optimistic but here to stay. Russ. Anal. Digest 115, 2–7 (2012)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Alexanyan, K., et al.: Exploring Russian Cyberspace: Digitally-Mediated Collective Action and the Networked Public Sphere, 2012-2, 3. Berkman Center Research Publication (2012)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Caragliu, A., et al.: Smart cities in Europe. In: 3rd Central European Conference in Regional Science, pp. 45–59. VU University Amsterdam (2009)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    About the order of consideration of appeals of citizens of the Russian Federation (in Russian). http://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?docbody=&firstDoc=1&lastDoc=1&nd=102106413. Accessed 03 May 2018
  25. 25.
    About the approval of the state program of the Russian Federation “Information society” (2011–2020) (in Russian). http://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?docbody=&nd=102349623&rdk=&backlink=1. Accessed 03 May 2018
  26. 26.
    Sokolov, A., Verevkin, A.: Digitalization and evolution of civic engagement: new ways of participation in public policy. In: Chugunov, A.V., Bolgov, R., Kabanov, Y., Kampis, G., Wimmer, M. (eds.) DTGS 2016. CCIS, vol. 674, pp. 269–274. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49700-6_25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Papageorgiou, T.: Crawling Facebook, a social network analysis. Master thesis (2011)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nie, N.H., et al.: Internet and society. a preliminary report. Society 1(1), 275–283 (2002)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    McLuhan, M.: The Gutenberg galaxy: the making of typographic man, p. 293. University of Toronto Press (1962)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hampton, K., Wellman, B.: Neighboring in Netville: How the Internet supports community and social capital in a wired suburb. City Community 2(4), 277–311 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hampton, K.: Place-based and IT Mediated ‘Community”. Plan. Theory Pract. 3(2), 228–231 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Population of St. Petersburg as of January 1, 2017 (In Russian). Web document. http://petrostat.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_ts/petrostat/resources/4e67d90040bd4afc874f87a3e1dde74c/CПб+чиcл+нa+01.01.2017+пo+MO.pdf. Accessed 03 May 2018
  33. 33.
    Electronic reception – Administration of St. Petersburg (in Russian). http://gov.spb.ru/gov/elektronnaya-priemnaya-pre/. Accessed 03 May 2018
  34. 34.
    Beautiful Petersburg (in Russian). http://кpacивыйпeтepбypг.pф/. Accessed 03 May 2018Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    The Portal “Our St. Petersburg” (in Russian). http://gorod.gov.spb.ru/. Accessed 03 May 2018
  36. 36.
    Alexa.com: Vk.com Traffic, Demographics and Competitors. http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/vk.com. Accessed 26 May 2017
  37. 37.
    Top social networks in Russia: latest trends, winter 2015–2016. http://www.russiansearchtips.com/2016/03/top-social-networks-in-russia-latest-trends-in-winter-2015-2016/. Accessed 26 May 2017
  38. 38.
    The distribution of authors in social networks in the Russian region (in Russian). https://br-analytics.ru/statistics/am?hub_id=3&date=201704&period_type=month. Accessed 26 May 2017
  39. 39.
    Gjoka, M., et al.: Practical recommendations on crawling online social networks. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 29(9), 1872–1892 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Environment for people (in Russian). https://sredaforpeople.ru/. Accessed 03 May 2018
  41. 41.
    Gehl, J.: Cities for People, p. 269. Island Press, Washington, D.C. (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sergei Kudinov
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ekaterina Ilina
    • 1
  • Ekaterina Grekhneva
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Design and Urban StudiesITMO UniversitySaint PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations