Advertisement

Evaluation of an eParticipation Project Against eParticipation Success Factors

  • Hans-Dieter ZimmermannEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 947)

Abstract

(e)Participation, as a characteristic of open government, is gaining more and more public attention recently. Therefore, it is important to be able to evaluate eParticipation projects against a sound framework to look into the projects’ impact on society. As several evaluation frameworks focus on quantitative measures only, such as cost-benefit analyses, only a very few provide qualitative measurements. In this paper, we evaluate a concrete eParticipation project from Switzerland, which has not been systematically evaluated before. As an evaluation framework, a list of 23 success factors, which has been developed based on extensive research, has been applied. The results are twofold: first, the evaluation process triggered a systematic ex-post reflection of the project; second, it was discerned that the used framework is highly useful and applicable for the evaluation of eParticipation projects; some suggestions for the further development of the framework are being discussed as well. Both results contribute to the body of knowledge in the area of eParticipation in general.

Keywords

eParticipation Success factors Evaluation 

References

  1. Arnold, R., Girardet, L., Zimmermann, H.-D.: JugendMachtPolitik/Innovative Formen der Partizipation mit neuen Medien von Kindern und Jugendlichen auf Gemeindeebene, Grabs/St. Gallen (2017). http://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.28369.53604/1
  2. Arnstein, S.R.: A ladder of citizen participation. J. Am. Inst. Planners 35(4), 216–224 (1969).  https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carron-Arthur, B., Cunningham, J.A., Griffiths, K.M.: Describing the distribution of engagement in an Internet support group by post frequency: a comparison of the 90-9-1 Principle and Zipf’s Law. Internet Interv. 1(4), 165–168 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INVENT.2014.09.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Macintosh, A., Whyte, A.: Towards an evaluation framework for eParticipation. Transforming Gov.: People, Process Policy 2(1), 16–30 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1108/17506160810862928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Panopoulou, E., Tambouris, E., Tarabanis, K.: Success factors in designing eParticipation initiatives. Inf. Org. 24(4), 195–213 (2014). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S147177271400027XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Rexhepi, A., Filiposka, S., Trajkovik, V.: Youth e-participation as a pillar of sustainable societies. J. Clean. Prod. 174, 114–122 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2017.10.327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Teran, L., Drobnjak, A.: An evaluation framework for eParticipation: the VAAs case study. Int. J. Soc., Hum. Sci. Eng. 7(73) (2013). https://waset.org/publications/5553/an-evaluation-framework-for-participation-the-vaas-case-study
  8. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA): Measuring and Evaluating e-Participation (METEP): Assessment of Readiness at the Country Level (2013). http://workspace.unpan.org/sites/Internet/Documents/METEPframework_18Jul_MOSTLATESTVersion.pdf
  9. von Lucke, J., Herzberg, J., Kluge, U., vom Brocke, J., Müller, O., Zimmermann, H.-D.: Open Societal Innovation – The Alemannic Definition (2012). https://esocietybodensee2020.wordpress.com/publikationen/open-societal-innovation-the-alemannic-definition/
  10. Zimmermann, H.-D.: Youth e-participation: lessons learned from an ongoing project in Switzerland. In: Versendaal, J., Kittl, C., Pucihar, A., Mirjana, K.B. (eds.) Proceedings of the 29th Bled eConference, Bled, pp. 588–596 (2016). http://aisel.aisnet.org/bled2016/5

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.FHS St. Gallen University of Applied SciencesSt. GallenSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations