Potential for Improving Public Services by Exploring Citizens’ Communication to Public Organizations
While the purpose of public organizations is to serve citizens, the citizens themselves are not always consulted in order to develop better public services. We argue that the direct communication from citizens to public organizations contains a wealth of information on how the organizations could improve their services, and this information is worth exploring. In order to prove our argument, we have interviewed 19 public organizations in Rwanda and Sri Lanka, identified 26 issues raised by the citizens, and mapped these issues into four solution domains: availability and timeliness of information, policy development, business process development, availability and design of e-services.
KeywordsCitizen-centered E-government Participatory governance Bottom-up policy making Co-creation of public services
The authors would like to express their gratitude to the people in Rwanda and Sri Lanka who made this research possible. Thanks a lot to Sri Lanka Institute of Development Administration, without you we would never reach those 12 organizations.
- 2.Nambisan, S., Nambisan, P.: Engaging Citizens in Co-creation in Public Services: Lessons Learned and Best Practices. IBM Center for the Business of Government (2013)Google Scholar
- 4.Scherer, S., Wimmer, M.A., Strykowski, S.: Social government: a concept supporting communities in co-creation and co-production of public services. In: Proceedings of the 16th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, pp. 204–209. ACM, New York, USA (2015)Google Scholar
- 6.Sneiders, E., Byungura, J.C., Henkel, M., Perjons, E.: Potential of language technology to support public organizations and their communication channels in a developing country. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, pp. 236–244. ACM, New York, USA (2017)Google Scholar
- 7.Ruthven, I., Kelly, D. (eds.): Interactive Information Seeking, Behavior and Retrieval. Facet Publishing, London (2011)Google Scholar
- 11.Seckler, M., Heinz, S., Bargas-Avila, J.A., Opwis, K., Tuch, A.N.: Designing usable web forms: empirical evaluation of web form improvement guidelines. In: Proceedings of CHI 2014, pp. 1275–1284. ACM, New York, USA (2014)Google Scholar
- 12.Pappel, I., Pappel, I., Saarmann M.: Digital records keeping to information governance in Estonian local governments. In: Proceedings of i-Society 2012, pp. 199–204. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
- 14.Scholl, H.J.: Interoperability in e-Government: more than just smart middleware. In: Proceedings of HICSS 2005, pp. 123–123. IEEE (2005)Google Scholar
- 16.Skelcher, C.: Public-private partnerships, pp. 347–370. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)Google Scholar
- 20.Meik, J., Brock, C., Blut, M.: Complaining customers as innovation contributors: stimulating service innovation through multichannel complaint management. In: Proceedings of SRII Global Conference 2014, pp. 125–132. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
- 21.CIA: The World Factbook. Sri Lanka. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ce.html. Accessed 02 May 2018
- 22.Fields, G.S.: Working Hard, Working Poor: A Global Journey. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012)Google Scholar
- 24.Charalabidis, Y., Triantafillou, A., Karkaletsis, V., Loukis, E.: Public policy formulation through non moderated crowdsourcing in social media. In: Tambouris, E., Macintosh, A., Sæbø, Ø. (eds.) ePart 2012. LNCS, vol. 7444, pp. 156–169. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33250-0_14CrossRefGoogle Scholar