Advertisement

Analysing Strategic Misalignment in Public Administration

  • Dóra ŐriEmail author
  • Zoltán Szabó
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 947)

Abstract

Problems concerning strategic alignment can manifest in several aspects and perspectives of an organisation. This paper presents public administration-specific organisational misalignment problems and propose a method for detecting the symptoms of the misaligned state in enterprise architecture models. The analysis follows the concept of strategic alignment perspectives, collecting typical misalignment symptoms and detection prospects along the four traditional strategic alignment perspectives. A case study in a public organisation demonstrates the usability of the proposed EAM-based misalignment assessment framework.

Keywords

Strategic alignment Enterprise architecture management Misalignment Modeling Alignment perspectives 

Notes

Acknowledgement

Open image in new window Supported by the ÚNKP-17-4 New National Excellence Program of the Ministry of Human Capacities.

References

  1. 1.
    Carvalho, G., Sousa, P.: Business and Information Systems MisAlignment Model (BISMAM): an holistic model leveraged on misalignment and medical sciences approaches. In: Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Business/IT Alignment and Interoperability (BUSITAL 2008). CEUR, vol. 336, CEUR-WS, Aachen, pp. 104–119 (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chan, Y.E., Reich, B.H.: State of the Art. IT alignment: what have we learned? J. Inf. Technol. 22(4), 297–315 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen, H.M., Kazman, R., Garg, A.: BITAM: an engineering-principled method for managing misalignments between business and IT architectures. Sci. Comput. Program. 57(1), 5–26 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Henderson, J.C., Venkatraman, N.: Strategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Syst. J. 32(1), 4–16 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Enagi, M.A., Ochoche, A.: The role of enterprise architecture in aligning business and information technology in organisations: Nigerian government investment on information technology. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 3(1), 59–65 (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fritscher, B., Pigneur, Y.: Business IT alignment from business model to enterprise architecture. In: Salinesi, C., Pastor, O. (eds.) CAiSE 2011. LNBIP, vol. 83, pp. 4–15. Springer, Heidelberg (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22056-2_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Luftman, J.: Competing in the Information Age: Align in the Sand. Oxford University Press, London (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Őri, D.: On exposing strategic and structural mismatches between business and information systems: Misalignment symptom detection based on enterprise architecture model analysis, Ph.D. thesis, May 2017Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pereira, C.M., Sousa, P.: Business and information systems alignment: understanding the key issues. In: Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Information Technology Evaluation, pp. 341–348 (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pereira, C.M., Sousa, P.: Enterprise architecture: business and IT alignment. In: ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 1344–1345. ACM, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Saat, J., Franke, U., Lagerström, R., Ekstedt, M.: Enterprise architecture meta models for IT/business alignment situations. In: 14th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, pp. 14–23. IEEE Press, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Strong, D.M., Volkoff, O.: Understanding organization-enterprise system fit: a path to theorizing the information technology artifact. MIS Q. 34(4), 731–756 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sunkle, S., Kulkarni, V., Roychoudhury, S.: Analyzing enterprise models using enterprise architecture-based ontology. In: Moreira, A., Schätz, B., Gray, J., Vallecillo, A., Clarke, P. (eds.) MODELS 2013. LNCS, vol. 8107, pp. 622–638. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41533-3_38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    TOG: The Open Group: TOGAF Version 9. The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF) (2015). http://theopengroup.org/. Accessed 21 Jan 2015
  15. 15.
    van der Linden, D.J.T., Hoppenbrouwers, S.J.B.A., Lartseva, A., Proper, H.A.(Erik): Towards an investigation of the conceptual landscape of enterprise architecture. In: Halpin, T., Nurcan, S., Krogstie, J., Soffer, P., Proper, E., Schmidt, R., Bider, I. (eds.) BPMDS/EMMSAD -2011. LNBIP, vol. 81, pp. 526–535. Springer, Heidelberg (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21759-3_38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    vom Brocke, J., Braccini, A.M., Sonnenberg, C., Spagnoletti, P.: Living IT infrastructures—an ontology-based approach to aligning IT infrastructure capacity and business needs. Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst. 15(3), 246–274 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wagter, R., Proper, H.A.(Erik), Witte, D.: A practice-based framework for enterprise coherence. In: Proper, E., Gaaloul, K., Harmsen, F., Wrycza, S. (eds.) PRET 2012. LNBIP, vol. 120, pp. 77–95. Springer, Heidelberg (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31134-5_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zachman, J.A.: A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Syst. J. 26(3), 276–292 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zarvic, N., Wieringa, R.: An integrated enterprise architecture framework for business-IT alignment. White Paper (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information SystemsCorvinus University of BudapestBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations