Advertisement

Mining and Indexing of Legal Natural Language Texts with Domain and Task Ontology

  • Galina Kurcheeva
  • Marina Rakhvalova
  • Daria Rakhvalova
  • Maxim BakaevEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 947)

Abstract

Today’s legislation lags behind the needs and practices of the Internet, electronic governance and digital economy in general. It is widely believed that enhancement of the legal system with IT to facilitate law-making and law enforcement can contribute to improvement of business and social environment, as well as people’s quality of life. Our paper is a study of foundations and means for building Legal Knowledge-Based Systems and transition to the so-called computational law. Particularly, we outline the application of legal and regulatory documents indexing technologies for legal language processing (LLP) and construct domain ontology for real estate legislation. The implementation of the approach may decrease the number of errors, over-complexities and ambiguities in legal texts, allow automated search for relevant documents, and categorize complicated legal relations. These should save the practitioners from spending too much time on routine tasks, simplify decision-making in law enforcement and reduce the subjectivity, and ultimately contribute to creating uniform and consistent legislation.

Keywords

Computational law Indexing Document similarity Full-text search Law enforcement Text analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The reported study was funded by RFBR according to the research project No. 17-32-01087 a2 OGN.

References

  1. 1.
    Decree of the President of the Russian Federation dated 01.12.2016 № 642 “on the Strategy of scientific and technological development of the Russian Federation”. 05.12.2016. No. 49. St. 6887Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kalina, V.F.: Legal Technique: Textbook for Applied Bachelor, 291 p. Yurayt Publishing House, Moscow (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Andrichenko, L.V.: Legal mechanisms of social and cultural adaptation and integration of migrants in the Russian Federation. J. Russ. Law 10, 5–18 (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vlasenko, N.A., Zaloilo, M.V.: Development of legal science school. J. Russ. Law 9, 24–35 (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rueva, E.O.: Violation of the principle of fairness in the result of imperfections of the legal machinery of the criminal law. Russian investigator, No. 4, pp. 42–46 (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Popple, J.: A Pragmatic Legal Expert System. – (Applied Legal Philosophy), pp. 24–25. Aldershot, Dartmouth (1996)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Griffo, C., Almeida, J.P.A., Guizzardi, G.: A systematic mapping of the literature on legal core ontologies. In: ONTOBRAS (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Breuker, J., Valente, A., Winkels, R.: Use and reuse of legal ontologies in knowledge engineering and information management. In: Benjamins, V.R., Casanovas, P., Breuker, J., Gangemi, A. (eds.) Law and the Semantic Web. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3369, pp. 36–64. Springer, Heidelberg (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32253-5_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Capuano, N., De Maio, C., Salerno, S., Toti, D.: A methodology based on commonsense knowledge and ontologies for the automatic classification of legal cases. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics (WIMS 2014), p. 27. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Boella, G., Di Caro, L., Humphreys, L., Robaldo, L., Rossi, P., van der Torre, L.: Eunomos, a legal document and knowledge management system for the web to provide relevant, reliable and up-to-date information on the law. Artif. Intell. Law 24(3), 245–283 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Molnár, B., Béleczki, A., Benczúr, A.: Application of legal ontologies based approaches for procedural side of public administration. In: Kő, A., Francesconi, E. (eds.) EGOVIS 2016. LNCS, vol. 9831, pp. 135–149. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44159-7_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gangemi, A., Sagri, M.-T., Tiscornia, D.: A constructive framework for legal ontologies. In: Benjamins, V.R., Casanovas, P., Breuker, J., Gangemi, A. (eds.) Law and the Semantic Web. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3369, pp. 97–124. Springer, Heidelberg (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32253-5_7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kurcheeva, G.I.: Comprehensive approach to smart urban development based on Big Data application. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series: International Conference Information Technologies in Business and Industry, Tomsk, vol. 10015 (2018)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Decree of the President of the Russian Federation dated 20.05.2011 № 657 “on monitoring of law enforcement in the Russian Federation”. Rossiyskaya Gazeta, № 110 (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Alekseeva, M.V.: On the issue of the relevance of the Institute of legal monitoring for the constitutional law of the Russian Federation. Russian justice, No. 11, pp. 47–49 (2017)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Polukarov, A.V.: Administrative-legal regulation of anti-corruption monitoring in the social sector. Modern law, No. 2, pp. 28–35 (2017)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Khabrieva, T.Y., Lazarev, V.V., Gabov, A.V. et al. (eds.): Judicial practice in the modern legal system of Russia: monograph. Institute of legislation and comparative law under the Government of the Russian Federation, NORMA, INFRA-M, 432 p. (2017)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Klimov, A.A.: Activities of courts of General jurisdiction to identify gaps in criminal procedure law. Russian judge, No. 9, pp. 32–35 (2017)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sharnina, L.A.: The problems of establishing gaps in the constitutional law. Constitutional and municipal law, No. 1, pp. 17–21 (2018)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Morozova, L.A.: Problems of typology of legal collisions (modern interpretation). Lex russica, No. 6, pp. 32–38 (2017)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Reutov, V.P.: Consistency of terminology as a manifestation of the culture of the language of the law. In: Akinfieva, V.V., Anan’eva, A.A., Afanasieva, S.I., et al. (eds.) Perm the Sixth Congress of legal scholars (Perm, 16–17 October 2015): Selected Materials, pp. 265–269. Statute, Moscow (2016)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Raw, V.M.: Law-Making in Russia. Theory and practice: collection of scientific articles Problems. In: Syry, V.M., Zanina, M.A. (eds.) Materials of Scientific-Practical Conference, № 3, pp. 147–148. Russian Academy of justice, Moscow (2010)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Berg, L.N.: Law enforcement activity in the aspect of system research. Russ. Law J. 1, 56 (2011)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Federal law of 17.07.2009 № 172-FZ “on anti-corruption expertise of normative legal acts and draft normative legal acts”. Rossiyskaya Gazeta, No. 133, 22 July 2009Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation of 26.02.2010 № 96 “on anti-corruption expertise of normative legal acts and draft normative legal acts”. Rossiyskaya Gazeta, No. 46, 05 March 2010Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Astanin, V.V.: Anti-corruption expertise in doctrine and practice. Russian justice, No. 8, pp. 5–9 (2016)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Alexeeva, L.G.: Anti-corruption expertise of normative legal acts. Legality, No. 9, pp. 14–16 (2017)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bakaev, M., Avdeenko, T.: Indexing and comparison of multi-dimensional entities in a recommender system based on ontological approach. Computación y Sistemas 17(1), 5–13 (2013)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hoekstra, R., Breuker, J., Di Bello, M., Boer, A.: The LKIF core ontology of basic legal concepts. LOAIT 321, 43–63 (2007)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    World Wide Web Consortium (W3C): OWL web ontology language current status. https://www.w3.org/standards/techs/owl#w3c_all. Accessed 10 June 2018
  31. 31.
    Antoniou, G., van Harmelen, F.: Web ontology language: OWL. In: Staab, S., Studer, R. (eds.) Handbook on Ontologies. International Handbooks on Information Systems. Springer, Heidelberg (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24750-0_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Astrova, I., Korda, N., Kalja, A.: Storing OWL ontologies in SQL relational databases. Int. J. Electr. Comput. Syst. Eng. 1(4), 242–247 (2007)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Universal Declaration of human rights. Adopted at the third session of the UN General Assembly resolution a (III) of 10.12.1948. Rossiyskaya Gazeta, 10 December 1998Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Haldeev, A.V.: On the concept of “housing” in the practice of the European court of human rights. Housing right, № 5, 6, 7 (2007)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Housing code of the Russian Federation of 29.12.2004 N 188-FZ. Rossiyskaya Gazeta, No. 1, 12 January 2005Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kondrashov, I., et al.: LegalTech and lawyers of the future. The Law, N 11, pp. 20–36 (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Novosibirsk State Technical UniversityNovosibirskRussia
  2. 2.Siberian Transport UniversityNovosibirskRussia

Personalised recommendations