Advertisement

Preoperative Imaging in Patients Undergoing Cholecystectomy

  • Sofiane El Djouzi
Chapter

Abstract

Cholecystectomy is one of the most commonly performed operations worldwide. Gallstone pathology with its different variants remains the most common underlying etiology leading to such surgery. With a continuous commitment to lessening the perioperative complications from laparoscopic cholecystectomy, experts have committed to the improvement of the perioperative care from every aspect. The accuracy of preoperative diagnosis has proven to play a vital role, hence, the role of imaging studies in delineating the underlying anatomy and the severity of the biliary pathology. Imaging modalities have evolved over the past years, and such technology has played a vital role in the precision of the preoperative diagnosis. Knowing in advance what would be encountered during the surgery would prepare surgeons to conduct a safer operation. Furthermore, knowing in advance about anatomical variation could prove to be of critical importance for surgery and consequently for patient safety.

Keywords

Acute cholecystitis Gallstones Cholecystectomy Ultrasound CT scan MRCP HIDA scan 

References

  1. 1.
    European Society of R. The future role of radiology in healthcare. Insights Imag. 2010;1(1):2–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rego J, Tan K. Advances in imaging-the changing environment for the imaging specialist. Perm J. 2006;10(1):26–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brady A, Laoide RO, McCarthy P, McDermott R. Discrepancy and error in radiology: concepts, causes and consequences. Ulst Med J. 2012;81(1):3–9.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Scatliff JH, Morris PJ. From roentgen to magnetic resonance imaging: the history of medical imaging. N C Med J. 2014;75(2):111–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lebit DF, Vladareanu PD. The role of 4D ultrasound in the assessment of fetal behaviour. Maedica (Buchar). 2011;6(2):120–7.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sharma RK, Sonkar K, Sinha N, Rebala P, Albani AE, Behari A, et al. Gallstones: a worldwide multifaceted disease and its correlations with gallbladder carcinoma. PLoS One. 2016;11(11):e0166351.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stinton LM, Shaffer EA. Epidemiology of gallbladder disease: cholelithiasis and cancer. Gut Liver. 2012;6(2):172–87.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    European Association for the Study of the Liver. Electronic address eee. EASL clinical practice guidelines on the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of gallstones. J Hepatol. 2016;65(1):146–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Warttig S, Ward S, Rogers G, Guideline Development G. Diagnosis and management of gallstone disease: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ. 2014;349:g6241.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ansaloni L, Pisano M, Coccolini F, Peitzmann AB, Fingerhut A, Catena F, et al. WSES guidelines on acute calculous cholecystitis. World J Emerg Surg. 2016. 2016;11:25.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ihnatsenka B, Boezaart AP. Ultrasound: basic understanding and learning the language. Int J Should Surg. 2010;4(3):55–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Badea R, Zaro R, Opincariu I, Chiorean L. Ultrasound in the examination of the gallbladder – a holistic approach: grey scale, Doppler, CEUS, elastography, and 3D. Med Ultrason. 2014;16(4):345–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pinto A, Reginelli A, Cagini L, Coppolino F, Stabile Ianora AA, Bracale R, et al. Accuracy of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of acute calculous cholecystitis: review of the literature. Crit Ultrasound J. 2013;5(Suppl 1):S11.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hwang H, Marsh I, Doyle J. Does ultrasonography accurately diagnose acute cholecystitis? Improving diagnostic accuracy based on a review at a regional hospital. Can J Surg. 2014;57(3):162–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Badea R, Zaro R, Tantau M, Chiorean L. Ultrasonography of the biliary tract – up to date. The importance of correlation between imaging methods and patients’ signs and symptoms. Med Ultrason. 2015;17(3):383–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Khandelwal N, Suri S, Katariya S, Malik N, Das KM, Garg K, et al. Ultrasound in obstructive jaundice. Indian J Gastroenterol. 1990;9(1):51–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cohen SM, Kurtz AB. Biliary sonography. Radiol Clin N Am. 1991;29(6):1171–98.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Neitlich T, Neitlich J. The imaging evaluation of cholelithiasis in the obese patient-ultrasound vs CT cholecystography: our experience with the bariatric surgery population. Obes Surg. 2009;19(2):207–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pelc NJ. Recent and future directions in CT imaging. Ann Biomed Eng. 2014;42(2):260–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Goldman LW. Principles of CT and CT technology. J Nucl Med Technol. 2007;35(3):115–28; quiz 29–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shakespear JS, Shaaban AM, Rezvani M. CT findings of acute cholecystitis and its complications. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194(6):1523–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kim SJ, Choi BI, Kim SH, Lee JY. Three-dimensional imaging for hepatobiliary and pancreatic diseases: emphasis on clinical utility. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2009;19(1):7–15.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Grover VP, Tognarelli JM, Crossey MM, Cox IJ, Taylor-Robinson SD, McPhail MJ. Magnetic resonance imaging: principles and techniques: lessons for clinicians. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2015;5(3):246–55.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Meseeha M, Attia M. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Treasure Island: StatPearls; 2018.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dasari BV, Tan CJ, Gurusamy KS, Martin DJ, Kirk G, McKie L, et al. Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(9):CD003327.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kaltenthaler EC, Walters SJ, Chilcott J, Blakeborough A, Vergel YB, Thomas S. MRCP compared to diagnostic ERCP for diagnosis when biliary obstruction is suspected: a systematic review. BMC Med Imaging. 2006;6:9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bahram M, Gaballa G. The value of pre-operative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in management of patients with gall stones. Int J Surg. 2010;8(5):342–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jendresen MB, Thorboll JE, Adamsen S, Nielsen H, Gronvall S, Hart-Hansen O. Preoperative routine magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography before laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective study. Eur J Surg. 2002;168(12):690–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Dalton SJ, Balupuri S, Guest J. Routine magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and intra-operative cholangiogram in the evaluation of common bile duct stones. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2005;87(6):469–70.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Leerhoy B, Elmunzer BJ. How to avoid post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2018;28(4):439–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Alkhaffaf B, Parkin E, Flook D. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a common and potentially hazardous technique that can be avoided. Arch Surg. 2011;146(3):329–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Adam V, Bhat M, Martel M, da Silveira E, Reinhold C, Valois E, et al. Comparison costs of ERCP and MRCP in patients with suspected biliary obstruction based on a randomized trial. Value Health. 2015;18(6):767–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hoyuela C, Cugat E, Bretcha P, Collera P, Espinos J, Marco C. Must ERCP be routinely performed if choledocholithiasis is suspected? Dig Surg. 1999;16(5):411–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rubin MI, Thosani NC, Tanikella R, Wolf DS, Fallon MB, Lukens FJ. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for suspected choledocholithiasis: testing the current guidelines. Dig Liver Dis. 2013;45(9):744–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Urbach DR, Khajanchee YS, Jobe BA, Standage BA, Hansen PD, Swanstrom LL. Cost-effective management of common bile duct stones: a decision analysis of the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), intraoperative cholangiography, and laparoscopic bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc. 2001;15(1):4–13.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ofosu A, Ramai D, Sunkara T, Adler DG. The emerging role of non-radiation endoscopic management of biliary tract disorders. Ann Gastroenterol. 2018;31(5):561–5.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Johnson H Jr, Cooper B. The value of HIDA scans in the initial evaluation of patients for cholecystitis. J Natl Med Assoc. 1995;87(1):27–32.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Krishnamurthy S, Krishnamurthy GT. Cholecystokinin and morphine pharmacological intervention during 99mTc-HIDA cholescintigraphy: a rational approach. Semin Nucl Med. 1996;26(1):16–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sofiane El Djouzi
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of GI/Minimally Invasive SurgeryLoyola University Medical CenterChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations