Advertisement

Introducing Corporate Water Stewardship in the Context of Global Water Governance

  • Thérèse Rudebeck
Chapter
Part of the Water Governance - Concepts, Methods, and Practice book series (WGCMP)

Abstract

Water has become a material business risk. Using this fact as a springboard to leap into a discussion around corporate water engagement, this introductory chapter sets out the basic ideas around Corporate Water Stewardship: A term embodying a range of different actions taken by corporate water users to mitigate water risks and enhance collective water security. The chapter places these activities in the broader context of a global water governance regime and suggests that despite a rapid proliferation of corporate interest in water issues, corporate water stewardship has received limited scholarly attention. As a result, the effects of corporate activities and decisions are, as yet, insufficiently understood. This chapter sets out the objective of the book to address this gap by providing an in-depth empirical and conceptual analysis of why companies engage with water issues, how they engage, and the effect their actions have on the norms and practices promoted by the global water governance system. Using these three questions to structure the book in its three parts – Incorporation, Involvement, and Influence – the final part of this introductory chapter provides an overview of the book’s methodological approach, and the subsequent chapters.

References

  1. Allan, J. A. (1998). Virtual water: A strategic resource –global solutions to regional deficits. Ground Water, 36(4), 545–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allan, J. A. (2011). Virtual water: Tackling the threat to our planet’s most precious resource. New York: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  3. Avant, D. D., Finnemore, M., & Sell, S. K. (2010). Who governs the globe? In D. D. Avant, M. Finnemore, & S. K. Sell (Eds.), Who governs the globe? Cambridge studies in International relations (pp. 1–31). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. AWS. (2018). About. [Online]. Available at http://a4ws.org/about/. Accessed 2018-10-21.
  5. Bakker, K. (2014). The business of water: Market environmentalism in the water sector. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 39, 469–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barnett, M., & Duvall, R. (2005). Power in global governance. In M. Barnett & R. Duvall (Eds.), Power in global governance (pp. 1–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bexell, M. (2014). Global governance, legitimacy and (de)legitimation. Globalizations, 11(3), 289–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Biermann, F., & Pattberg, P. (2008). Global environmental governance: Taking stock, moving forward. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 33, 277–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Biermann, F., Pattberg, P., Asselt, H., & Zelli, F. (2009). The fragmentation of global governance architectures: A framework for analysis. Global Environmental Politics, 9(4), 14–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blowfield, M. (2008). Poverty’s case for business: The evidence, misconceptions, conceits and deceit surrounding the business case. BDS working paper series no. 5. The Business, Development and Society Network, Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  11. Bodansky, D. (1999). The legitimacy of international governance: A coming challenge for international environmental law? The American Journal of International Law, 93(3), 596–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bodin, Ö., Ramirez-Sanchez, S., Ernston, H., & Prell, C. (2011). A social relational approach to natural resource governance. In Ö. Bodin & C. Prell (Eds.), Social networks and natural resource management: Uncovering the social fabric of environmental governance (pp. 3–28). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Börzel, T. A., & Risse, T. (2005). Public-private partnerships. Effective and legitimate tools of transnational governance? In E. Grande & L. W. Pauly (Eds.), Complex sovereignty: Reconstituting political authority in the twenty first century (pp. 195–216). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  14. Bulkeley, H. (2005). Reconfiguring environmental governance: Towards a politics of scales and networks. Political Geography, 24(8), 875–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Campbell, L. M., Corson, C., Gray, N. J., MacDonald, K. I., & Brosius, J. P. (2014). Studying global environmental meetings to understand global environmental governance: Collaborative event ethnography at the tenth conference of the parties to the convention on biological diversity. Global Environmental Politics, 14(3), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carrozza, C. (2015). Democratizing expertise and environmental governance: Different approaches to the politics of science and their relevance for policy analysis. Environmental Policy and Planning, 17(1), 108–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Castro, J. E. (2007). Water governance in the twentieth-first century. Ambiente & Sociedale, X(2), 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. CEO Water Mandate, WWF & WaterAid. (2015). Serving the public interest: Corporate water stewardship and sustainable development. Oakland: UNCG, Pacific Institute.Google Scholar
  19. Cienki, A., & Yanow, D. (2013). Why metaphor and other tropes? Linguistic approaches to analysing policies and the political. Journal of International Relations and Development, 16(2), 167–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Coca-Cola Company. (2013). Beyond water: Coca-Cola expands partnership with WWF. Announces Ambitious Environmental Goals. [Online]. Available at http://www.coca-colacompany.com/stories/beyond-water-coca-cola-expands-partnership-with-wwf-announces-ambitious-environmental-goals. Accessed 2017-06-03.
  21. Cooley, H., Ajami, N., Ha, M.-L., Srinivasan, V., Morrison, J., Donnelly, K., & Christian-Smith, J. (2014). Global water governance in the twenty-first century. In P. H. Gleick (Ed.), The World’s water volume 8: The biennial report on freshwater resources (pp. 1–18). Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar
  22. Daniel, M. A., & Sojamo, S. (2012). From risks to shared value? Corporate strategies in building a global water accounting and disclosure regime. Water Alternatives, 5(3), 636–657.Google Scholar
  23. Delmas, M. A., & Young, O. R. (2009). Introduction: New perspectives on governance for sustainable development. In M. A. Delmas & O. R. Young (Eds.), Governance for the environment: New perspectives (pp. 3–11). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Diageo. (2017). Diageo announces its five year international partnership with WaterAid. [Online]. Available at https://www.diageo.com/en-us/ourbrands/infocus/Pages/diageo-announces-its-five-year-international-partnership-with-WaterAid.aspx. Accessed 2017-06-03.
  25. Dryzek, J. S. (2013). The politics of the earth (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press: Oxford.Google Scholar
  26. European Commission. (2019). What is an SME? [online] Available at. http://ec.europa.eu/growth/smes/businessfriendly-environment/sme-definition_en. Accessed 26 Feb 2019.
  27. Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gawel, E., & Bernsen, K. (2011). Globalization of water: The case for global water governance? Nature and Culture, 6(3), 205–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Grundmann, R. (2009). The role of expertise in governance processes. Forest Policy and Economics, 11(5–6), 398–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gupta, J., & Pahl-Wostl, C. (2013). Global water governance in the context of global and multilevel governance: Its need, form, and challenges. Ecology and Society, 18(4), 53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. H&M. (2015). Responsible water use for sustainable fashion. Stockholm: H&M.Google Scholar
  32. Haas, P. M. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hajer, M. (2003). Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void. Policy Sciences, 36, 175–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hajer, M., & Versteeg, W. (2005). Performing governance through networks. European Political Sciences, 3, 340–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hoekstra, A. Y. (2011). The global dimension of water governance: Why the River Basin approach is no longer sufficient and why cooperative action at global level is needed. Water, 3(1), 21–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hoff, H. (2009). Global water resources and their management. Current Opinion in Environment Sustainability, 1(2), 141–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jessop, B. (2000). The dynamics of partnership and governance failure. In G. Stoker (Ed.), The new politics of local governance in Britain (pp. 11–32). Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  38. Karkkainen, B. C. (2004). Post-sovereign environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics, 4(1), 72–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lall, U., Boccaletti, G., & Lamb, C. (2015). Discussion panel: “The investment perspective.” The new bottom line: Collaborative solutions for growth, FT Water Summit 2015, October 27th, London. [Online]. Available at https://live.ft.com/Events/2015/FT-Water-Summit. Accessed 2016-01-21.
  40. Levy, D., & Prakash, A. (2003). Bargains old and new: Multinational corporations in global governance. Business and Politics, 5(2), 131–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Molle, F. (2008). Nirvana concepts, narratives and policy models: Insights from the water sector. Water Alternatives, 1(1), 131–156.Google Scholar
  42. Mollinga, P. P. (2008). Water, politics and development: Framing a political sociology of water resources management. Water Alternatives, 1(1), 7–23.Google Scholar
  43. Morgan, A., & Orr, S. (2015). The value of water: A framework for understanding water valuation, risk and stewardship. [Online]. Available at http://commdev.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/The-Value-of-Water-Discussion-Draft-Final-August-2015.pdf. Accessed 2018-11-21.
  44. Nestlé. (2014). Nestlé Commitment on Water Stewardship, appendix to the Nestlé policy on environmental sustainability. Vevey: Nestlé S.A.Google Scholar
  45. Newborne, P., & Dalton, J. (2016). Water management and stewardship: Taking stock of corporate water behaviour. Gland/London: IUCN/ODI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Osiander, A. (2001). Sovereignty, international relations, and the Westphalian myth. International Organization, 55(2), 251–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Owens, S. (2015). Knowledge, policy, and expertise: The UK Royal Commission on environmental pollution 1970–2011. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pahl-Wostl, C., Gupta, J., & Petry, D. (2008). Governance and the global water system: A theoretical exploration. Global Governance, 14(4), 419–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. PepsiCo. (2014). Delivering access to safe water through partnerships. PepsiCo: Purchase.Google Scholar
  50. Post, J. E. (2000). Moving from geographic to virtual communities: Global corporate citizenship in a Dot.com world. Business and Society Review, 105(1), 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rasche, A., & Gilbert, D. U. (2012). Institutionalizing global governance: The role of the United Nations global compact. Business Ethics: A European Review, 21(1), 100–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Reed, M., & Bruyneel, S. (2010). Rescaling environmental governance, rethinking the state: A three-dimensional review. Progress in Human Geography, 34(5), 646–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies, 44, 652–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Roe, E. (1994). Narrative policy analysis: Theory and practice. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Rosenau, J. N. (1995). Governance in the twenty-first century. Global Governance, 1(1), 13–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rosenau, J. N. (2000, August 1–5). The governance of fragmentation: Neither a World Republic nor a global interstate system. Presentation at Congress of the International Political Science Association, Quebec City.Google Scholar
  57. Rosenau, J. (2003). Distant proximities: Dynamics beyond globalization. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Salman, S. M. A. (2003). From Marrakech through the Hague to Kyoto: Has the global debate on water reached a dead end? International Water Resources Association, 28(4), 491–500.Google Scholar
  59. Scholte, J. A. (2002). Civil society and democracy in global governance. Global Governance, 8(3), 281–304.Google Scholar
  60. UN. (2016). COP22 spotlights water as part of the climate change solution. [Online]. Available at http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/blog/2016/11/cop22-spotlights-water-as-part-of-the-climate-change-solution/. Accessed 2018-12-07.
  61. Varady, R. G., Meehan, K., & McGovern, E. (2009). Charting the emergence of ‘global water initiatives’ in world water governance. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 34(3), 150–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Vos, J., & Hinojosa, L. (2016). Virtual water trade and the contestation of hydrosocial territories. Water International, 41(1), 37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zacher, M. W. (1992). The decaying pillars of the Westphalian temple: Implications for international order and governance. In J. N. Rosenau & E. O. Czempiel (Eds.), Governance without government order and change in world politics (pp. 58–101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thérèse Rudebeck
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Geography & Sustainable DevelopmentUniversity of St AndrewsSt AndrewsUK

Personalised recommendations