Constraints to Agricultural Transformation in Yumbe District, Uganda

  • Nabalegwa Muhamud Wambede
  • Asaba Joyfred
  • Alule Rhombe Jimmy
Part of the Climate Change Management book series (CCM)


This book chapter analysed the constraints to agricultural transformation, focussing on Yumbe district in Uganda. Since the 1980s, many resources have been devoted to agricultural sector by the government and donor community with the aim of transforming it from predominantly subsistence to one where farmers produce for the market. This was expected to take place with increased farmers’ adoption of modern farming technologies. Scientists developed a number of technologies with a hope that once they are introduced to the farmers,they would be readily adopted. This has not been the case. The uptake of the modern technologies has not been impressive. Even where adoption has taken place, it is on a piecemeal basis. Therefore there is a need to examine the factors that have led to the low rate of technology uptake and hence limited agricultural transformation in the country. The data collection methods used in this study included questionnaires, interviews, direct observation and document review. The study covered the social and economic conditions of the farming communities that are hypothesised to be limiting the uptake of technologies that would lead to agricultural modernisation. The study analysed the relationship between the socio-economic factors and adoption to modern farming technologies. The chi-square test was used to establish whether there were significant differences in education level, membership to farmer organisations/farmer groups, family size, etc. between adopters and non-adopters of modern farming technologies and hence agricultural transformation. Multiple regression was used to establish the most important factors influencing agricultural transformation in the area. The findings indicated that the most important factors influencing farmers’ adoption of modern farming technologies and hence agricultural transformation are membership to agricultural organisation and cost of inputs. It can be concluded that the government and other organisations promoting agricultural modernisation should encourage farmers to form groups where they learn modern methods. It should also provide subsidies to farm input so that they are affordable to the farmers.


Agricultural transformation Constraints Socio-economic factors Farming technologies Agricultural modernisation 


  1. Adesina JO, Graham Y, Olukoshi A (2006) Africa and development challenges in the new millennium: the NEPAD debate. CODESRIA, London/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Alamgir M, Arora P (1991) Providing food security for all (IFAD series on rural poverty). ITDG Publishing. ISBN 10: 1853391174 ISBN 13: 9781853391170Google Scholar
  3. Arnon (1981) Modernisation of agriculture in developing countries: resources, potentials and problems. Willey, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Atlas of Uganda (1967) Department of lands surveys, Kampala, UgandaGoogle Scholar
  5. Ayodele T, Eshalomi MO (1998) African case study: palm oil and economic development in Nigeria and Ghana. Lagos. Initiative for Public Policy Analysis (IPPA)Google Scholar
  6. Buyinza M, Naagula A (2009) Predictors of agro-forestry technology adoption and land conservation strategies in the highlands of southwestern Uganda. Online J Earth Sci 3(2):46–55Google Scholar
  7. Buyukcolak U (1978) Transfer of technology: factors influencing small farmers in the adoption of modern agricultural related to high yielding varieties of wheat production in Turkey, Dissertation Abstracts International, A (1979):38Google Scholar
  8. Enger DE, Smith FB (2004) Environmental science: a study of interrelationships, 9th edn. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, BostonGoogle Scholar
  9. Everilt BS (1998) The Cambridge dictionary of statistics. Cambridge University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Feder G, Just RE, Zilberman D (1985, January) Adoption of agricultural innovations in developing countries: a survey. Econ Dev Cult Chang 33(2):255–298. Scholar
  11. Fellmann DJGA (1999) Human geography- landscapes of human activities. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, BostonGoogle Scholar
  12. Fellmann DJ, Getis A, Judith G (1999) Human geography- landscapes of human activities. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, BostonGoogle Scholar
  13. Grove AT (1993) The changing geography of Africa, Second edn. Oxford University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. GoK (1993) Government of Kenya Economic Survey 1993. Kenya National Bureau of Statistics. Nairobi, KenyaGoogle Scholar
  15. Gujarati DN (2003) Basic econometrics, 4th edn. McGraw- Hill Higher Education, Burr Ridge- BostonGoogle Scholar
  16. Khaukha R (1992) An economic analysis of demand and supply of agricultural inputs at farm level. In: Mukama PC (ed) Economic benefit and willingness to pay for improved rangelands in Uganda. Unpub MSC Thesis, Makerere UniversityGoogle Scholar
  17. Lowe RG (1986) Agricultural revolution in Africa. Macmillan Publishers, London/BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  18. Muhamud NW (1996) Direction of soil conservation as a way of conserving the capability of the environment in Sedayu Sub-County-Bantul District, Yogyakarta, IndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  19. Muhamud NW, Sudarmadji (1998, December) The role of socio- economic factors in soil conservation implementation and management. Indones J Geogr 30(76):13–19Google Scholar
  20. NEMA (National Environment Management Authority) (1996) The state of environment report for Uganda. Kampala, UgandaGoogle Scholar
  21. NEMA (National Environment Management Authority) (1998) The state of environment report for Uganda. Kampala, UgandaGoogle Scholar
  22. NEMA (National Environment Management Authority) (2008) The state of environment report for Uganda 2008. Kampala, UgandaGoogle Scholar
  23. Nkonya ES, Norman D (1997) Factors affecting adoption of improved maize seeds and fertilizer in Northern Tanzania. J Agric Econ 48:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nkonya E, Schroeder, Norman D (1997) Factors affecting adoption of improved maize seeds and fertilizer in northern Tanzania. J Agric Econ 48:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nkonya E, Pender J, Kato E, Muwonge J (2004) Community natural resource management and its linkage to poverty in Uganda. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington D.C MimeoGoogle Scholar
  26. Nyirenda M, Kanyama-Phiri G, Bohringer A, Haule C (2001) Economic performance of improved fallow agroforestry technology for smallholder maize production in central Malawi. In: African Crop Science Conference Proceedings, vol 5. African Crop Science Society, Kampala, Uganda, pp 638–687Google Scholar
  27. OECD (1991) The state of the environment. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  28. OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) (1994) Towards sustainable agricultural production: cleaner technology. ParisGoogle Scholar
  29. Omara Ojungu PH (1992) Resource management in developing countries. Longman Group, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. Pender J (2004) Development pathways for hillsides and highlands: some lessons from central America and east Africa. Food Policy 29:339–367. Scholar
  31. PMA, (Plan for Modernisation of Agriculture), Annual Report for Financial Year 2006/2007Google Scholar
  32. PMA, (Plan for Modernisation of Agriculture), PMA Progress Report, June 2003Google Scholar
  33. Semgalawe ZM, (1998) House adoption behaviour and agricultural sustainability in the North Eastern Mountains of Tanzania: the case of soil conservation in the North Pare and West Usambara Mountains. PhD Thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  34. Rogers (1983) Diffusion of innovations, 3rd edn. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Tarrant JR (1980) Food policies. Wiley, Chichester/New York/Brisbane/TorontoGoogle Scholar
  36. Thirtle CG, Ruttan VW (1987) The role of demand and supply in the generation and diffusion of technical change. RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  37. Waugh D (2002) Geography: an integrated approach, 3rd edn. Nelson ThornesGoogle Scholar
  38. UBOS (Uganda Bureau of Statistics) (2007) Agricultural sector: gender statistics profile. Kampala, UgandaGoogle Scholar
  39. UBOS (Uganda Bureau of Statistics) (2014) Uganda national housing population vensus, provisional results. Kampala, UgandaGoogle Scholar
  40. UBOS (Uganda Bureau of Statistics) (2015) Uganda national housing population census. Kampala, UgandaGoogle Scholar
  41. UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme) (2006) Africa environment outlook 2. Nairobi, KenyaGoogle Scholar
  42. Upton DM, Kim B (1999) Alternative methods of learning and process improvement in manufacturing. J Oper Manag 16:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. White RG (1973) Africa: studies for east African students. Heinemann Educational Books, NairobiGoogle Scholar
  44. World Bank (2008) World development report- agriculture for development. Washington D.CGoogle Scholar
  45. Wortmann CS, Eledu CA (1999) Ugandas agro- ecological zones: a guide for planners and policy makers. Centro International de Agricultura Tropical, KampalaGoogle Scholar
  46. Yumbe District Local Government (2004) The Yumbe district state of the environment 2004. Yumbe, UgandaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nabalegwa Muhamud Wambede
    • 1
  • Asaba Joyfred
    • 1
  • Alule Rhombe Jimmy
    • 2
  1. 1.Kyambogo UniversityKampalaUganda
  2. 2.Gulu UniversityGuluUganda

Personalised recommendations