Advertisement

Remote Detection of Abnormal Behavior in Mechanical Systems

  • Greta Colford
  • Erica Jacobson
  • Kaden Plewe
  • Eric Flynn
  • Adam WachtorEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series book series (CPSEMS)

Abstract

Machinery can undergo many different types of operational faults during use. Mitigating these faults through scheduled maintenance programs or upon failure is costly, inefficient, and can introduce safety hazards. An alternative approach to identifying abnormal behavior in mechanical systems is through condition based monitoring, which is applied by taking measurements of machinery and using spectral analysis to diagnose faults. The signals produced by machines contain characteristic frequencies describing the operating state. The application of local sensors to monitor the health of mechanical systems is often expensive or not feasible; it is of interest to find methods of remote sensing to allow for detection of abnormalities in mechanical systems without the need for sensors at the local point of operation. This work intends to utilize the method of remote detection to study the diminishment of fault feature observability as a function of sensor location relative to operating equipment. In this study, the procedure used for fault detection consists of the following: (1) collect signals for rotating machinery operating in a healthy, faulty, and off state (2) identify features that are unique to a faulty operating state (3) use those features to identify faulty behavior. This procedure is performed at three locations. For each location, the observable feature for a healthy, faulty and motor off state is calculated and compared using the statistical mean, standard deviation, p-value and Bhattacharyya distance. The relationship between fault observability and distance is presented as a function of Bhattacharyya distance and classified based on a one-way ANOVA test. Machine fault diagnosis becomes more difficult as the measurement location increases. At greater distances, there is no statistical significance between healthy and faulty machine operation. Using a predictable frequency response, machine faults can be correctly identified up to a certain threshold determined by environment noise.

Keywords

Condition Monitoring Remote Sensing Rotating Machinery Signal Processing Spectral Analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    Farrar, C.R., Worden, K.: Structural Health Monitoring: A Machine Learning Perspective. Wiley, Hoboken (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    SpectraQuest Inc, Applied Vibration Analysis Training Manual & Laboratory Exercises, Richmond, VAGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mogal, S., Lalwani, D.: A brief review on fault diagnosis of rotating machinery. Appl. Mech. Mater. 541–542, 635–640 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kryer, R., Haynes, H.: Condition monitoring of machinery using motor current signaure analysis. In: Power Plant Dynamics, Control and Testing Symposium, vol. 7 (1989)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Filho, P.C., Brito, J.N., Silva, V.A., Pederiva, R.: Detection of electrical faults in induction motors using vibration analysis. J. Qual. Maint. Eng. 19(4), 364–380 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Singh, S., Kumar, A., Kumar, N.: Motor current signature analysis for bearing fault detection in mechanical systems. Procedia Mater. Sci. 6, 171–177 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Thomson, W.T., Orpin, P.: Current and vibration monitoring for fault diagnosis and root cause analysis of induction motor drives. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-First Turbomachinery Symposium, pp. 61–67 (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dykas, B., Becker, A.: Comparison of measurement techniques for remote diagnosis of damage in non-HUMS-equipped bearings. IEEE Aerospace Conference, pp. 1–16 (2016)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Siemens. What is a Frequency Response Function (FRF)? Siemens PLM Community (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhou, Y.-L., Figueiredo, E., Maia, N., Perera, R.: Damage detection and quantification using transmissibility coherence analysis. Shock. Vib. 2015, 290714, 16 pp. (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Konar, P., Chattopadhyay, P.: Bearing fault detection of induction motor using wavelet and Support Vector Machines (SVMs). Appl. Soft Comput. 11, 4203–4211 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen, F., Tang, B., Chen, R.: A novel fault diagnosis model for gearbox based on wavelet support vector machine with immune genetic algorithm. Measurement. 46, 220–232 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yan, R., Gao, R.X., Chen, X.: Wavelets for fault diagnosis of rotary machines: a review with applications. Signal Process. 96, 1–15 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Marmugi, L., Gori, L., Hussain, S., Deans, C., Renzoni, F.: Remote detection of rotating machinery with a portable atomic magnetometer. Appl. Opt. 57(3), 743 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hall, D.L., LLinas, J.: An introduction to multisensor data fusion. Proc. IEEE. 85(1), 6–23 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Safizadeh, M., Latifi, S.: Using multi-sensor data fusion for vibration fault diagnosis of rolling element bearings by accelerometer and load cell. Inform. Fusion. 18, 1–8 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dash, M., Lui, H.: Feature selection for classification. IDA Elsevier Intelligent Data Analysis. 1(97), 131–156 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ngolah, C.F., Morden, Ed, Wang, Y.: An intelligent fault recognizer for rotating machinery via remote characteristic vibration signal detection. In: IEEE 10th International Conference for Cognitive Computing (2011)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Danforth, S.M., Martz, J.T., Root, A.H., Flynn, E.B., Harvey, D.Y.: Multi-source sensing and analysis for machine-array conditioning monitoring. In: Structural Health Monitoring & Damange Detection, vol. 7, pp. 9–21 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Choi, E., Lee, C.: Feature extraction based on the Bhattacharyya distance. Pattern Recogn. 36(8), 1703–1709 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lee, C., Choi, E.: Bayes error evaluation of the Gaussian ML classifier. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 38(3), 1471–1475 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Greta Colford
    • 1
  • Erica Jacobson
    • 1
  • Kaden Plewe
    • 2
  • Eric Flynn
    • 3
  • Adam Wachtor
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Michigan Technological UniversityHoughtonUSA
  2. 2.University of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA
  3. 3.Los Alamos National LaboratoryLos AlamosUSA

Personalised recommendations