Advertisement

Cluster-Based Routing Protocols with Adaptive Transmission Range Adjustment in UWSNs

  • Muhammad Awais
  • Zahoor Ali Khan
  • Nadeem JavaidEmail author
  • Abdul Mateen
  • Aymen Rasul
  • Farooq Hassan
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies book series (LNDECT, volume 29)

Abstract

Nowadays, limited battery lifespan in Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks (UWSNs) is one of the key concerns for reliable data delivery. Traditional transmission approaches increase the transmission overhead, i.e., packet collision and congestion, which affects the reliable data delivery. Additionally, replacement of the sensors battery in the harsh aquatic environment is a challenging task. To save the network from sudden failure and to prolong the lifespan of the network, efficient routing protocols are needed to control the excessive energy dissipation. Therefore, this paper proposes two cluster-based routing protocols. The proposed protocols adaptively adjust their transmission range to keep maximum neighbors in their transmission range. This transmission range adjustment helps the routing protocols to retain their transmission process continuous by removing void holes from the network. Clusters formation in both proposed protocols makes the data transmission successful, which enhances the Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR). A comparative analysis is also performed with two state-of-the-art protocols named: Weighting Depth Forwarding Area Division, Depth Based Routing (WDFAD-DBR) and Cluster-Based WDFAD-DB (CB-WDFAD-DBR). Simulation results show the effectiveness of the proposed protocols in terms of PDR, Energy Consumption (EC) and End to End (E2E) delay.

Keywords

Energy efficient Void hole Shortest path approach Reliable data delivery Clustering 

References

  1. 1.
    Akyildiz, I.F., Pompili, D., Melodia, T.: Underwater acoustic sensor networks: research challenges. Ad Hoc Netw. 3(3), 257–279 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wu, H., Chen, M., Guan, X.: A network coding based routing protocol for underwater sensor networks. Sensors 12(4), 4559–4577 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Basagni, S., Petrioli, C., Petroccia, R., Spaccini, D.: CARP: a channel-aware routing protocol for underwater acoustic wireless networks. Ad Hoc Netw. 34, 92–104 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Francois, R.E., Garrison, G.R.: Sound absorption based on ocean measurements. Part II: boric acid contribution and equation for total absorption. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 72(6), 1879–1890 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sher, A., Khan, A., Javaid, N., Ahmed, S., Aalsalem, M., Khan, W.: Void hole avoidance for reliable data delivery in IoT enabled underwater wireless sensor networks. Sensors 18(10), 3271 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yildiz, H.U., Gungor, V.C., Tavli, B.: Packet size optimization for lifetime maximization in underwater acoustic sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. (2018)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rahim, S.S., Ahmed, S., Hadi, F.-E., Khan, A., Usman Akhtar, M., Javed, L.: Depth-based adaptive and energy-aware (DAE) routing scheme for UWSNs. EAI Endorsed Trans. Energy Web 5(17), e6 (2018)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li, X., Wang, C., Yang, Z., Yan, L., Han, S.: Energy-efficient and secure transmission scheme based on chaotic compressive sensing in underwater wireless sensor networks. Digit. Signal Process. 81, 129–137 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Khan, A., Ali, I., Rahman, A.U., Imran, M., Mahmood, H.: Co-EEORS: cooperative energy efficient optimal relay selection protocol for underwater wireless sensor networks. IEEE Access 6, 28777–28789 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yahya, A., Islam, S., Akhunzada, A., Ahmed, G., Shamshirband, S., Lloret, J.: Towards efficient sink mobility in underwater wireless sensor networks. Energies 11(6), 1471 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dosaranian-Moghadam, M., Amo-Rahimi, Z.: Energy efficiency and reliability in underwater wireless sensor networks using cuckoo optimizer algorithm. AUT J. Electr. Eng. 50(1), 93–100 (2018)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Khan, G., Dwivedi, R.K.: Energy efficient routing algorithm for void avoidance in UWSN using residual energy and depth varianceGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang, Z., Han, G., Qin, H., Zhang, S., Sui, Y.: An energy-aware and void-avoidable routing protocol for underwater sensor networks. IEEE Access 6, 7792–7801 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tuna, G.: Clustering-based energy-efficient routing approach for underwater wireless sensor networks. Int. J. Sens. Netw. 27(1), 26–36 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hou, R., He, L., Hu, S., Luo, J.: Energy-balanced unequal layering clustering in underwater acoustic sensor networks. IEEE Access 6, 39685–39691 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ahmed, M., Salleh, M., Ibrahim Channa, M.: CBE2R: clustered-based energy efficient routing protocol for underwater wireless sensor network. Int. J. Electron. 105(11), 1916–1930 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yu, H., Yao, N., Wang, T., Li, G., Gao, Z., Tan, G.: WDFAD-DBR: weighting depth and forwarding area division DBR routing protocol for UASNs. Ad Hoc Netw. 37, 256–282 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kuniyasu, T., Shigeyasu, T.: Data-centric communication strategy for wireless sensor networks. Int. J. Space-Based Situated Comput. 8(1), 30–39 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Serhan, Z., Diab, W.B.: Energy efficient QoS routing and adaptive status update in WMSNS. Int. J. Space-Based Situated Comput. 6(3), 129–146 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Togawa, K., Hashimoto, K.: Cooperative and priority based on dynamic resource adaptation method in wireless network. Int. J. Space-Based Situated Comput. 8(1), 40–49 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chen, L., Liu, L., Qi, X., Zheng, G.: Cooperation forwarding data gathering strategy of wireless sensor networks. Int. J. Grid Util. Comput. 8(1), 46–52 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gupta, B.K., Patnaik, S., Mallick, M.K., Nayak, A.K.: Dynamic routing algorithm in wireless mesh network. Int. J. Grid Util. Comput. 8(1), 53–60 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Muhammad Awais
    • 1
  • Zahoor Ali Khan
    • 2
  • Nadeem Javaid
    • 1
    Email author
  • Abdul Mateen
    • 1
  • Aymen Rasul
    • 1
  • Farooq Hassan
    • 3
  1. 1.COMSATS University IslamabadIslamabadPakistan
  2. 2.Computer Information Science, Higher Colleges of TechnologyFujairahUAE
  3. 3.University of Lahore, Islamabad CampusIslamabadPakistan

Personalised recommendations