Advertisement

IoT Device Selection in Opportunistic Networks: A Fuzzy Approach Considering IoT Device Failure Rate

  • Miralda CukaEmail author
  • Donald Elmazi
  • Keita Matsuo
  • Makoto Ikeda
  • Leonard Barolli
  • Makoto Takizawa
Conference paper
First Online:
Part of the Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies book series (LNDECT, volume 29)

Abstract

In opportunistic networks the communication opportunities (contacts) are intermittent and there is no need to establish an end-to-end link between the communication nodes. The enormous growth of devices having access to the Internet, along the vast evolution of the Internet and the connectivity of objects and devices, has evolved as Internet of Things (IoT). There are different issues for these networks. One of them is the selection of IoT devices in order to carry out a task in opportunistic networks. In this work, we implement a Fuzzy-Based System for IoT device selection in opportunistic networks. For our system, we use four input parameters: IoT Device’s Number of Past Encounters (IDNPE), IoT Device Storage (IDST), IoT Device Remaining Energy (IDRE) and IoT Device Failure Rate (IDFR). The output parameter is IoT Device Selection Decision (IDSD). The simulation results show that the proposed system makes a proper selection decision of IoT devices in opportunistic networks. The IoT device selection is increased up to 12% and 26% by increasing IDNPE and IDFR, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Mantas, N., Louta, M., Karapistoli, E., Karetsos, G.T., Kraounakis, S., Obaidat, M.S.: Towards an incentive-compatible, reputation-based framework for stimulating cooperation in opportunistic networks: a survey. IET Networks 6(6), 169–178 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sharma, D.K., Sharma, A., Kumar, J., et al.: KNNR: K-nearest neighbour classification based routing protocol for opportunistic networks. In: 10-th International Conference on Contemporary Computing (IC3), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2017)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kraijak, S., Tuwanut, P.: A survey on internet of things architecture, protocols, possible applications, security, privacy, real-world implementation and future trends. In: 16th International Conference on Communication Technology (ICCT), pp. 26–31. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arridha, R., Sukaridhoto, S., Pramadihanto, D., Funabiki, N.: Classification extension based on iot-big data analytic for smart environment monitoring and analytic in real-time system. Int. J. Space-Based Situated Comput. 7(2), 82–93 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dhurandher, S.K., Sharma, D.K., Woungang, I., Bhati, S.: HBPR: history based prediction for routing in infrastructure-less opportunistic networks. In: 27th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA), pp. 931–936. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Spaho, E., Mino, G., Barolli, L., Xhafa, F.: Goodput and PDR analysis of AODV, OLSR and DYMO protocols for vehicular networks using cavenet. Int. J. Grid Utility Comput. 2(2), 130–138 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Abdulla, M., Simon, R.: The impact of intercontact time within opportunistic networks: protocol implications and mobility models. TechRepublic White Paper (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Patra, T.K., Sunny, A.: Forwarding in heterogeneous mobile opportunistic networks. IEEE Commun. Lett. 22(3), 626–629 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Le, T., Gerla, M.: Contact duration-aware routing in delay tolerant networks. In: International Conference on Networking, Architecture and Storage (NAS), pp. 1–8. IEEE (2017)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Popereshnyak, S., Suprun, O., Suprun, O., Wieckowski, T.: IoI application testing features based on the modelling network. In: The 14-th International Conference on Perspective Technologies and Methods in MEMS Design (MEMSTECH), pp. 127–131. IEEE (2018)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen, N., Yang, Y., Li, J., Zhang, T.: A fog-based service enablement architecture for cross-domain IoT applications. In: Fog World Congress (FWC), 2017 IEEE, pp. 1–6. IEEE (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pozza, R., Nati, M., Georgoulas, S., Moessner, K., Gluhak, A.: Neighbor discovery for opportunistic networking in internet of things scenarios: a survey. IEEE Access 3, 1101–1131 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Akbas, M., Turgut, D.: Apawsan: actor positioning for aerial wireless sensor and actor networks. In: IEEE 36th Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN-2011), October 2011, pp. 563–570 (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Akbas, M., Brust, M., Turgut, D.: Local positioning for environmental monitoring in wireless sensor and actor networks. In: IEEE 35th Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN-2010), October 2010, pp. 806–813 (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Melodia, T., Pompili, D., Gungor, V., Akyildiz, I.: Communication and Coordination in Wireless Sensor and Actor Networks. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 6(10), 1126–1129 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Inaba, T., Sakamoto, S., Kolici, V., Mino, G., Barolli, L.: A CAC scheme based on fuzzy logic for cellular networks considering security and priority parameters. In: The 9-th International Conference on Broadband and Wireless Computing, Communication and Applications (BWCCA-2014), pp. 340–346 (2014)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Spaho, E., Sakamoto, S., Barolli, L., Xhafa, F., Barolli, V., Iwashige, J.: A fuzzy-based system for peer reliability in JXTA-overlay P2P considering number of interactions. In: The 16th International Conference on Network-Based Information Systems (NBiS-2013), pp. 156–161 (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Matsuo, K., Elmazi, D., Liu, Y., Sakamoto, S., Mino, G., Barolli, L.: FACS-MP: a fuzzy admission control system with many priorities for wireless cellular networks and its performance evaluation. J. High Speed Netwo. 21(1), 1–14 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Grabisch, M.: The application of fuzzy integrals in multicriteria decision making. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 89(3), 445–456 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Inaba, T., Elmazi, D., Liu, Y., Sakamoto, S., Barolli, L., Uchida, K.: Integrating wireless cellular and ad-hoc networks using fuzzy logic considering node mobility and security. In: The 29th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (WAINA-2015), pp. 54–60 (2015)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kulla, E., Mino, G., Sakamoto, S., Ikeda, M., Caballé, S., Barolli, L.: FBMIS: a fuzzy-based multi-interface system for cellular and ad hoc networks. In: International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA-2014), pp. 180–185 (2014)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Elmazi, D., Kulla, E., Oda, T., Spaho, E., Sakamoto, S., Barolli, L.: A comparison study of two fuzzy-based systems for selection of actor node in wireless sensor actor networks. J. Ambient Intell. Hum. Comput. 6(5), 635–645 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zadeh, L.: Fuzzy logic, neural networks, and soft computing. ACM Commun. 37, 77–84 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Spaho, E., Sakamoto, S., Barolli, L., Xhafa, F., Ikeda, M.: Trustworthiness in P2P: performance behaviour of two fuzzy-based systems for JXTA-overlay platform. Soft Comput. 18(9), 1783–1793 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Inaba, T., Sakamoto, S., Kulla, E., Caballe, S., Ikeda, M., Barolli, L.: An integrated system for wireless cellular and ad-hoc networks using fuzzy logic. In: International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems (INCoS-2014), pp. 157–162 (2014)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Matsuo, K., Elmazi, D., Liu, Y., Sakamoto, S., Barolli, L.: A multi-modal simulation system for wireless sensor networks: a comparison study considering stationary and mobile sink and event. J. Ambient Intell. Hum. Comput. 6(4), 519–529 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kolici, V., Inaba, T., Lala, A., Mino, G., Sakamoto, S., Barolli, L.: A fuzzy-based CAC scheme for cellular networks considering security. In: International Conference on Network-Based Information Systems (NBiS-2014), pp. 368–373 (2014)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Liu, Y., Sakamoto, S., Matsuo, K., Ikeda, M., Barolli, L., Xhafa, F.: A comparison study for two fuzzy-based systems: improving reliability and security of JXTA-overlay P2P platform. Soft Comput. 20(7), 2677–2687 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Matsuo, K., Elmazi, D., Liu, Y., Sakamoto, S., Mino, G., Barolli, L.: FACS-MP: a fuzzy admission control system with many priorities for wireless cellular networks and its perforemance evaluation. J. High Speed Netw. 21(1), 1–14 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mendel, J.M.: Fuzzy logic systems for engineering: a tutorial. Proc. IEEE 83(3), 345–377 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miralda Cuka
    • 1
    Email author
  • Donald Elmazi
    • 2
  • Keita Matsuo
    • 2
  • Makoto Ikeda
    • 2
  • Leonard Barolli
    • 2
  • Makoto Takizawa
    • 3
  1. 1.Graduate School of Engineering, Fukuoka Institute of Technology (FIT)Higashi-Ku, FukuokaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Information and Communication EngineeringFukuoka Institute of Technology (FIT)Higashi-Ku, FukuokaJapan
  3. 3.Department of Advanced Sciences, Faculty of Science and EngineeringHosei UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations

Cite paper