Advertisement

Mooring System Optimization for a Spar-Buoy Wind Turbine in Rough Wind and Sea Conditions

  • G. BarbantiEmail author
  • E. Marino
  • C. Borri
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 27)

Abstract

In this paper the dynamic response of a spar-buoy floating offshore wind turbine (FOWT) is investigated in order to optimize the design of the deep water mooring system. Several mooring system design parameters are considered respecting the assigned constraints with the aim to minimize the platform motions, the normal stress in the mooring lines and the fatigue estimation for harsh environmental conditions. The influence of mooring line ballasting positioning and their amount along the cables is investigated and compared to the reference case.

Keywords

Wind turbines Mooring lines optimization Fatigue 

References

  1. Brommundt G, Krause L, Merz K, Muskulus M (2012) Mooring system optimization for floating wind turbines using frequency domain analysis. Energy Proc 24:289–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen D, Gao P, Huang S, Fan K, Zhuang N, Liao Y (2017) Dynamic response and mooring optimization of spar-type substructure under combined action of wind, wave, and current. J Renew Sustain Energy 9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Davidson J, Ringwood J (2017) Mathematical modelling of mooring systems for wave energy converters—a review. Energies 10:666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. DNV-OS-E301 (2010) Offshore standard - Position Mooring. Standard. Det Norske Veritas [DNV]Google Scholar
  5. Faltinsen OM (1995) Sea loads on ships and offshore structures. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Fylling I, Berthelsen P (2011) WINDOPT - an optimization tool for floating support structures for deep water wind turbines. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2011 30th international conference on ocean, offshore and arctic engineering, OMAE 2011. Rotterdam, Netherlands, p 1–10Google Scholar
  7. Haid L, Matha D, Stewart G, Lackner M, Jonkman J, Robertson A (2013) Simulation-length requirements in the loads analysis of offshore floating wind turbines. In: 32nd international conference on ocean, offshore and arctic engineering, Nantes, France, 9–14 June 2013Google Scholar
  8. Hall M, Buckham B, Crawford C (2013) Evaluating the importance of mooring line model fidelity in floating offshore wind turbine simulations. Wind Energy 17(12):1835–1853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. IEC 61400-3 (2009) Ed. 1: Wind Turbines-Part 3: Design Requirement for Offshore Wind Turbines (International Electrotechnical Commission, 2009)Google Scholar
  10. Jonkman J, Buhl M (2005) FAST user’s guide. Technical report NREL/EL-500-38230Google Scholar
  11. Jonkman J, Robertson AM, Hayman GJ HydroDyn user’s guide and theory manual. Technical report (draft version)Google Scholar
  12. Jonkman J (2010) Definition of the floating system for phase IV of OC3. Technical report NREL/TP-500-47535Google Scholar
  13. Karimirad M, Moan T (2011) Extreme dynamic structural response analysis of catenary moored spar wind turbine in harsh environmental conditions. J Offshore Mech Arctic Eng 133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kamirad M, Moan T (2012) Wave- and wind-induced dynamic response of a spar-type offshore wind turbine. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 138(1):9–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kvittem MI, Moan T (2012) Effect of mooring line modelling on motions and structural fatigue damage for a semisubmersible wind turbine. In: Proceedings of the twenty-second international offshore and polar engineering conference, Rhodes, Greece, pp 273–278Google Scholar
  16. Li H, Hu Z, Wang J, Meng X (2018) Short-term fatigue analysis for tower base of a spar-type wind turbine under stochastic wind-wave load. Int J Naval Archit Ocean Eng 10(1):9–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Marino E, Lugni C, Manuel L, Nguyen H, Borri C (2014) Simulation of nonlinear waves on offshore wind turbines and associated fatigue load assessment. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2014 33rd international conference on ocean, offshore and arctic engineering, San Francisco, California, USAGoogle Scholar
  18. Matha D, Schilpf M, Cordle A, Pereira R, Jonkman J (2011) Challenges in simulation of aerodynamics, hydrodynamics, and mooring-line dynamics of floating offshore wind turbine. In: 21st international offshore and polar engineering conference, Maui, Hawaii, 19–24 June 2011Google Scholar
  19. MathWorks (2003) Optimization toolbox user’s guide for use with MATLABGoogle Scholar
  20. Ragan P, Manuel L (2007) Comparing estimates of wind turbine fatigue loads using time-domain and spectral methods. Wind Eng 31(2):83–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rainey RCT (1989) New equation for calculating wave loads on structures. J Fluid Mech 204:295–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sutherland HJ (1999) On the fatigue analysis of wind turbines. Sandia National Laboratories, SAND99-0089Google Scholar
  23. Wendt F, Robertson A, Jonkman J, Hayman G (2015) Verification of new floating capabilities in FAST v8. In: Proceedings of AIAA SciTech 2015. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Florida, USA, pp 1–11Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of FlorenceFlorenceItaly

Personalised recommendations