Mixture Model in High-Order Statistics for Peak Factor Estimation on Low-Rise Building
To design reliable structures, extreme pressures and peak factors are required. In many applications of Wind Engineering, their statistical analysis has to be performed considering the non-Gaussianity of the wind pressures. With the increasing precision and sampling frequency of pressure sensors, short and local peak events of large amplitude are more usually captured. Their relevance is naturally questioned in the context of a structural design. Furthermore, the increasing computational power allows for accumulation and analysis of larger data sets revealing the detailed nature of wind flows around bluff bodies. In particular, in the shear layers and where local vortices form, it is commonly admitted that the Probability Density Function (PDF) of measured pressures might exhibit two or more significant components. These mixed flows can be modelled with mixture models (Cook 2016). Whenever several processes coexist, and when one of them is leading in the tail of the statistical distribution, as will be seen next in the context of corner vortices over a flat roof, it is natural to construct the extreme value model with this leading process and not with the mixed observed pressures. It is therefore important to separate the different processes that can be observed in the pressure histories. Once this is done, specific analytical formulations of non-Gaussian peak factors can be used to evaluate the statistics of extreme values (Kareem and Zhao 1994; Chen and Huang 2009). The separation of mixed processes is usually done by means of the PDF of the signals (Cook 2016). This information is of course essential to perform an accurate decomposition, but it might be facilitated by considering higher rank information like auto-correlations and higher correlations like the triple or quadruple correlation. Indeed, the two phenomena that need to be separated and identified might be characterized by significantly different timescales, which are not reflected in the PDF. In this paper, the large negative pressures measured on a flat roof are analyzed and decomposed into two elementary processes, namely, the flapping corner vortex and the turbulent flow detaching from the sharp upstream edge. This paper will finally show that an accurate decomposition of the recorded pressures into their underlying modes provides a more meaningful evaluation of the extreme pressures.
KeywordsWind pressure Peak factor Non-Gaussianity Mixture distribution Wind tunnel tests Low-rise building
The research described in this paper has been partially supported by the National Fund for Scientific Research.
- Amerio L (2014) Numerical and experimental analysis of peak pressure loads on rectangular building. Master’s dissertation, Politecnico di MilanoGoogle Scholar
- Amerio L (2017) Experimental high resolution analysis of the pressure peaks on a building scale model façades. PhD dissertation, Politecnico di MilanoGoogle Scholar
- Berg H, Tijdeman H (1965) Theoretical and experimental results for the dynamic response of pressure measuring systems. National Aero and Aeronautical Research Institute, NLR-TR F.238Google Scholar
- Davenport AG (1964) Note on the distribution of the largest value of a random function with application to gust loading. J Inst Civ Eng 24:187–196Google Scholar
- Eurocode (1991) EN 1991-1-3: Actions on Structures-General Actions-Wind Actions. European Committee for StandardizationGoogle Scholar
- Lawson TV (1980) Wind effect on buildings: design applications, vol 1. Applied Science Publishers, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Rigo F (2017) Unsteady pressure measurement around aerodynamic bodies: development of a calibration apparatus and wind tunnel testing. Master’s dissertation, University of LiègeGoogle Scholar
- Winterstein SR (1988) Nonlinear vibration models for extremes and fatigue. J Eng Mech 114:1772–1790Google Scholar
- Winterstein SR, Ude TC, Kleiven G (1994) Springing and slow-drift responses: predicted extremes and fatigue vs. simulation. In: Proceedings of BOSS-94, vol 3. MIT, pp 1–15Google Scholar