Advertisement

Experimental Tests on the Wave-Induced Response of a Tension Leg Platform Supporting a 5 MW Wind Turbine

  • L. RiefoloEmail author
  • M. Vardaroglu
  • A. M. Avossa
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 27)

Abstract

Floating offshore wind turbines are complex dynamic structures, and the analysis of their environmental loads requires experimental test investigations. This paper aims to provide the experience gained from wave basin experiments performed at the Danish Hydraulic Institute on a floating wind turbine Tension Leg Platform within the framework of the EU-Hydralab IV Integrated Infrastructure Initiative. Froude-scaled model was subjected to regular waves and steady wind loads. Measurements were taken of hydrodynamics, displacements and wave induced forces at the mooring lines. First, free vibration and hammer tests were performed to obtain the natural frequencies of the floating motions and tower elastic behaviour, respectively. Then, displacements, rotations, and forces were measured under regular waves and parked and rated wind conditions. Spectral analyses were carried out to investigate the dynamic response of TLP wind turbine. The results show that most of the dynamic response occurs at the wave frequency and natural frequencies.

Keywords

Floating wind turbine TLP Experimental tests Free decay tests Dynamic analyses 

References

  1. Avossa AM, Demartino C, Contestabile P, Ricciardelli F, Vicinanza D (2017a) Some results on the vulnerability assessment of HAWTs subjected to wind and seismic actions. Sustainability 9:1525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Avossa AM, Demartino C, Ricciardelli F (2017b) Peak response of hawts to wind and seismic actions. In: Proceedings of the 7th European and African conference on wind engineering, EACWE 2017, Liège, 4–7 July 2017Google Scholar
  3. Avossa AM, Demartino C, Ricciardelli F (2017c). Assessment of the peak response of a 5 MW HAWT under combined wind and seismic induced loads. Open Constr Build Technol J 11:441–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brodtkorb PA, Johannesson P, Lindgren G, Rychlik I, Rydén J, Sjö E (2000) WAFO - a MATLAB toolbox for analysis of random waves and loads. In: 10th international offshore and polar engineering conference, Seattle, USA, vol III, pp 343–350Google Scholar
  5. Browning JR, Jonkman J, Robertson A, Goupee AJ (2012) Calibration and validation of a spar-type floating offshore wind turbine model using the FAST-dynamic simulation tool. J Phys Conf Ser 555(2014):012015Google Scholar
  6. Butterfield S, Musial W, Jonkman J, Sclavounos P (2007) Engineering challenges for floating wind turbines. Report NREL/CP-500-38776, United StatesGoogle Scholar
  7. Goupee AJ, Koo B, Kimball RW, Lambrakos KF, Dagher HJ (2012) Experimental comparison of three floating wind turbine concepts. In: 31st international conference on off-shore mechanics and arctic engineering, OMAE, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1–6 July 2012Google Scholar
  8. IEC 61400-1, Ed. 2, wind turbine generator systems, part 1: safety requirements (1999)Google Scholar
  9. IEC 61400-3, Ed. 1, Wind turbines, Part 3: Design requirements for offshore wind turbines (2009) California at Berkeley, Fourth edn. Prentice Hall (2012)Google Scholar
  10. Jonkman JM, Buhl ML Jr (2005) FAST user’s guide, Technical report NREL, TP-500-38230Google Scholar
  11. Jonkman J, Butterfield S, Musial W, Scott G (2009) Definition of a 5-MW reference wind turbine for offshore system development, NREL report, Golden, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  12. Jonkman J, Matha D (2009) A quantitative comparison of the responses of three floating platform. In: Proceedings of European offshore wind 2009 conference and exhibition, NREL/CP-500-46726Google Scholar
  13. Jonkman J (2010) Definition of the floating system for phase IV of OC3. NREL report, Golden, Colorado, May 2010Google Scholar
  14. Mansard EPD, Funke ER (1980) The measurement of incident and reflected spectra using a least squares method. In: Proceedings of the international conference on coastal engineering, Sidney, Australia, pp 154–172Google Scholar
  15. Matha D (2009) Model development and loads analysis of an offshore wind turbine on a tension leg platform, with a comparison to other floating turbine concepts. Technical report NREL/SR-500-45891, United StatesGoogle Scholar
  16. Nihei Y, Iijima K, Murai M, Ikoma T (2014) A comparative study of motion performance of four different FOWT designs in combined wind and wave loads. In: 33rd international conference on offshore mechanics and arctic engineering, San Francisco, USA, 8–13 June 2014Google Scholar
  17. Oguz E, Clelland D, Day AH, Incecik A, López JA, Sánchez G, Almeria GG (2018) Experimental and numerical analysis of a TLP floating offshore wind turbine. Ocean Eng 147:591–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pegalajar-Jurado A, Hansen AM, Laugesen R, Mikkelsen RF, Borg M, Kim T, Heilskov NF, Bredmose H (2016) Experimental and numerical study of a 10 MW TLP wind turbine in waves and wind. J Phys 753:092007Google Scholar
  19. Riefolo L, Lanfredi C, Azzellino A, Vicinanza D, Tomasicchio GR, D’Alessandro F, Penchev V (2016) Offshore wind turbines: an overview of the effects on the marine environment. In: Proceedings of the international society of offshore and polar engineers (ISOPE), Rhodes (Rodos), Greece, pp 427–434, 26 June–2 July 2016Google Scholar
  20. Riefolo L, del Jesus F, Guanche RG, Tomasicchio GR, Pantusa D (2018) Wind/wave misalignment effects on mooring line tensions for a spar buoy wind turbine. In: Proceedings of the international conference on offshore mechanics and arctic engineering, Madrid, Spain, 17–22 June, paper n° OMAE2018-77586 (in press)Google Scholar
  21. Sclavounos PD, Tracy C, Lee S (2008) Floating off-shore wind turbines: responses in a sea state, Pareto optimal designs and economic assessment. In: Proceedings of the 27th international conference on offshore mechanics and arctic engineering, OMAE, Estoril, Portugal, 15–20 June 2008Google Scholar
  22. Shin H (2011) Model test of the OC3-Hywind floating offshore wind turbine. In: Proceedings of the 21st international society of offshore and polar engineers (ISOPE), Hawaii, USA, 19–24 June 2011Google Scholar
  23. Skaare B, Nielsen FG, Hanson TD, Yttervik R, Havmøller O, Rekdal A (2015) Analysis of measurements and simulations from the Hywind Demo floating wind turbine. Wind Energy 18:1105–1122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Statoil (2017). Hywind. Floating Offshore Wind 2017, Norwegian Energy Partners, 26 January, Bryggetorget, OsloGoogle Scholar
  25. Tomasicchio GR, Avossa AM, Riefolo L, Ricciardelli F, Musci E, D’Alessandro F, Vicinanza D (2017) Dynamic modelling of a spar buoy wind turbine. In: Proceedings of the international conference on offshore mechanics and arctic engineering, Trondheim, Norway, Paper N. OMAE2017-62246, pp V010T09A083–V010T09A093, 25–30 June 2017Google Scholar
  26. Tomasicchio GR, Armenio E, D’Alessandro F, Fonseca N, Mavrakos SA, Penchev V, Schüttrumpf H, Voutsinas S, Kirkegaard, J, Jensen PM (2012) Design of a 3D physical and numerical experiment on floating off-shore wind turbines. In: 33rd Conference on Coastal Engineering, Santander, Spain, 1–6 July2012Google Scholar
  27. Tomasicchio G, D’Alessandro F, Avossa AM, Riefolo L, Musci E, Ricciardelli F, Vicinanza D (2018) Experimental modelling of the dynamic behaviour of a spar buoy wind turbine. Renew Energy 127:412–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tomasicchio GR, D’Alessandro F, Musci E, Fonseca N, Mavrakos SA, Kirkegaard J, Katsaounis GM, Penchev V, Schüttrumpf H, Wolbring J, Armenio E (2014) Physical model experiments on floating off-shore wind turbines. In: Hydralab IV joint user meeting, Lisbon, Portugal, 2–4 July 2014Google Scholar
  29. Wayman EN, Sclavounos PD, Butterfield S, Jonkman J, Musial W (2006) Coupled dynamic modeling of floating wind turbine systems. In: The Proceedings of the Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, NREL/CP-500-39481, 1–4 May 2006Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Engineering (DI)Università della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”AversaItaly

Personalised recommendations