Advertisement

Simultaneous Vibration Suppression and Energy Harvesting in Wind Excited Tall Buildings Equipped with the Tuned Mass Damper Inerter (TMDI)

  • F. PetriniEmail author
  • Z. Wang
  • A. Giaralis
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 27)

Abstract

This paper investigates the potential of tuned mass dampers (TMDs) coupled with inerter devices in different tuned mass dampers inerter (TMDI) topologies to dissipate oscillations in tall buildings due to vortex shedding in the across wind direction while generating electric energy. The TMDI is first optimized for minimizing peak accelerations for serviceability purposes in a 74 storey benchmark steel building under different wind intensity levels. It is seen that TMDI stiffness and damping optimal parameters are robust to design/reference wind velocity and, therefore, to potential climate change effects, while achieving same level of performance using significantly smaller attached mass compared to the classical TMD. Then, a regenerative electromagnetic motor (EM) is added to the TMDI allowing for varying the TMDI damping property as well as transforming part of the dissipated kinetic energy to electricity. It is shown that by increasing TMDI damping above the optimal value for vibration suppression and/or by reducing the inerter property increases the available energy for harvesting at the expense of larger floor accelerations. Therefore, it is concluded that by relaxing serviceability limit state requirements associated with occupancy considerations renders possible an increase in energy generation in wind-excited tall buildings.

Keywords

Tuned mass damper inerter Energy harvesting Tall buildings 

References

  1. Charles A, Dennis JE Jr (2003) Analysis of generalized pattern searches. SIAM J Optim 13(3):889–903MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Davenport AG (1964) Note on the distribution of the largest value of a random function with application to gust loading. Proc Inst Civil Eng 28:187–196Google Scholar
  3. Giaralis A, Petrini F (2017) Wind-induced vibration mitigation in tall buildings using the tuned mass-damper-inerter. J Struct Eng ASCE 143(9).  https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001863. Article Number 04017127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gonzalez-Buelga A, Clare LR, Cammarano A, Neild SA, Burrow SG, Inman DJ (2014) An optimised tuned mass damper/harvester device. Struct Control Health Monit 21(8):1154–1169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Huang MF, Chan CM, Lou WJ, Kwok KCS (2012) Statistical extremes and peak factors in wind-induced vibration of tall buildings. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A 13(1):18–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ierimonti L, Caracoglia L, Venanzi I, Materazzi AL (2017) Investigation on life-cycle damage cost of wind-excited tall buildings considering directionality effects. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 171:207–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ierimonti L, Venanzi I, Caracoglia L (2018) Life-cycle damage-based cost analysis of tall buildings equipped with tuned mass dampers. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 176:54–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Liang S, Liu S, Li QS, Zhang L, Gu M (2002) Mathematical model of across-wind dynamic loads on rectangular tall buildings. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 90:201–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lazar IF, Neild SA, Wagg DJ (2014) Using an inerter-based device for structural vibration suppression. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 43(8):1129–1147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lazarek M, Brzeski P, Perlikowsi P (2018) Design and identification of parameters of tuned mass damper with inerter which enables changes of inertance. Mech Mach Theor 119:161–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Marian L, Giaralis A (2014) Optimal design of a novel tuned mass-damper–inerter (TMDI) passive vibration control configuration for stochastically support-excited structural systems. Probab Eng Mech 38:156–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Marian L, Giaralis A (2017) The tuned mass-damper-inerter for harmonic vibrations suppression, attached mass reduction, and energy harvesting. Smart Struct Syst 19(6):665–678Google Scholar
  13. Rana R, Soong TT (1998) Parametric study and simplified design of tuned mass dampers. Eng Struct 20(3):193–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Smith MC (2002) Synthesis of mechanical networks: the inerter. IEEE Trans Autom Control 47(10):1648–1662MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Steenbergen RDJM, Koster T, Geurts CPW (2012) The effect of climate change and natural variability on wind loading values for buildings. Build Environ 55:178–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Tang X, Zuo L (2012) Simultaneous energy harvesting and vibration control of structures with tuned mass dampers. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 23(18):2117–2127CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Structural and Geotechnical EngineeringSapienza University of RomeRomeItaly
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringCity, University of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations