Advertisement

Wind–Wave Loading and Response of OWT Monopiles in Rough Seas

  • A. MockuteEmail author
  • C. Borri
  • E. Marino
  • C. Lugni
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 27)

Abstract

Monopile-supported OWTs are prone to ringing – a dangerous nonlinear resonant phenomenon which is still not fully understood. Both wind and waves have a major influence on it, wind with its aerodynamic damping in the case of an operating wind turbine, and waves due to the fact that only in the case of fully nonlinear wave kinematics such phenomenon has been observed numerically. This study is interested in both of these influences, especially in the case of misaligned wind and waves – when the nonlinearities of waves are coming from a direction of reduced aerodynamic damping. However, for the influence of wave nonlinearities to be fully understood and the most accurate loading model to be used in the study, an intermediate investigation is conducted comparing the loading from combinations of six models for wave kinematics in increasing nonlinearity and three hydrodynamic loading models – Morison equation, slender-body theory in its two used formulations, and FNV perturbation theory on a fixed cylinder representative of an OWT monopile. It has been found that wave kinematics from fifth order could already be sufficient to capture the nonlinear loading in such steep waves as long as a suitable more sophisticated loading model is used. Moreover, none of the considered combinations in this two-dimensional study manage to capture the secondary load cycle, which used to be directly linked to ringing, therefore in the next phase a moving cylinder is to be considered to analyse the potential of capturing ringing in the most efficient manner before moving to the full dynamic OWT in wind and waves.

Keywords

Offshore wind turbines Numerical wave modelling Ringing Highly nonlinear waves 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The activity presented in the paper is part of the European Commission’s Framework Program “Horizon 2020”, through the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Innovative Training Network (ITN) “AEOLUS4FUTURE - Efficient harvesting of the wind energy” (H2020-MSCA-ITN-2014: Grant agreement no. 643167). The COST TU1304 action WINERCOST is also gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Chakrabarti SK (1987) Hydrodynamics of offshore structures. 1. Offshore structures - Hydrodynamics I. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  2. Chaplin JR, Rainey RCT, Yemm RW (1997) Ringing of a vertical cylinder in waves. J Fluid Mech 350:119–147MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Faltinsen OM, Newman JN, Vinje T (1995) Nonlinear wave loads on a slender vertical cylinder. J Fluid Mech 289:179–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Grue J, Huseby M (2002) Higher harmonic wave forces and ringing of vertical cylinders. Appl Ocean Res 24(4):203–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Grue J, Bjorshol G, Strand Ø (1994) Nonlinear wave loads which may generate ‘ringing’ responses of offshore structures. In: 9th international workshop on water waves and floating bodies, 17–20 April, Kuju, Fukuoka, JapanGoogle Scholar
  6. GWEC (2017) Global wind report: annual market update 2017. Global Wind Energy CouncilGoogle Scholar
  7. Huseby M, Grue J (2000) An experimental investigation of higher-harmonic wave forces on a vertical cylinder. J Fluid Mech 414:75–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jonkman J, Buhl M (2005) FAST user’s guide, Technical report. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, COGoogle Scholar
  9. Jonkman J, Musial W (2010) Offshore code comparison collaboration (OC3) for IEA task 23 offshore wind technology and deployment, Technical report. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, COGoogle Scholar
  10. Jonkman JM, Butterfield S, Musial W, Scott G (2009) Definition of a 5-MW reference wind turbine for offshore system development, Technical report. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, COGoogle Scholar
  11. Jonkman JM, Robertson AN, Hayman GJ (2014) HydroDyn user’s guide and theory manual, Technical report. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, COGoogle Scholar
  12. Jonkman J, Robertson A, Popko W et al (2012) Offshore code comparison collaboration continuation (OC4), phase i – results of coupled simulations of an offshore wind turbine with jacket support structure. In: 22nd international conference on ocean, offshore and arctic engineering, 17–22 June, Rhodes, GreeceGoogle Scholar
  13. Kristiansen T, Faltinsen OM (2017) Higher harmonic wave loads on a vertical cylinder in finite water depth. J Fluid Mech 833:773–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Malenica S, Molin B (1995) Third-harmonic wave diffraction by a vertical cylinder. J Fluid Mechanics 302:203–229MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Marino E, Lugni C, Borri C (2013a) The role of the nonlinear wave kinematics on the global responses of an OWT in parked and operating conditions. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 123:363–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Marino E (2010) An integrated nonlinear wind-waves model for offshore wind turbines. Firenze University PressGoogle Scholar
  17. Marino E, Lugni C, Borri C (2013b) A novel numerical strategy for the simulation of irregular nonlinear waves and their effects on the dynamic response of offshore wind turbines. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 255:275–288MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Marino E, Lugni C, Stabile G, Borri C (2014) Coupled dynamic simulations of offshore wind turbines using linear, weakly and fully nonlinear wave models: the limitations of the second-order wave theory. In: 9th international conference on structural dynamics EURODYN, June 30–July 2, Porto, PortugalGoogle Scholar
  19. Marino E, Giusti A, Manuel L (2017) Offshore wind turbine fatigue loads: the influence of alternative wave modeling for different turbulent and mean winds. Renewable Energy 102:157–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mockute A, Marino E, Borri C (2017) Effects of wind-wave misalignment on the dynamic response of an offshore wind turbine in highly nonlinear waves. In: 7th European and African conference on wind engineering, 3–6 July, Liege, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  21. Morison JR, O’Brien MP, Johnson JW, Schaaf SA (1950) The force exerted by surface waves on piles. Pet. Trans. AIME 189:149–154Google Scholar
  22. NPD (1992) Annual report, 1992. Norwegian Petroleum Directorate, StavangerGoogle Scholar
  23. Paulsen BT, Bredmose H, Bingham HB, Jacobsen NG (2014) Forcing of a bottom-mounted circular cylinder by steep regular water waves at finite depth. J Fluid Mech 755:1–34MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rainey RCT (1989) A new equation for calculating wave loads on offshore structures. J Fluid Mech 204:295–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rainey RCT (1995) Slender-body expressions for the wave load on offshore structures. Proc Math Phys Sci 450(1939):391–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rienecker MM, Fenton JD (1981) A Fourier approximation method for steady water waves. J Fluid Mech 104:119–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Robertson AN, Jonkman JM, Vorpahl F (2014) Offshore code comparison collaboration continuation within IEA wind task 30: phase II results regarding a floating semisubmersible wind system. In: 33rd international conference on ocean, offshore and arctic engineering, 8–13 June, San Francisco, California, USAGoogle Scholar
  28. Robertson AN, Wendt F, Jonkman JM et al (2015) OC5 project phase i: validation of hydrodynamic loading on a fixed cylinder. In: Twenty-fifth international ocean polar engineering conference, 21–26 June, Kona, HawaiiGoogle Scholar
  29. Robertson AN, Wendt F, Jonkman JM et al (2016) OC5 project phase Ib: validation of hydrodynamic loading on a fixed, flexible cylinder for offshore wind applications. Energy Procedia 94:82–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schløer S, Bredmose H, Bingham HB (2016) The influence of fully nonlinear wave forces on aero-hydro-elastic calculations of monopile wind turbines. Mar. Struct. 50:162–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stansberg CT (1997) Comparing ringing loads from experiments with cylinder of different diameters - an experimental study. In: BOSS 1997 Behaviour of offshore structures 2, pp 95–109Google Scholar
  32. Suja-Thauvin L, Krokstad JR, Bachynski EE, de Ridder E-J (2017) Experimental results of a multimode monopile offshore wind turbine support structure subjected to steep and breaking irregular waves. Ocean Eng 146:339–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Van der Meulen MB, Ashuri T, van Bussel GJW, Molenaar DP (2012) Influence of nonlinear irregular waves on the fatigue loads of an offshore wind turbine. In: The science of making torque from wind, 9–11 October, Oldenburg, GermanyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering (DICEA)Università di FirenzeFlorenceItaly
  2. 2.National Research Council – Maritime Research Institute (CNR-INSEAN)RomeItaly

Personalised recommendations