Aerodynamic Effect of Non-uniform Wind Profiles for Long-Span Bridges
Long-span bridges are often designed based on the assumption of wind field homogeneity. At the Hardanger Bridge, the wind field along the bridge span is monitored though 8 triaxial ultrasonic anemometers. Simultaneously recorded profiles for mean wind velocity and turbulence intensity along the span are used to investigate the effect of non-uniform wind profiles on the aerodynamic behaviour of the Hardanger Bridge. Extreme non-uniformity is considered using Monte Carlo simulations to generate extreme, but realistic wind profiles based on the variability of the measured wind field. When the buffeting response of the Hardanger Bridge is considered, significant effects on the behaviour is found.
KeywordsLong-span bridge Non-uniform wind field Field measurements Complex terrain
The research presented in this study has been financed by the Norwegian Public Roads Administration (NPRA), the Norwegian Research Council and Norconsult AS. The authors appreciate all these contributions.
- Arena A, Lacarbonara W, Valentine DT, Marzocca P (2014) Aeroelastic behavior of long-span suspension bridges under arbitrary wind profiles. J Fluids Struct 50:105–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2014.06.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dassault Systèmes, Waltham (n.d.) ABAQUSGoogle Scholar
- Davenport AG (1962) Buffeting of a suspension bridge by storm winds. J Struct Div 88:233–270Google Scholar
- Fenerci A, Øiseth O (2017) Measured buffeting response of a long-span suspension bridge compared with numerical predictions based on design wind spectra. J Struct Eng 143. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hu L, Xu Y, Zhu Q, Guo A, Kareem A (2017) Tropical storm – induced buffeting response of long-span bridges: enhanced nonstationary buffeting force model. J Struct Eng 143:04017027. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Scanlan RH, Tomko JJ (1971) Airfoil and bridge deck flutter derivatives. J Eng Mech Div 97:1717–1737Google Scholar