Advertisement

Validated Numerical Simulation of Aerodynamic and Aeroelastic Characteristics of Rhein-Crossing Bridge in Leverkusen

  • G. FerriEmail author
  • A. Chiaracane
  • C. Borri
  • R. Höffer
  • F. Lupi
  • U. Winkelmann
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 27)

Abstract

This paper presents the results of numerical investigation of the aeroelastic characteristics of an aged bridge deck. The study is developed on the hand of the Rhein-crossing bridge in Leverkusen (Germany), which is undergoing major investigations and will be likely demolished after 53 years of service. Static coefficients and instationary flutter derivatives are determined by means of both forced vibration tests at WIST wind tunnel (Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Germany) and CFD analysis by performing this last as two-dimensional simulations. Pressure measurements in a cross-section in the middle of the bridge model are performed in the wind tunnel experiments, to analyse the wind flow pattern. The numerical model uses the Finite Volume discretization and the turbulence is simulated by the k-ω-SST model. Force and pressure measurements from wind tunnel tests are used for validating the numerical model. The main and original contribution of the study consists in assessing the aerodynamic, as well as aeroelastic, behaviour of an aged bridge deck (with rather unusual “old-fashion” profile) and to verify the performance of CFD-URANS method to determine the bridge flutter derivatives. The aeroelastic forces are obtained by calculating the vectoral difference between the two sets of measurements (Šarkić et al. 2017; Lupi et al. 2018).

Keywords

Wind tunnel experiments CFD model Flutter derivatives 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The activity presented in the paper is part of the Erasmus traineeship at Ruhr Universität Bochum (RUB) provided by the University of Florence during the years 2017-2018. The authors like to thank wind engineering and fluid mechanics department of RUB and Dr.-Ing. Claudio Mannini for the useful advices.

References

  1. Neuhaus Ch, Roesler S, Höffer R, Hortmanns M, Zahlten W (2009) Identification of 18 flutter derivatives by forced vibration tests – a new experimental rig. In: Proceedings of the European and African conference on wind engineering, FlorenceGoogle Scholar
  2. Šarkić A, Fisch R, Höffer R, Bletzinger K-U (2012) Bridge flutter derivatives based on computed, validated pressure fields. J Wind Eng Industr Aerodyn 104–106:141–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Šarkić A, Höffer R, Brĉić S (2017) Identification of flutter derivatives by forced vibration tests. Gradevinar 69:267–280Google Scholar
  4. Lupi F, Niemann H-J, Höffer R (2018) Aerodynamic damping model in vortex-induced vibrations for wind engineering applications. J Wind Eng Industr Aerodyn 174:281–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Winkelmann U, Glumac A, Lupi F, Höffer R (2017) Vortex induced vibrations on circular structures: numerical modeling of aerodynamic loads. In: Proceedings of the European African conference for wind engineering, LiegeGoogle Scholar
  6. Sarkar PP, Caracoglia L, Haan FL, Sato H, Murakoshi J (2009) Comparative and sensitivity study of flutter derivatives of selected bridge deck sections: Part 1: analysis of inter-laboratory experimental data. Eng Struct 31(1):159–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Menter FR (1993) Zonal two-equation k–o turbulence models for aerodynamic flows. AIAA Paper 93-2906Google Scholar
  8. Menter FR, Kuntz M, Langtry R (2003) Ten years of industrial experience with the SST turbulence model. Turbul Heat Mass Transf 4:625–632Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Ferri
    • 1
    Email author
  • A. Chiaracane
    • 1
  • C. Borri
    • 1
  • R. Höffer
    • 2
  • F. Lupi
    • 2
  • U. Winkelmann
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering (DICEA)Università di FirenzeFlorenceItaly
  2. 2.Faculty of Civil and Environmental EngineeringRuhr-Universität BochumBochumGermany

Personalised recommendations